Effect of a tDCS electrode montage on implicit motor sequence learning in healthy subjects.

Eun Kyoung Kang, Nam-Jong Paik
{"title":"Effect of a tDCS electrode montage on implicit motor sequence learning in healthy subjects.","authors":"Eun Kyoung Kang,&nbsp;Nam-Jong Paik","doi":"10.1186/2040-7378-3-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that a combination of excitatory anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the contralateral motor cortex and inhibitory cathodal tDCS to the ipsilateral motor cortex of the motor performing hand (Bi-tDCS) would elicit more implicit motor sequence learning than anodal tDCS applied to the contralateral motor cortex alone (Uni-tDCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven healthy right-handed adults underwent a randomized crossover experiment of Uni-tDCS, Bi-tDCS, or sham stimulation. Subjects performed a 12-digit finger sequence serial reaction time task with the right hand at baseline (Pre), at immediately (Post 1), and 24 hours after stimulation (Post 2). The ratios of reaction times of predetermined repeating sequence versus random sequence were subjected to statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired t test showed that reaction time ratios were significant decreased by all stimulation types at Post 1 versus Pre (P < 0.01). However, mean reaction time ratios showed a significant decrease after Uni-tDCS (P < 0.01) and Bi-tDCS (P < 0.01), but only a marginal decreased after Sham (P = 0.05) at Post 2, which suggests that motor sequence learning is consolidated by Uni-tDCS and Bi-tDCS, but only partially consolidated by sham stimulation. No significant differences were observed between Uni-tDCS and Bi-tDCS in terms of in reaction time ratios at Post 1 or 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference was found between Uni-tDCS and Bi-tDCS in terms of induced implicit motor sequence learning, but tDCS led to greater consolidation of the learned motor sequence than sham stimulation. These findings need to be tested in the context of stroke hand motor rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12158,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2040-7378-3-4","citationCount":"91","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-3-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

Abstract

Background: This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that a combination of excitatory anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the contralateral motor cortex and inhibitory cathodal tDCS to the ipsilateral motor cortex of the motor performing hand (Bi-tDCS) would elicit more implicit motor sequence learning than anodal tDCS applied to the contralateral motor cortex alone (Uni-tDCS).

Methods: Eleven healthy right-handed adults underwent a randomized crossover experiment of Uni-tDCS, Bi-tDCS, or sham stimulation. Subjects performed a 12-digit finger sequence serial reaction time task with the right hand at baseline (Pre), at immediately (Post 1), and 24 hours after stimulation (Post 2). The ratios of reaction times of predetermined repeating sequence versus random sequence were subjected to statistical analysis.

Results: The paired t test showed that reaction time ratios were significant decreased by all stimulation types at Post 1 versus Pre (P < 0.01). However, mean reaction time ratios showed a significant decrease after Uni-tDCS (P < 0.01) and Bi-tDCS (P < 0.01), but only a marginal decreased after Sham (P = 0.05) at Post 2, which suggests that motor sequence learning is consolidated by Uni-tDCS and Bi-tDCS, but only partially consolidated by sham stimulation. No significant differences were observed between Uni-tDCS and Bi-tDCS in terms of in reaction time ratios at Post 1 or 2.

Conclusions: No significant difference was found between Uni-tDCS and Bi-tDCS in terms of induced implicit motor sequence learning, but tDCS led to greater consolidation of the learned motor sequence than sham stimulation. These findings need to be tested in the context of stroke hand motor rehabilitation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

tDCS电极蒙太奇对健康受试者内隐运动序列学习的影响。
背景:本研究旨在验证对侧运动皮层的兴奋性经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和对运动执行手的同侧运动皮层的抑制性阴极直流电刺激(Bi-tDCS)相结合会比单独应用对侧运动皮层的阳极tDCS (Uni-tDCS)产生更多的内隐运动序列学习的假设。方法:11名健康的右撇子成年人进行了单tdcs、双tdcs或假刺激的随机交叉实验。实验对象分别在刺激前(基线)、刺激后(即时)和刺激后24小时(刺激后2)用右手完成12指序列连续反应时间任务。对预定重复序列与随机重复序列的反应时间之比进行统计分析。结果:配对t检验显示,与刺激前相比,刺激后1时各刺激类型的反应时比均显著降低(P < 0.01)。然而,单tdcs和双tdcs组的平均反应时间比均显著降低(P < 0.01),而假手术组的平均反应时间比仅略有降低(P = 0.05),说明单tdcs和双tdcs组的运动序列学习得到了巩固,但假手术组仅部分巩固。单tdcs和双tdcs在1后或2后的反应时间比方面没有显著差异。结论:单tDCS和双tDCS在诱导内隐运动序列学习方面无显著差异,但tDCS比假刺激更能巩固已习得的运动序列。这些发现需要在中风手部运动康复的背景下进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信