{"title":"[The art cabinet and its current significance. Museum establishment of natural history in early modern times].","authors":"Robert Felfe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For some time a hightened interest in so-called \"curiosity cabinets\" of the 16th to 18th century has surfaced in the historical sciences as well as in exhibitions with popular appeal, the arts and literature. Johann Laurentius Bausch was among those who assembled such a collection of natural history objects and artefacts. His curiosity cabinet was closely connected to his far more famous library and in his last will Bausch attempted to safeguard the coherence of the two. Against this background the article accentuates some of the aspects of his work from a perspective of a history of collections. One focus will thereby be on the practice of collecting as seemingly contradictory, being characterised on the one hand by the preservation of ancient knowledge as well as by scientific research based on specific objects. Another focus will be on curiosity cabinets as important platforms of exchange and means of social advancement. For the Academia Naturae Curiosorum exhibition objects and their publication were an important device of achieving recognition and protection from the Emperor's Court.</p>","PeriodicalId":7006,"journal":{"name":"Acta historica Leopoldina","volume":" 49","pages":"215-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta historica Leopoldina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For some time a hightened interest in so-called "curiosity cabinets" of the 16th to 18th century has surfaced in the historical sciences as well as in exhibitions with popular appeal, the arts and literature. Johann Laurentius Bausch was among those who assembled such a collection of natural history objects and artefacts. His curiosity cabinet was closely connected to his far more famous library and in his last will Bausch attempted to safeguard the coherence of the two. Against this background the article accentuates some of the aspects of his work from a perspective of a history of collections. One focus will thereby be on the practice of collecting as seemingly contradictory, being characterised on the one hand by the preservation of ancient knowledge as well as by scientific research based on specific objects. Another focus will be on curiosity cabinets as important platforms of exchange and means of social advancement. For the Academia Naturae Curiosorum exhibition objects and their publication were an important device of achieving recognition and protection from the Emperor's Court.
一段时间以来,人们对16至18世纪的所谓“奇珍异宝柜”产生了浓厚的兴趣,这种兴趣不仅出现在历史科学领域,也出现在具有大众吸引力的展览、艺术和文学领域。Johann Laurentius Bausch是收集这些自然历史物品和人工制品的人之一。他的珍品柜与他那远比他出名的图书馆紧密相连,在他最后的遗嘱中,鲍什试图维护两者的一致性。在此背景下,文章强调了一些方面,他的工作,从历史的角度来看,收藏。因此,一个重点将放在看似矛盾的收集实践上,其特点一方面是保存古代知识,另一方面是基于特定对象的科学研究。另一个重点将是作为重要交流平台和社会进步手段的古玩柜。对于科学院自然博物馆来说,展品及其出版是获得皇朝认可和保护的重要手段。