Morphometric analysis in cytologic evaluation of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Mehmet Kefeli, Ilkser Akpolat, Arzu Yildirim, Ahmet Tevfik Sunter, Bedri Kandemir
{"title":"Morphometric analysis in cytologic evaluation of papillary thyroid carcinoma.","authors":"Mehmet Kefeli,&nbsp;Ilkser Akpolat,&nbsp;Arzu Yildirim,&nbsp;Ahmet Tevfik Sunter,&nbsp;Bedri Kandemir","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the morphometric features of papillary carcinomas with follicular neoplasias and benign lesions and to determine the potential role of nuclear morphometric features in their differential diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Morphometric features were investigated in the cytologic samples of 64 cases, including 27 benign lesions, 6 follicular neoplasias and 31 papillary carcinomas. We analyzed 6 morphometric parameters: nuclear area, nuclear perimeter, maximum diameter (MaxD), minimum diameter (MinD), form factor and ratio of MaxD/MinD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the benign lesion and follicular neoplasia groups for any nuclear parameters. However, between benign lesions and papillary carcinomas, there were significant differences for all parameters, except for form factor. Between follicular neoplasms and papillary carcinomas, only the MaxD/MinD ratio was significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicate that the ratio of MaxD/MinD is a distinct nuclear morphometric feature for distinguishing papillary carcinoma from other thyroid lesions, and it may be employed with other cytologic criteria in diagnosing problematic cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":76995,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","volume":"32 4","pages":"234-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the morphometric features of papillary carcinomas with follicular neoplasias and benign lesions and to determine the potential role of nuclear morphometric features in their differential diagnosis.

Study design: Morphometric features were investigated in the cytologic samples of 64 cases, including 27 benign lesions, 6 follicular neoplasias and 31 papillary carcinomas. We analyzed 6 morphometric parameters: nuclear area, nuclear perimeter, maximum diameter (MaxD), minimum diameter (MinD), form factor and ratio of MaxD/MinD.

Results: There were no significant differences between the benign lesion and follicular neoplasia groups for any nuclear parameters. However, between benign lesions and papillary carcinomas, there were significant differences for all parameters, except for form factor. Between follicular neoplasms and papillary carcinomas, only the MaxD/MinD ratio was significantly different.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that the ratio of MaxD/MinD is a distinct nuclear morphometric feature for distinguishing papillary carcinoma from other thyroid lesions, and it may be employed with other cytologic criteria in diagnosing problematic cases.

形态计量学分析在甲状腺乳头状癌细胞学评价中的应用。
目的:比较乳头状癌伴滤泡性瘤变与良性病变的形态特征,探讨核形态特征在鉴别诊断中的潜在作用。研究设计:对64例细胞学样本进行形态学特征分析,其中良性病变27例,滤泡性肿瘤6例,乳头状癌31例。我们分析了核面积、核周长、最大直径(MaxD)、最小直径(MinD)、形状因子和MaxD/MinD比值6个形态学参数。结果:良性病变组与滤泡性瘤变组间各项核参数均无显著性差异。然而,在良性病变和乳头状癌之间,除了形状因子外,所有参数都有显著差异。在滤泡性肿瘤和乳头状癌之间,只有MaxD/MinD比值有显著差异。结论:MaxD/MinD比值是鉴别甲状腺乳头状癌与其他甲状腺病变的一个重要的核形态学特征,可与其他细胞学指标共同用于诊断问题病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信