G-CSF, rt-PA and combination therapy after experimental thromboembolic stroke.

Rainer Kollmar, Nils Henninger, Christian Urbanek, Stefan Schwab
{"title":"G-CSF, rt-PA and combination therapy after experimental thromboembolic stroke.","authors":"Rainer Kollmar,&nbsp;Nils Henninger,&nbsp;Christian Urbanek,&nbsp;Stefan Schwab","doi":"10.1186/2040-7378-2-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) has remarkable neuroprotective properties. Due to its proven safety profile, G-CSF is currently used in clinical stroke trials. As neuroprotectants are considered to be more effective in the early phase of cerebral ischemia and during reperfusion, G-CSF should to be tested in combination with thrombolysis. Therefore, combination therapy was investigated in an experimental model of thromboembolic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male Wistar rats (n = 72) were subjected to a model of thromboembolic occlusion (TE) of the middle cerebral artery. Different groups (n = 12 each) treated by recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or/and G-CSF: group control (control), group early G-CSF (G-CSF 60 min after TE), group rt-PA (rt-PA 60 min after TE), group com (combination rt-PA/G-CSF), group delayed rt-PA (rt-PA after 180 min), group deco (G-CSF after 60 min, rt-PA after 180 min). Animals were investigated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and silver infarct staining (SIS) 24 hours after TE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early G-CSF or rt-PA reduced the infarct size compared to all groups (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01) with the exception of group com, (p = n.s.) as measured by T2, DWI, and SIS. Late administration of rt-PA lead to high mortality and larger infarcts compared to all other groups (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01). Pre-treatment by G-CSF (deco) reduced infarct site compared to delayed rt-PA treatment (p < 0.05). G-CSF did not significantly influence PWI when combined with rt-PA. All animals treated by rt-PA showed improved parameters in PWI indicating reperfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>G-CSF was neuroprotective when given early after TE. Early combination with rt-PA showed no additional benefit compared to rt-PA or G-CSF alone, but did not lead to side effects. Pretreatment by G-CSF was able to reduce deleterious effects of late rt-PA treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12158,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","volume":"2 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2040-7378-2-9","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-2-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) has remarkable neuroprotective properties. Due to its proven safety profile, G-CSF is currently used in clinical stroke trials. As neuroprotectants are considered to be more effective in the early phase of cerebral ischemia and during reperfusion, G-CSF should to be tested in combination with thrombolysis. Therefore, combination therapy was investigated in an experimental model of thromboembolic stroke.

Methods: Male Wistar rats (n = 72) were subjected to a model of thromboembolic occlusion (TE) of the middle cerebral artery. Different groups (n = 12 each) treated by recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or/and G-CSF: group control (control), group early G-CSF (G-CSF 60 min after TE), group rt-PA (rt-PA 60 min after TE), group com (combination rt-PA/G-CSF), group delayed rt-PA (rt-PA after 180 min), group deco (G-CSF after 60 min, rt-PA after 180 min). Animals were investigated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and silver infarct staining (SIS) 24 hours after TE.

Results: Early G-CSF or rt-PA reduced the infarct size compared to all groups (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01) with the exception of group com, (p = n.s.) as measured by T2, DWI, and SIS. Late administration of rt-PA lead to high mortality and larger infarcts compared to all other groups (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01). Pre-treatment by G-CSF (deco) reduced infarct site compared to delayed rt-PA treatment (p < 0.05). G-CSF did not significantly influence PWI when combined with rt-PA. All animals treated by rt-PA showed improved parameters in PWI indicating reperfusion.

Conclusions: G-CSF was neuroprotective when given early after TE. Early combination with rt-PA showed no additional benefit compared to rt-PA or G-CSF alone, but did not lead to side effects. Pretreatment by G-CSF was able to reduce deleterious effects of late rt-PA treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

实验性血栓栓塞性脑卒中后G-CSF、rt-PA及联合治疗。
背景:粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)具有显著的神经保护作用。由于其已证实的安全性,G-CSF目前用于临床卒中试验。由于神经保护剂被认为在脑缺血早期和再灌注期间更有效,因此G-CSF应与溶栓联合检测。因此,在血栓栓塞性中风的实验模型中研究了联合治疗。方法:72只雄性Wistar大鼠建立大脑中动脉血栓栓塞性闭塞(TE)模型。重组组织-纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)或/和G-CSF处理组:对照组(对照组)、早期G-CSF组(TE后60 min)、rt-PA组(TE后60 min)、com组(rt-PA /G-CSF联合组)、延迟rt-PA组(rt-PA后180 min)、deco组(G-CSF后60 min、rt-PA后180 min)。TE后24小时采用磁共振成像(MRI)和银梗死染色(SIS)对动物进行观察。结果:T2、DWI、SIS检测结果显示,除com组外,早期G-CSF或rt-PA均能减小梗死面积(p < 0.05 ~ p < 0.01)。与所有其他组相比,晚期给药rt-PA导致高死亡率和更大的梗死(p < 0.05 ~ p < 0.01)。与延迟rt-PA治疗相比,G-CSF (deco)预处理减少了梗死面积(p < 0.05)。G-CSF联合rt-PA对PWI无显著影响。所有经rt-PA处理的动物PWI参数均改善,显示再灌注。结论:TE术后早期给予G-CSF具有神经保护作用。与单独使用rt-PA或G-CSF相比,早期联合使用rt-PA没有额外的益处,但没有导致副作用。G-CSF预处理能够减少后期rt-PA治疗的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信