Mental strain among staff at medical rehabilitation clinics in Germany.

Mirjam Koerner
{"title":"Mental strain among staff at medical rehabilitation clinics in Germany.","authors":"Mirjam Koerner","doi":"10.3205/psm000070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study is to compare the frequency of mental strain effects on employees in somatic and psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics as well as between the different occupational groups. Associations between mental strain effects and working conditions, cooperation in the team and employee satisfaction are also investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is cross-sectional with a descriptive-explorative design. It is composed of a survey with standardized questionnaires (Human Service Workload, Questionnaire on Teamwork and Questionnaire on Staff Satisfaction in Medical Rehabilitation) and global items, and was conducted among all employees of twelve rehabilitation teams (five somatic and seven psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics (n=549)). The response rate of the survey averaged 45% (n=252).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One in four participants reported being emotionally exhausted. There were significantly more emotionally exhausted employees working in the psychosomatic (31%) than in the somatic rehabilitation clinics (16%) (X(2)=7.403, df=1, p<0.05), with physicians most frequently reporting emotional exhaustion (45%). The negative appraisal of mental strain effects is accompanied by negative values for cooperation in the team and employee satisfaction (r=-.38 to r=-.50, p<.001). There were mostly high correlations (r=-.503 to r=-.609) between the working conditions and the mental strain effects (emotional exhaustion, intrinsic motivation, dissatisfaction).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results clearly show that the employees in medical rehabilitation clinics have a high stress level at work, a situation which is also known in other health care organizations. Observations of strong associations between cooperation in the team and strain effects confirm the positive impact of social support in the daily work routine. Correlation between the subjective appraisal of working conditions and the impact of strain is mostly high. It can be assumed that the strain effects can be influenced positively with supportive team and human resource development (person-related interventions) and interventions that enhance working conditions (condition-related interventions).</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"Doc01"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/79/PSM-08-01.PMC3028660.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study is to compare the frequency of mental strain effects on employees in somatic and psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics as well as between the different occupational groups. Associations between mental strain effects and working conditions, cooperation in the team and employee satisfaction are also investigated.

Methods: The present study is cross-sectional with a descriptive-explorative design. It is composed of a survey with standardized questionnaires (Human Service Workload, Questionnaire on Teamwork and Questionnaire on Staff Satisfaction in Medical Rehabilitation) and global items, and was conducted among all employees of twelve rehabilitation teams (five somatic and seven psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics (n=549)). The response rate of the survey averaged 45% (n=252).

Results: One in four participants reported being emotionally exhausted. There were significantly more emotionally exhausted employees working in the psychosomatic (31%) than in the somatic rehabilitation clinics (16%) (X(2)=7.403, df=1, p<0.05), with physicians most frequently reporting emotional exhaustion (45%). The negative appraisal of mental strain effects is accompanied by negative values for cooperation in the team and employee satisfaction (r=-.38 to r=-.50, p<.001). There were mostly high correlations (r=-.503 to r=-.609) between the working conditions and the mental strain effects (emotional exhaustion, intrinsic motivation, dissatisfaction).

Conclusions: The results clearly show that the employees in medical rehabilitation clinics have a high stress level at work, a situation which is also known in other health care organizations. Observations of strong associations between cooperation in the team and strain effects confirm the positive impact of social support in the daily work routine. Correlation between the subjective appraisal of working conditions and the impact of strain is mostly high. It can be assumed that the strain effects can be influenced positively with supportive team and human resource development (person-related interventions) and interventions that enhance working conditions (condition-related interventions).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

德国医疗康复诊所工作人员的精神紧张。
目的:本研究的目的是比较身心康复诊所员工精神紧张效应的频率,以及不同职业群体之间的差异。心理紧张效应与工作条件、团队合作和员工满意度之间的关系也被调查。方法:本研究采用描述-探索性设计。本研究由标准化问卷(人类服务工作量问卷、团队合作问卷和医疗康复工作人员满意度问卷)和全球问卷组成,对12个康复团队(5个躯体康复诊所和7个心身康复诊所(n=549))的所有员工进行调查。调查的平均回复率为45% (n=252)。结果:四分之一的参与者称自己情绪疲惫。心理康复诊所员工的情绪疲惫程度(31%)明显高于躯体康复诊所员工(16%)(X(2)=7.403, df=1, p)。结论:医学康复诊所员工在工作中存在较高的压力水平,这一现象在其他医疗机构中也存在。对团队合作和压力效应之间的密切联系的观察证实了社会支持在日常工作中的积极影响。对工作条件的主观评价与应变影响之间的相关性大多较高。可以假设,支持性团队和人力资源开发(与人有关的干预措施)以及改善工作条件的干预措施(与条件有关的干预措施)可以对紧张效应产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书