[Euthanasia in history and the present - in the spectrum between euthanasia and terminal care].

Acta historica Leopoldina Pub Date : 2010-01-01
Dietrich von Engelhardt
{"title":"[Euthanasia in history and the present - in the spectrum between euthanasia and terminal care].","authors":"Dietrich von Engelhardt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Euthanasia signifies in antiquity an easy and happy death and not at all an active termination of life, which was forbidden in the Hippocratic oath, but justified by philosophers. In the Christian middle ages active euthanasia and abortion are explicitly refused. At the beginnings of modern times MORE (1516) and BACON (1623) plead for euthanasia and differentiate for the first time between \"euthanasia interior\" as a mental preparation and \"euthanasia exterior\" as a physical and direct termination of life. Around 1900 a change takes place--in medicine as well as in the humanities and arts. The lawyer Karl BINDING and the psychiatrist Alfred HOCHE (1920) support active euthanasia in the case of mental deficiency; similar views are taken by the population. Under the \"Third Reich\" euthanasia unlawfully is carried out as termination of life without or even against consent. Today oaths, declarations and laws are intended to prevent such a \"medicine without humanity\" (MITSCHERLICH and MIELKE 1947). Active voluntary euthanasia is under certain conditions allowed by the legislation in some countries (Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg). Essential seem the consideration of different types of euthanasia and above all a psychical-mental assistance in the process of dying. The height of culture is measured by dealing with death and dying.</p>","PeriodicalId":7006,"journal":{"name":"Acta historica Leopoldina","volume":" 55","pages":"187-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta historica Leopoldina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Euthanasia signifies in antiquity an easy and happy death and not at all an active termination of life, which was forbidden in the Hippocratic oath, but justified by philosophers. In the Christian middle ages active euthanasia and abortion are explicitly refused. At the beginnings of modern times MORE (1516) and BACON (1623) plead for euthanasia and differentiate for the first time between "euthanasia interior" as a mental preparation and "euthanasia exterior" as a physical and direct termination of life. Around 1900 a change takes place--in medicine as well as in the humanities and arts. The lawyer Karl BINDING and the psychiatrist Alfred HOCHE (1920) support active euthanasia in the case of mental deficiency; similar views are taken by the population. Under the "Third Reich" euthanasia unlawfully is carried out as termination of life without or even against consent. Today oaths, declarations and laws are intended to prevent such a "medicine without humanity" (MITSCHERLICH and MIELKE 1947). Active voluntary euthanasia is under certain conditions allowed by the legislation in some countries (Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg). Essential seem the consideration of different types of euthanasia and above all a psychical-mental assistance in the process of dying. The height of culture is measured by dealing with death and dying.

[历史上的安乐死和现在的安乐死-在安乐死和临终关怀之间的光谱]。
在古代,安乐死意味着一种轻松而快乐的死亡,而根本不是生命的主动终结,这在希波克拉底誓言中是被禁止的,但哲学家们却认为是合理的。在基督教中世纪,积极的安乐死和堕胎是被明确拒绝的。在近代初期,莫尔(1516)和培根(1623)为安乐死辩护,并首次区分了作为精神准备的“内部安乐死”和作为身体和直接结束生命的“外部安乐死”。1900年左右,医学、人文和艺术领域发生了变化。律师Karl BINDING和精神病学家Alfred HOCHE(1920)支持在智力缺陷的情况下实施主动安乐死;民众也持类似观点。在“第三帝国”下,安乐死是在未经同意甚至违反同意的情况下非法实施的。今天,誓言、宣言和法律都是为了防止这种“没有人性的药物”(MITSCHERLICH and MIELKE 1947)。主动自愿安乐死是在某些国家(荷兰、比利时、卢森堡)立法允许的某些条件下进行的。考虑不同类型的安乐死似乎是必要的,最重要的是在死亡过程中提供精神上的帮助。文化的高度是用对待死亡和临终的态度来衡量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信