[Anti-oxidants, controversies and perspectives: how can the failure of clinical studies using anti-oxidants be explained?].

Journal de la Societe de biologie Pub Date : 2009-01-01 Epub Date: 2009-10-16 DOI:10.1051/jbio:2009031
Marvin Edeas
{"title":"[Anti-oxidants, controversies and perspectives: how can the failure of clinical studies using anti-oxidants be explained?].","authors":"Marvin Edeas","doi":"10.1051/jbio:2009031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since several decades anti-oxidants have been much studied, and scientists have tried to prove the preventive and curative effects in many chronic diseases. However, it is not uncommon to find highly contradictory clinical results, which may explain that consumers are less enthusiastic for anti-oxidants food supplements. First of all, definitions should be reviewed, such as that of free radicals (FR); all of them are not toxic. Some of them, such as nitric oxide, are necessary for the proper physiological functioning of the body, and eliminating them would be a mistake! However, other reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are not FR, are toxic, such as hydrogen peroxide. We have also redefined the oxidative stress, which it is not only the result of an imbalance between oxidants and anti-oxidants, but also the consequence of imbalance in the cellular redox status. The mechanisms of action, bioavailability, synergy and methods to determine the level of anti-oxidants are very sensitive topics, and it is crucial to study them if we want to obtain reliable clinical studies. Given the failure of clinical studies about anti-oxidant, we try to explain strategies which should be followed. First of all, the nature of the anti-oxidant is important; and an anti-oxidant from a natural origin must be preferred. Then, we proposed that the dose-effect was certainly responsible for the failure of tests. Indeed, doses administered in the studies was either too weak to obtain significant results, or too high, becoming pro-oxidative and eliminating the basal concentration of ROS (physiological role). Involvement of mitochondria and glycation are particularly discussed. Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics are also discussed, which study the interactions between genetics and nutrition. Genetic polymorphism can explain the variable absorption of micronutrients. This concept leads to a truth believed by all scientists, namely the need to provide the right anti-oxidant, in adequate quantity, at the right place, at the right time and for a particular individual. To increase the anti-oxidant capacity of the body, the exogenous intake of anti-oxidants must be increased or the endogenous synthesis of anti-oxidants (SOD, GPX, GSH) must be stimulated. Targeting mitochondria and increasing their overall anti-oxidant defence system will be a challenge. Increasing the bioavailability of anti-oxidants and studying their passage through the blood-brain barrier must be also taken in consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":80018,"journal":{"name":"Journal de la Societe de biologie","volume":"203 3","pages":"271-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1051/jbio:2009031","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de la Societe de biologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio:2009031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Since several decades anti-oxidants have been much studied, and scientists have tried to prove the preventive and curative effects in many chronic diseases. However, it is not uncommon to find highly contradictory clinical results, which may explain that consumers are less enthusiastic for anti-oxidants food supplements. First of all, definitions should be reviewed, such as that of free radicals (FR); all of them are not toxic. Some of them, such as nitric oxide, are necessary for the proper physiological functioning of the body, and eliminating them would be a mistake! However, other reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are not FR, are toxic, such as hydrogen peroxide. We have also redefined the oxidative stress, which it is not only the result of an imbalance between oxidants and anti-oxidants, but also the consequence of imbalance in the cellular redox status. The mechanisms of action, bioavailability, synergy and methods to determine the level of anti-oxidants are very sensitive topics, and it is crucial to study them if we want to obtain reliable clinical studies. Given the failure of clinical studies about anti-oxidant, we try to explain strategies which should be followed. First of all, the nature of the anti-oxidant is important; and an anti-oxidant from a natural origin must be preferred. Then, we proposed that the dose-effect was certainly responsible for the failure of tests. Indeed, doses administered in the studies was either too weak to obtain significant results, or too high, becoming pro-oxidative and eliminating the basal concentration of ROS (physiological role). Involvement of mitochondria and glycation are particularly discussed. Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics are also discussed, which study the interactions between genetics and nutrition. Genetic polymorphism can explain the variable absorption of micronutrients. This concept leads to a truth believed by all scientists, namely the need to provide the right anti-oxidant, in adequate quantity, at the right place, at the right time and for a particular individual. To increase the anti-oxidant capacity of the body, the exogenous intake of anti-oxidants must be increased or the endogenous synthesis of anti-oxidants (SOD, GPX, GSH) must be stimulated. Targeting mitochondria and increasing their overall anti-oxidant defence system will be a challenge. Increasing the bioavailability of anti-oxidants and studying their passage through the blood-brain barrier must be also taken in consideration.

[抗氧化剂,争议和观点:如何解释使用抗氧化剂的临床研究失败?]。
几十年来,人们对抗氧化剂进行了大量的研究,科学家们试图证明抗氧化剂对许多慢性疾病的预防和治疗作用。然而,发现高度矛盾的临床结果并不罕见,这可能解释了消费者对抗氧化剂食品补充剂的热情不高。首先,需要对其定义进行回顾,如自由基(FR)的定义;它们都不是有毒的。其中一些,如一氧化氮,是身体正常生理功能所必需的,消除它们将是一个错误!然而,其他不是FR的活性氧(ROS)是有毒的,例如过氧化氢。我们还重新定义了氧化应激,它不仅是氧化剂和抗氧化剂之间不平衡的结果,也是细胞氧化还原状态不平衡的结果。抗氧化剂的作用机制、生物利用度、协同作用和测定抗氧化剂水平的方法是非常敏感的话题,如果我们想要获得可靠的临床研究,对它们进行研究是至关重要的。鉴于抗氧化剂临床研究的失败,我们试图解释应该遵循的策略。首先,抗氧化剂的性质很重要;最好是天然的抗氧化剂。然后,我们提出剂量效应肯定是导致试验失败的原因。事实上,在研究中使用的剂量要么太弱而无法获得显著的结果,要么太高,会促进氧化并消除ROS的基础浓度(生理作用)。特别讨论了线粒体和糖基化的参与。还讨论了营养基因组学和营养遗传学,它们研究遗传与营养之间的相互作用。遗传多态性可以解释微量营养素吸收的变化。这一概念引出了一个所有科学家都相信的真理,即需要在正确的地点、正确的时间、为特定的个体提供适量的正确的抗氧化剂。为了提高机体的抗氧化能力,必须增加外源性抗氧化剂的摄入或刺激内源性抗氧化剂(SOD、GPX、GSH)的合成。以线粒体为目标并增强其整体抗氧化防御系统将是一个挑战。提高抗氧化剂的生物利用度和研究它们通过血脑屏障的途径也必须考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信