Almut Zeeck, Jörn von Wietersheim, Armin Hartmann, Sanna Einsele, Heinz Weiss, Isa Sammet, Ekkehard Gaus, Eckart Semm, Dirk Harms, Andrea Eisenberg, Roland Rahm, Joachim Küchenhoff
{"title":"Inpatient or day clinic treatment? Results of a multi-site-study.","authors":"Almut Zeeck, Jörn von Wietersheim, Armin Hartmann, Sanna Einsele, Heinz Weiss, Isa Sammet, Ekkehard Gaus, Eckart Semm, Dirk Harms, Andrea Eisenberg, Roland Rahm, Joachim Küchenhoff","doi":"10.3205/psm000059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This naturalistic study aimed to identify criteria which are of relevance for making a decision as to whether inpatient or day hospital treatment is indicated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 567 patients who were consecutively admitted to 10 departments of psychosomatic medicine (day hospital or inpatient setting) in Germany, symptom severity at admission and discharge was measured (Symptom-Check-List-90-R, Global Assessment of Functioning). Before admission, clinicians rated aspects that might be important for differential indication (Rating Scale of Indication Criteria). A regression analysis was conducted to reveal relationships between outcome in each setting and possible predictors (criteria of relevance).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At admission inpatients and day clinic patients already showed some differences referring to aspects clinicians used to select patients for each setting. Good outcome in day hospital patients was associated with a high motivation and higher burdens at home, whereas reduced drive and loss of interest was correlated with a less favourable course. Inpatients did less well if their symptoms were triggered by situations at home and if they showed a high potential for regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RESULTS give first hints for criteria which are relevant for making a decision between inpatient and day hospital treatment in psychosomatic medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":"Doc03"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/97/PSM-06-03.PMC2775197.pdf","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Abstract
Objective: This naturalistic study aimed to identify criteria which are of relevance for making a decision as to whether inpatient or day hospital treatment is indicated.
Methods: In 567 patients who were consecutively admitted to 10 departments of psychosomatic medicine (day hospital or inpatient setting) in Germany, symptom severity at admission and discharge was measured (Symptom-Check-List-90-R, Global Assessment of Functioning). Before admission, clinicians rated aspects that might be important for differential indication (Rating Scale of Indication Criteria). A regression analysis was conducted to reveal relationships between outcome in each setting and possible predictors (criteria of relevance).
Results: At admission inpatients and day clinic patients already showed some differences referring to aspects clinicians used to select patients for each setting. Good outcome in day hospital patients was associated with a high motivation and higher burdens at home, whereas reduced drive and loss of interest was correlated with a less favourable course. Inpatients did less well if their symptoms were triggered by situations at home and if they showed a high potential for regression.
Conclusion: RESULTS give first hints for criteria which are relevant for making a decision between inpatient and day hospital treatment in psychosomatic medicine.
目的:本自然主义研究旨在确定与决定是否需要住院或日间住院治疗相关的标准。方法:对德国10个心身内科(日间医院或住院)连续住院的567例患者进行入院和出院时的症状严重程度测量(symptom - check - list -90- r, Global Assessment of Functioning)。入院前,临床医生对可能对鉴别指征很重要的方面进行评分(指征标准评定量表)。进行回归分析以揭示每种情况下的结果与可能的预测因子(相关性标准)之间的关系。结果:住院患者和日间门诊患者在临床医生选择患者时已经表现出一定的差异。日间医院患者的良好结果与高动力和高负担相关,而动力降低和失去兴趣与不太有利的过程相关。如果他们的症状是由家里的情况引发的,如果他们表现出很高的回归潜力,住院病人的表现就不太好。结论:结果初步提示了心身医学选择住院治疗还是日间住院治疗的相关标准。