Bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere of field-grown genetically modified pine trees (Pinus radiata D.).

Environmental biosafety research Pub Date : 2010-01-01 Epub Date: 2010-11-11 DOI:10.1051/ebr/2010007
Jana Lottmann, Maureen O'Callaghan, David Baird, Christian Walter
{"title":"Bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere of field-grown genetically modified pine trees (Pinus radiata D.).","authors":"Jana Lottmann,&nbsp;Maureen O'Callaghan,&nbsp;David Baird,&nbsp;Christian Walter","doi":"10.1051/ebr/2010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the impact of Pinus radiata (D. Don) genetically modified (GM) by biolistic insertion of the LEAFY and nptII genes on rhizosphere microbial communities of field grown trees. Rhizosphere soil was sampled quarterly for two consecutive years. A culture-independent approach was used to characterise the microbial communities based on PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S/18S rDNA gene fragments, and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) fragments amplified from total rhizosphere DNA. Trees from two independent transformation events were sampled, together with non-modified control trees of the same parental genotype. DGGE profiles of rhizosphere general Bacteria did not differ between GM and control trees with one exception (summer 2006 sample). For Alphaproteo- and Actinobacteria, significant differences between treatments were detected in one out of eight samplings. Small seasonal shifts could be detected in all bacterial communities. General fungal and ectomycorrhizal communities did not differ significantly between GM and control trees with the exception of summer 2006, when ectomycorrhizal communities associated with GM trees from one transformation event differed from those associated with control trees. Small seasonal shifts of general fungal and ectomycorrhizal communities were seen over the two-year sampling period. More detailed analysis of microbial communities at one sampling date (using amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and 16S/18S rDNA sequencing) revealed significant differences in four ARDRA groups between one GM treatment and the control (bacteria), and significant differences in one ARDRA group between the two GM treatments (fungi). When data from all sampling dates are considered together, the low incidence of statistical differences in the microbial communities associated with the genetically modified and control trees suggests that there was no significant impact of this genetic modification on rhizosphere microbial communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":87177,"journal":{"name":"Environmental biosafety research","volume":"9 1","pages":"25-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1051/ebr/2010007","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental biosafety research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of Pinus radiata (D. Don) genetically modified (GM) by biolistic insertion of the LEAFY and nptII genes on rhizosphere microbial communities of field grown trees. Rhizosphere soil was sampled quarterly for two consecutive years. A culture-independent approach was used to characterise the microbial communities based on PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S/18S rDNA gene fragments, and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) fragments amplified from total rhizosphere DNA. Trees from two independent transformation events were sampled, together with non-modified control trees of the same parental genotype. DGGE profiles of rhizosphere general Bacteria did not differ between GM and control trees with one exception (summer 2006 sample). For Alphaproteo- and Actinobacteria, significant differences between treatments were detected in one out of eight samplings. Small seasonal shifts could be detected in all bacterial communities. General fungal and ectomycorrhizal communities did not differ significantly between GM and control trees with the exception of summer 2006, when ectomycorrhizal communities associated with GM trees from one transformation event differed from those associated with control trees. Small seasonal shifts of general fungal and ectomycorrhizal communities were seen over the two-year sampling period. More detailed analysis of microbial communities at one sampling date (using amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and 16S/18S rDNA sequencing) revealed significant differences in four ARDRA groups between one GM treatment and the control (bacteria), and significant differences in one ARDRA group between the two GM treatments (fungi). When data from all sampling dates are considered together, the low incidence of statistical differences in the microbial communities associated with the genetically modified and control trees suggests that there was no significant impact of this genetic modification on rhizosphere microbial communities.

大田转基因松树根际细菌和真菌群落研究
本研究评价了通过生物插入LEAFY基因和nptII基因的转基因辐射松(Pinus radiata, D. Don)对大田生长树根际微生物群落的影响。根际土壤连续两年每季度取样一次。采用不依赖培养的方法,利用16S/18S rDNA基因片段的PCR和变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE),以及从根际总DNA中扩增的内部转录间隔片段(ITS)来表征微生物群落。来自两个独立转化事件的树与相同亲本基因型的未修饰的对照树一起取样。根际一般细菌的DGGE谱在转基因树和对照树之间没有差异,只有一个例外(2006年夏季样本)。对于α蛋白和放线菌,在8个样本中有1个检测到处理之间的显着差异。在所有细菌群落中都可以检测到小的季节性变化。一般真菌和外生菌根群落在转基因树和对照树之间没有显著差异,2006年夏季除外,一次转化事件中与转基因树相关的外生菌根群落不同于与对照树相关的外生菌根群落。在两年的采样期内,一般真菌和外生菌根群落出现了小的季节性变化。在一个采样日期对微生物群落进行更详细的分析(使用扩增rDNA限制性分析(ARDRA)和16S/18S rDNA测序)显示,一种转基因处理与对照(细菌)之间的4种ARDRA组存在显著差异,两种转基因处理(真菌)之间的1种ARDRA组存在显著差异。当将所有采样日期的数据放在一起考虑时,与转基因树和对照树相关的微生物群落的统计差异发生率较低,这表明这种转基因对根际微生物群落没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信