Recording of dissimulation and denial in the context of the psychosomatic evaluation at living kidney transplantation using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI).

Uwe Wutzler, Margit Venner, Thomas Villmann, Oliver Decker, Undine Ott, Thomas Steiner, Antje Gumz
{"title":"Recording of dissimulation and denial in the context of the psychosomatic evaluation at living kidney transplantation using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI).","authors":"Uwe Wutzler,&nbsp;Margit Venner,&nbsp;Thomas Villmann,&nbsp;Oliver Decker,&nbsp;Undine Ott,&nbsp;Thomas Steiner,&nbsp;Antje Gumz","doi":"10.3205/psm000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Living organ donation involves interference with a healthy organism. Therefore, most transplantation centres ascertain the voluntariness of the donation as well as its motivation by means of a psychosomatic evaluation. The circumstance that the evaluation is compulsory and not a primary concern of the donor-recipient pair may occasion respondents to present only what they consider innocuous and socially adequate. Thus, the information value of the results can be considerably affected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the context of a psychosomatic evaluation prior to living kidney transplantation, 71 donor-recipient pairs were screened at the transplantation centre of Friedrich Schiller University, Jena. Using the validity scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) (\"infrequency\" (F), \"lie\" (L) and \"correction-scales\" (K)) and the Dissimulation Index according to Gough (\"F-K\"), we tried to find traits of dissimulation and denial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 50% of the participants showed an infrequency raw score of zero. This means that at least half of the sample is apprehensive which may cause a cautious and controlled attitude towards the examination. The K-value (T>/=59) and the Dissimulation Index (F-K</=-15) indicated dissimulation in 29% and 26% of the overall sample. Moreover, it affects the score of 11 respondents (8%) so profoundly that any significance regarding the personality traits is lost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the setup of the examination situation as well as in the interpretation of test-psychological findings, the occurrence and possible influence of dissimulation should be considered. The validity scale of the MMPI can help to obtain an objective clinical impression of dissimulation in problem cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":"Doc04"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0b/03/PSM-06-04.PMC2775195.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: Living organ donation involves interference with a healthy organism. Therefore, most transplantation centres ascertain the voluntariness of the donation as well as its motivation by means of a psychosomatic evaluation. The circumstance that the evaluation is compulsory and not a primary concern of the donor-recipient pair may occasion respondents to present only what they consider innocuous and socially adequate. Thus, the information value of the results can be considerably affected.

Methods: In the context of a psychosomatic evaluation prior to living kidney transplantation, 71 donor-recipient pairs were screened at the transplantation centre of Friedrich Schiller University, Jena. Using the validity scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) ("infrequency" (F), "lie" (L) and "correction-scales" (K)) and the Dissimulation Index according to Gough ("F-K"), we tried to find traits of dissimulation and denial.

Results: About 50% of the participants showed an infrequency raw score of zero. This means that at least half of the sample is apprehensive which may cause a cautious and controlled attitude towards the examination. The K-value (T>/=59) and the Dissimulation Index (F-K

Conclusion: In the setup of the examination situation as well as in the interpretation of test-psychological findings, the occurrence and possible influence of dissimulation should be considered. The validity scale of the MMPI can help to obtain an objective clinical impression of dissimulation in problem cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用明尼苏达多相人格量表(MMPI)记录活体肾移植心身评估中掩饰和否认的情况。
目的:活体器官捐献涉及对健康机体的干扰。因此,大多数移植中心通过心身评估来确定捐赠的自愿性及其动机。评估是强制性的,而不是供体-受者对主要关注的情况可能导致答复者只提出他们认为无害和社会适当的东西。因此,结果的信息价值会受到很大影响。方法:在活体肾移植前进行心身评估的背景下,在耶拿弗里德里希·席勒大学移植中心筛选了71对供体-受体。利用明尼苏达多相人格量表(MMPI)的效度量表(“不频繁”(F)、“谎言”(L)和“纠正量表”(K))和Gough的伪装指数(F -K),我们试图找到伪装和否认的特征。结果:约50%的参与者表现出罕见的原始得分为零。这意味着至少有一半的样本是忧虑的,这可能导致对考试的谨慎和控制的态度。k值(T>/=59)和伪装指数(f - k)结论:在设置考试情境和解释测试心理结果时,应考虑伪装的发生及其可能产生的影响。MMPI效度量表有助于在问题病例中获得客观的临床伪装印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书