[Resistant hypertension despite nine different antihypertensive drugs?].

Medizinische Klinik Pub Date : 2010-12-01 Epub Date: 2011-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s00063-010-1161-0
Philip M Muck, Jürgen Steinhoff, Hendrik Lehnert, Christian S Haas
{"title":"[Resistant hypertension despite nine different antihypertensive drugs?].","authors":"Philip M Muck,&nbsp;Jürgen Steinhoff,&nbsp;Hendrik Lehnert,&nbsp;Christian S Haas","doi":"10.1007/s00063-010-1161-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment-resistant hypertension is a common problem in an outpatient setting and often results in hospital admission. Non-identified secondary hypertension, hypertensive nephrosclerosis and non-compliance are major reasons for treatment resistance.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 75-year old woman was admitted to the emergency room because of a hypertensive crisis with alleged treatment-resistant hypertension and progressive headache. Two months ago, renal artery stenosis had been ruled out and a diagnosis of hypertensive cardiomyopathy was established. On admission, the patient had a blood pressure of 210/100 mmHg despite an antihypertensive treatment with nine different drugs. Further investigations ruled out secondary hypertension due to an endocrine cause but were consistent with hypertensive nephrosclerosis. With a supervised drug intake the blood pressure was rather normal to hypotensive, resulting in the need for significant reduction of the antihypertensive medication. The apparent discrepancies were discussed in detail with the patient who finally admitted a previous inconsistent intake of the antihypertensive drugs. Following thorough training and education on the purpose of continued antihypertensive therapy, the patient could be discharged with a normotensive blood pressure profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapy of treatment-resistant hypertension should always consider non-compliance and secondary hypertension as possible reason.</p>","PeriodicalId":18420,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00063-010-1161-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-010-1161-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment-resistant hypertension is a common problem in an outpatient setting and often results in hospital admission. Non-identified secondary hypertension, hypertensive nephrosclerosis and non-compliance are major reasons for treatment resistance.

Case report: A 75-year old woman was admitted to the emergency room because of a hypertensive crisis with alleged treatment-resistant hypertension and progressive headache. Two months ago, renal artery stenosis had been ruled out and a diagnosis of hypertensive cardiomyopathy was established. On admission, the patient had a blood pressure of 210/100 mmHg despite an antihypertensive treatment with nine different drugs. Further investigations ruled out secondary hypertension due to an endocrine cause but were consistent with hypertensive nephrosclerosis. With a supervised drug intake the blood pressure was rather normal to hypotensive, resulting in the need for significant reduction of the antihypertensive medication. The apparent discrepancies were discussed in detail with the patient who finally admitted a previous inconsistent intake of the antihypertensive drugs. Following thorough training and education on the purpose of continued antihypertensive therapy, the patient could be discharged with a normotensive blood pressure profile.

Conclusions: Therapy of treatment-resistant hypertension should always consider non-compliance and secondary hypertension as possible reason.

[尽管有9种不同的降压药,但顽固性高血压?]。
背景:难治性高血压是门诊常见的问题,经常导致住院。未确诊的继发性高血压、高血压性肾硬化和不遵医嘱是治疗耐药的主要原因。病例报告:一名75岁妇女因高血压危象,并伴有难治性高血压和进行性头痛而被送往急诊室。两个月前,肾动脉狭窄已被排除,并诊断为高血压心肌病。入院时,患者的血压为210/100 mmHg,尽管接受了9种不同药物的降压治疗。进一步的调查排除了由于内分泌原因引起的继发性高血压,但与高血压性肾硬化一致。在有监督的药物摄入下,血压相当正常到低血压,导致需要显著减少降压药。我们详细讨论了这些明显的差异,并与最终承认之前服用抗高血压药物不一致的患者进行了讨论。经过全面的培训和持续降压治疗的教育,患者可以在血压正常的情况下出院。结论:治疗难治性高血压应考虑不遵医嘱及继发性高血压的可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medizinische Klinik
Medizinische Klinik 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信