A rabbit model for efficacy evaluation of endovascular coil materials

Masaki Ebara MD , Ichiro Yuki MD , Yuichi Murayama MD , Takayuki Saguchi MD , Yih-Lin Nien MD , Harry V. Vinters MD , Fernando Vinuela MD , Toshiaki Abe MD
{"title":"A rabbit model for efficacy evaluation of endovascular coil materials","authors":"Masaki Ebara MD ,&nbsp;Ichiro Yuki MD ,&nbsp;Yuichi Murayama MD ,&nbsp;Takayuki Saguchi MD ,&nbsp;Yih-Lin Nien MD ,&nbsp;Harry V. Vinters MD ,&nbsp;Fernando Vinuela MD ,&nbsp;Toshiaki Abe MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surneu.2009.04.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To investigate biomaterials seeking for their possible use for aneurysm treatment, in vivo screening tests using a number of potential materials are required. However, there is no established animal model that is suitable for such purpose. Some models require special preparation of tested materials for transcatheter delivery and others are inappropriate in view of their cost-effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to establish an animal model that overcomes these limitations and help us select potential materials before the preclinical evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Bilateral CCAs in a rabbit were surgically ligated, and a 2-cm segment of either a bare platinum coil or a polymeric coil (a platinum coil coated with PLGA 10/90) was implanted into each blind-ended arterial segment (n = 26). They were harvested at day 1, 7, 10, 14, or 30, respectively. Angiographic and histologic evaluations as well as quantitative analysis on the development of the organized thrombus were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One day after the implantation, both platinum and PLGA coils were surrounded by immature thrombus that was induced by blood flow stagnation in the arterial segment. At day 7, minimal thrombus organization was observed around both types of materials. At postimplantation days 10 and 14, fibrocellular responses, the early findings of the thrombus organization process, were observed in both material groups. Such histologic findings were more prominent in the PLGA coil group as compared to the platinum coil group (day 10, <em>P</em> = .051; day 14, <em>P</em> = .011). Well-organized thrombus was observed in both material groups at day 30 without showing statistical difference (<em>P</em> = .12).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Given the cost-effectiveness, the simple material preparation process, and its feasible histologic evaluation methods, this new animal model can be useful in screening other potential biomaterials for the development of new coil devices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22153,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Neurology","volume":"72 6","pages":"Pages 620-627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.surneu.2009.04.017","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090301909004157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

To investigate biomaterials seeking for their possible use for aneurysm treatment, in vivo screening tests using a number of potential materials are required. However, there is no established animal model that is suitable for such purpose. Some models require special preparation of tested materials for transcatheter delivery and others are inappropriate in view of their cost-effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to establish an animal model that overcomes these limitations and help us select potential materials before the preclinical evaluation.

Methods

Bilateral CCAs in a rabbit were surgically ligated, and a 2-cm segment of either a bare platinum coil or a polymeric coil (a platinum coil coated with PLGA 10/90) was implanted into each blind-ended arterial segment (n = 26). They were harvested at day 1, 7, 10, 14, or 30, respectively. Angiographic and histologic evaluations as well as quantitative analysis on the development of the organized thrombus were performed.

Results

One day after the implantation, both platinum and PLGA coils were surrounded by immature thrombus that was induced by blood flow stagnation in the arterial segment. At day 7, minimal thrombus organization was observed around both types of materials. At postimplantation days 10 and 14, fibrocellular responses, the early findings of the thrombus organization process, were observed in both material groups. Such histologic findings were more prominent in the PLGA coil group as compared to the platinum coil group (day 10, P = .051; day 14, P = .011). Well-organized thrombus was observed in both material groups at day 30 without showing statistical difference (P = .12).

Conclusion

Given the cost-effectiveness, the simple material preparation process, and its feasible histologic evaluation methods, this new animal model can be useful in screening other potential biomaterials for the development of new coil devices.

兔血管内线圈材料疗效评价模型
为了研究生物材料在动脉瘤治疗中的可能用途,需要使用多种潜在材料进行体内筛选试验。然而,目前还没有建立适合于此目的的动物模型。有些模型需要对经导管输送的测试材料进行特殊制备,而其他模型则考虑到其成本效益而不合适。本研究的目的是建立一个克服这些局限性的动物模型,帮助我们在临床前评估之前选择潜在的材料。方法手术结扎兔双侧cca,将2 cm的裸铂线圈或聚合物线圈(铂线圈涂覆PLGA 10/90)植入每条盲端动脉段(n = 26)。它们分别在第1、7、10、14或30天收获。血管造影和组织学评估以及定量分析组织血栓的发展。结果铂线圈和PLGA线圈在植入1天后均被动脉段血流停滞所致的未成熟血栓包围。在第7天,两种材料周围都观察到最小的血栓组织。在移植后第10天和第14天,观察到两种材料组的纤维细胞反应,即血栓形成过程的早期发现。与铂线圈组相比,PLGA线圈组的组织学表现更为突出(第10天,P = 0.051;第14天,P = 0.011)。两种材料组在第30天均有组织良好的血栓形成,差异无统计学意义(P = .12)。结论该动物模型具有成本效益高、材料制备工艺简单、组织学评价方法可行等特点,可为开发新型线圈装置筛选其他潜在的生物材料提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Neurology
Surgical Neurology 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信