Inpatient or day clinic treatment? Results of a multi-site-study.

Almut Zeeck, Jörn von Wietersheim, Armin Hartmann, Sanna Einsele, Heinz Weiss, Isa Sammet, Ekkehard Gaus, Eckart Semm, Dirk Harms, Andrea Eisenberg, Roland Rahm, Joachim Küchenhoff
{"title":"Inpatient or day clinic treatment? Results of a multi-site-study.","authors":"Almut Zeeck,&nbsp;Jörn von Wietersheim,&nbsp;Armin Hartmann,&nbsp;Sanna Einsele,&nbsp;Heinz Weiss,&nbsp;Isa Sammet,&nbsp;Ekkehard Gaus,&nbsp;Eckart Semm,&nbsp;Dirk Harms,&nbsp;Andrea Eisenberg,&nbsp;Roland Rahm,&nbsp;Joachim Küchenhoff","doi":"10.3205/psm000059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This naturalistic study aimed to identify criteria which are of relevance for making a decision as to whether inpatient or day hospital treatment is indicated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 567 patients who were consecutively admitted to 10 departments of psychosomatic medicine (day hospital or inpatient setting) in Germany, symptom severity at admission and discharge was measured (Symptom-Check-List-90-R, Global Assessment of Functioning). Before admission, clinicians rated aspects that might be important for differential indication (Rating Scale of Indication Criteria). A regression analysis was conducted to reveal relationships between outcome in each setting and possible predictors (criteria of relevance).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At admission inpatients and day clinic patients already showed some differences referring to aspects clinicians used to select patients for each setting. Good outcome in day hospital patients was associated with a high motivation and higher burdens at home, whereas reduced drive and loss of interest was correlated with a less favourable course. Inpatients did less well if their symptoms were triggered by situations at home and if they showed a high potential for regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RESULTS give first hints for criteria which are relevant for making a decision between inpatient and day hospital treatment in psychosomatic medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":"Doc03"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/97/PSM-06-03.PMC2775197.pdf","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Objective: This naturalistic study aimed to identify criteria which are of relevance for making a decision as to whether inpatient or day hospital treatment is indicated.

Methods: In 567 patients who were consecutively admitted to 10 departments of psychosomatic medicine (day hospital or inpatient setting) in Germany, symptom severity at admission and discharge was measured (Symptom-Check-List-90-R, Global Assessment of Functioning). Before admission, clinicians rated aspects that might be important for differential indication (Rating Scale of Indication Criteria). A regression analysis was conducted to reveal relationships between outcome in each setting and possible predictors (criteria of relevance).

Results: At admission inpatients and day clinic patients already showed some differences referring to aspects clinicians used to select patients for each setting. Good outcome in day hospital patients was associated with a high motivation and higher burdens at home, whereas reduced drive and loss of interest was correlated with a less favourable course. Inpatients did less well if their symptoms were triggered by situations at home and if they showed a high potential for regression.

Conclusion: RESULTS give first hints for criteria which are relevant for making a decision between inpatient and day hospital treatment in psychosomatic medicine.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

住院还是日间门诊?多地点研究的结果。
目的:本自然主义研究旨在确定与决定是否需要住院或日间住院治疗相关的标准。方法:对德国10个心身内科(日间医院或住院)连续住院的567例患者进行入院和出院时的症状严重程度测量(symptom - check - list -90- r, Global Assessment of Functioning)。入院前,临床医生对可能对鉴别指征很重要的方面进行评分(指征标准评定量表)。进行回归分析以揭示每种情况下的结果与可能的预测因子(相关性标准)之间的关系。结果:住院患者和日间门诊患者在临床医生选择患者时已经表现出一定的差异。日间医院患者的良好结果与高动力和高负担相关,而动力降低和失去兴趣与不太有利的过程相关。如果他们的症状是由家里的情况引发的,如果他们表现出很高的回归潜力,住院病人的表现就不太好。结论:结果初步提示了心身医学选择住院治疗还是日间住院治疗的相关标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书