Health care workers and pertussis: an underestimated issue.

Medizinische Klinik Pub Date : 2010-12-01 Epub Date: 2011-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s00063-010-1153-0
Sabine Wicker, Markus A Rose
{"title":"Health care workers and pertussis: an underestimated issue.","authors":"Sabine Wicker,&nbsp;Markus A Rose","doi":"10.1007/s00063-010-1153-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Communicable and vaccine-preventable airway infections are a major public and occupational health issue. The epidemiology of pertussis has changed, with unprotected adults being the main source of infections. Thus, the prevention of a transmission from health care workers (HCWs) to patients is an important strategy to control this communicable infection. The Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) at the Robert Koch-Institute in Germany has explicitly recommended that HCWs ought to be vaccinated against pertussis. However, vaccination rates among HCWs remain low. This study was meant to evaluate the attitudes of HCWs towards the pertussis vaccination and to determine the correlation between the influenza and pertussis vaccination status of HCWs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to HCWs at a German university hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we found a disturbingly low level of awareness concerning official recommendations as to immunizations (35.6%) and the personal risk assessment of acquiring a work-related pertussis infection (23.2%). In general, both aspects were frequently associated with a refusal to get immunized. A strong correlation between the immunization status of pertussis and influenza was found among physicians: overall, 93.1% of physicians who were vaccinated against pertussis were also vaccinated against influenza. Nurses showed significantly weaker correlation rates as well as lower vaccination rates (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Misconceptions about pertussis and low vaccination rates were prevalent among HCWs, particularly nurses. Hospital-based pertussis vaccination campaigns should focus on the risk of nosocomial pertussis transmission and on the new recommendations for pertussis immunization among adults and HCWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18420,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00063-010-1153-0","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-010-1153-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Purpose: Communicable and vaccine-preventable airway infections are a major public and occupational health issue. The epidemiology of pertussis has changed, with unprotected adults being the main source of infections. Thus, the prevention of a transmission from health care workers (HCWs) to patients is an important strategy to control this communicable infection. The Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) at the Robert Koch-Institute in Germany has explicitly recommended that HCWs ought to be vaccinated against pertussis. However, vaccination rates among HCWs remain low. This study was meant to evaluate the attitudes of HCWs towards the pertussis vaccination and to determine the correlation between the influenza and pertussis vaccination status of HCWs.

Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to HCWs at a German university hospital.

Results: Overall, we found a disturbingly low level of awareness concerning official recommendations as to immunizations (35.6%) and the personal risk assessment of acquiring a work-related pertussis infection (23.2%). In general, both aspects were frequently associated with a refusal to get immunized. A strong correlation between the immunization status of pertussis and influenza was found among physicians: overall, 93.1% of physicians who were vaccinated against pertussis were also vaccinated against influenza. Nurses showed significantly weaker correlation rates as well as lower vaccination rates (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Misconceptions about pertussis and low vaccination rates were prevalent among HCWs, particularly nurses. Hospital-based pertussis vaccination campaigns should focus on the risk of nosocomial pertussis transmission and on the new recommendations for pertussis immunization among adults and HCWs.

卫生保健工作者和百日咳:一个被低估的问题。
目的:传染性和疫苗可预防的气道感染是一个主要的公共和职业卫生问题。百日咳的流行病学发生了变化,未受保护的成年人成为主要感染源。因此,预防从卫生保健工作者(HCWs)传播给患者是控制这种传染性感染的重要战略。德国罗伯特·科赫研究所的疫苗接种常设委员会(STIKO)明确建议卫生工作者应该接种百日咳疫苗。然而,卫生保健员的疫苗接种率仍然很低。本研究旨在评估医护人员对百日咳疫苗接种的态度,并确定医护人员流感与百日咳疫苗接种情况的相关性。方法:对德国某大学医院的医护人员进行匿名问卷调查。结果:总体而言,我们发现对官方建议的免疫接种(35.6%)和获得与工作有关的百日咳感染的个人风险评估(23.2%)的认识水平低得令人不安。一般来说,这两方面都经常与拒绝接种疫苗有关。在医生中发现百日咳免疫状况与流感之间存在很强的相关性:总体而言,93.1%接种了百日咳疫苗的医生也接种了流感疫苗。结论:护士对百日咳的误解和低接种率在卫生保健工作者中普遍存在,尤其是护士。以医院为基础的百日咳疫苗接种运动应侧重于百日咳院内传播的风险以及成人和卫生保健工作者中百日咳免疫接种的新建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medizinische Klinik
Medizinische Klinik 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信