Ambre Piquard, Christian Derouesné, Vincent Meininger, Lucette Lacomblez
{"title":"[DEX and executive dysfunction in activities of daily living in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia].","authors":"Ambre Piquard, Christian Derouesné, Vincent Meininger, Lucette Lacomblez","doi":"10.1684/pnv.2010.0220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The questionnaire DEX was designed by Wilson et al. in 1996 to explore the disturbances of executive functions (EF) in activities of daily living (ADL).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was performed to explore the specificity of the DEX to evaluate executive dysfunction in ADL, and its contribution to the distinction between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>13 patients with the frontal variant of FTD, 19 patients with FTD associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, FTD/SLA, 18 patients with Alzheimer's disease, AD, and 24 controlled subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scores on the DEX completed by a proxy as well as those on two scales assessing ADL (the Cognitive Difficulties Scale by McNair & Kahn, and a composite scale (NADL) including the evaluation of basic (BADL) and instrumental (IADL) by the Lawton & Brody scales, and of social activities (SADL) from Katz & Lyerly) were compared to neuropsychological tests assessing EF (Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop test, Trail Making Test B, lexical and categorical verbal fluencies, WAIS-III similarities).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No correlation was found between the scores on the DEX or the other ADL scales, and the BADS scores. Scores on DEX showed some weak correlations with some executive tasks, but no stronger than those found with the other ADL scales. Analysis of the most frequently perturbed DEX items failed to show a characteristic profile for EF dysfunction. No significant difference was found between patients with AD and DFT on the scores on the DEX as well as on other ADL scales, when adjusted for dementia severity (assessed by the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS)). No difference was found between MA and DFT patients neither in the profile of the most frequently perturbed DEX items, nor in decreased awareness of the disorders assessed by comparison of the scores on the DEX completed by patients and familiars.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, DEX does not appear as a specific tool for assessing EF dysfunction in ADL compared to other ADL scales. It was more related to global cognitive difficulties as assessed by the CDS and the MDRS. Scores on the DEX as well as on other ADL scales do not contribute to the distinction between AD and FTD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54537,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie & Neuropsychiatrie Du Vieillissement","volume":"8 3","pages":"215-24; quiz 225-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1684/pnv.2010.0220","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie & Neuropsychiatrie Du Vieillissement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2010.0220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Unlabelled: The questionnaire DEX was designed by Wilson et al. in 1996 to explore the disturbances of executive functions (EF) in activities of daily living (ADL).
Objective: This study was performed to explore the specificity of the DEX to evaluate executive dysfunction in ADL, and its contribution to the distinction between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD).
Subjects: 13 patients with the frontal variant of FTD, 19 patients with FTD associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, FTD/SLA, 18 patients with Alzheimer's disease, AD, and 24 controlled subjects.
Methods: The scores on the DEX completed by a proxy as well as those on two scales assessing ADL (the Cognitive Difficulties Scale by McNair & Kahn, and a composite scale (NADL) including the evaluation of basic (BADL) and instrumental (IADL) by the Lawton & Brody scales, and of social activities (SADL) from Katz & Lyerly) were compared to neuropsychological tests assessing EF (Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop test, Trail Making Test B, lexical and categorical verbal fluencies, WAIS-III similarities).
Results: No correlation was found between the scores on the DEX or the other ADL scales, and the BADS scores. Scores on DEX showed some weak correlations with some executive tasks, but no stronger than those found with the other ADL scales. Analysis of the most frequently perturbed DEX items failed to show a characteristic profile for EF dysfunction. No significant difference was found between patients with AD and DFT on the scores on the DEX as well as on other ADL scales, when adjusted for dementia severity (assessed by the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS)). No difference was found between MA and DFT patients neither in the profile of the most frequently perturbed DEX items, nor in decreased awareness of the disorders assessed by comparison of the scores on the DEX completed by patients and familiars.
Conclusion: In this study, DEX does not appear as a specific tool for assessing EF dysfunction in ADL compared to other ADL scales. It was more related to global cognitive difficulties as assessed by the CDS and the MDRS. Scores on the DEX as well as on other ADL scales do not contribute to the distinction between AD and FTD.
未标记:问卷DEX由Wilson等人于1996年设计,旨在探讨日常生活活动(ADL)中执行功能(EF)的干扰。目的:本研究旨在探讨DEX评估ADL执行功能障碍的特异性,以及其在区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)中的作用。研究对象:13例FTD额部变异,19例FTD合并肌萎缩侧索硬化症(FTD/SLA), 18例阿尔茨海默病(AD), 24例对照。方法:由代理完成的DEX得分以及评估ADL的两个量表(McNair & Kahn的认知困难量表,以及包含劳顿&布罗迪量表的基本(BADL)和工具(IADL)评估的复合量表(NADL),以及Katz & Lyerly的社会活动(SADL))的得分与评估EF的神经心理测试(执行障碍综合征行为评估(BADS),威斯康星卡片分类测试,Stroop测试,Trail Making Test B,词汇和范畴语言流畅度,WAIS-III相似度)。结果:DEX评分及其他ADL量表评分与BADS评分无相关性。DEX的得分与一些执行任务有微弱的相关性,但并不比其他ADL量表的得分强。对最常受干扰的DEX项目的分析未能显示EF功能障碍的特征。当调整痴呆严重程度(通过Mattis痴呆评定量表(MDRS)评估)时,AD和DFT患者在DEX和其他ADL量表上的得分没有显著差异。MA和DFT患者在最常受干扰的DEX项目的概况中没有发现差异,也没有通过比较患者和熟悉者完成的DEX得分来评估疾病意识的降低。结论:在本研究中,与其他ADL量表相比,DEX并不是评估ADL中EF功能障碍的特定工具。在CDS和MDRS评估中,它与整体认知困难更相关。DEX和其他ADL量表的得分并不能区分AD和FTD。