Preliminary comparison of tumor biologic factors in breast carcinomas from Australian and Chinese women.

Weiqiang Zheng, Jane E Armes, John Slavin, Yuzhao Zhu, Canrong Ni
{"title":"Preliminary comparison of tumor biologic factors in breast carcinomas from Australian and Chinese women.","authors":"Weiqiang Zheng,&nbsp;Jane E Armes,&nbsp;John Slavin,&nbsp;Yuzhao Zhu,&nbsp;Canrong Ni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the morphologic and immunohistochemical properties of breast carcinomas from Chinese and Australian women in order to define possible biologic differences between these carcinomas.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Three hundred cases of breast carcinomas were assessed for histologic and immunophenotypic characteristics from the pathology archives of the Changhai and St. Vincent's Hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chinese women had proportionally more grade 2 and 3 tumors, whereas Australian women had a higher proportion of grade 1 tumor. There was a higher proportion of younger patients with a larger tumor and patients with lymph node involvement in the Chinese group as compared with Australian women. There was no difference in rate of estrogen receptor positive tumors between the 2 groups. p53 Expression was statistically more common with less cyclin D1 expression in Chinese as compared with Australian women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that both inherent tumor biology and stage at presentation influence adversely affect the outcome of breast carcinoma in Chinese compared as with Australian women.</p>","PeriodicalId":76995,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","volume":"32 3","pages":"155-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the morphologic and immunohistochemical properties of breast carcinomas from Chinese and Australian women in order to define possible biologic differences between these carcinomas.

Study design: Three hundred cases of breast carcinomas were assessed for histologic and immunophenotypic characteristics from the pathology archives of the Changhai and St. Vincent's Hospitals.

Results: The Chinese women had proportionally more grade 2 and 3 tumors, whereas Australian women had a higher proportion of grade 1 tumor. There was a higher proportion of younger patients with a larger tumor and patients with lymph node involvement in the Chinese group as compared with Australian women. There was no difference in rate of estrogen receptor positive tumors between the 2 groups. p53 Expression was statistically more common with less cyclin D1 expression in Chinese as compared with Australian women.

Conclusion: This study indicates that both inherent tumor biology and stage at presentation influence adversely affect the outcome of breast carcinoma in Chinese compared as with Australian women.

澳大利亚和中国妇女乳腺癌肿瘤生物学因素的初步比较。
目的:比较中国和澳大利亚女性乳腺癌的形态学和免疫组织化学特征,以确定两种乳腺癌之间可能的生物学差异。研究设计:从长海医院和圣文森特医院的病理档案中对300例乳腺癌患者的组织学和免疫表型特征进行评估。结果:中国女性患2级和3级肿瘤的比例更高,而澳大利亚女性患1级肿瘤的比例更高。与澳大利亚女性相比,中国女性中肿瘤较大的年轻患者和淋巴结受累患者的比例更高。两组患者雌激素受体阳性肿瘤发生率无明显差异。与澳大利亚女性相比,中国女性p53表达更普遍,cyclin D1表达更少。结论:本研究表明,与澳大利亚妇女相比,中国妇女乳腺癌的预后受到肿瘤固有生物学和发病分期的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信