Attitudes of patients and mental health staff to antipsychotic long-acting injections: systematic review.

Linda Waddell, Mark Taylor
{"title":"Attitudes of patients and mental health staff to antipsychotic long-acting injections: systematic review.","authors":"Linda Waddell, Mark Taylor","doi":"10.1192/bjp.195.52.s43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The attitudes of staff and patients have been demonstrated to influence the acceptance of long-acting injections (LAIs) or depot antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the attitudes of patients and staff to LAIs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was carried out. Studies included contained quantitative data for attitudes of patients or staff to LAIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies published subsequent to the systematic review reported in 2001 were identified. Five studies conveyed an overall positive attitude. The most positive attitudes among patients were seen in those already prescribed an LAI. Positive attitudes of staff correlated closely with the extent of their knowledge of LAIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-acting injections continue to have an image problem, arguably perpetuated by manufacturers of oral second-generation antipsychotic drugs, and exacerbated by the predominant use of these medications as a ;last resort' often for the most stigmatized individuals. The introduction of better-tolerated LAIs and better education of both staff and patients may encourage individuals to re-examine their attitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":77411,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of psychiatry. Supplement","volume":"52 ","pages":"S43-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of psychiatry. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.195.52.s43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The attitudes of staff and patients have been demonstrated to influence the acceptance of long-acting injections (LAIs) or depot antipsychotics.

Aims: To examine the attitudes of patients and staff to LAIs.

Method: A systematic review was carried out. Studies included contained quantitative data for attitudes of patients or staff to LAIs.

Results: Twelve studies published subsequent to the systematic review reported in 2001 were identified. Five studies conveyed an overall positive attitude. The most positive attitudes among patients were seen in those already prescribed an LAI. Positive attitudes of staff correlated closely with the extent of their knowledge of LAIs.

Conclusions: Long-acting injections continue to have an image problem, arguably perpetuated by manufacturers of oral second-generation antipsychotic drugs, and exacerbated by the predominant use of these medications as a ;last resort' often for the most stigmatized individuals. The introduction of better-tolerated LAIs and better education of both staff and patients may encourage individuals to re-examine their attitudes.

患者和精神卫生人员对长效抗精神病药物注射的态度:系统回顾。
背景:工作人员和患者的态度已被证明影响长效注射剂或储备抗精神病药物的接受程度。目的:了解患者和医护人员对人工智能的态度。方法:进行系统评价。研究包括患者或工作人员对人工智能的态度的定量数据。结果:在2001年的系统评价报告之后发表的12项研究被确定。五项研究传达了总体积极的态度。患者中态度最积极的是那些已经开了LAI的患者。员工的积极态度与他们对lai的了解程度密切相关。结论:长效注射剂仍然存在形象问题,可以说是由口服第二代抗精神病药物的制造商造成的,并且由于这些药物作为“最后手段”经常用于最受歧视的个体而加剧。引入耐受性更好的lai以及对工作人员和患者进行更好的教育可能会鼓励个人重新审视他们的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书