MATRIX - development and feasibility of a guide for quality assessment of patient decision aids.

Psycho-social medicine Pub Date : 2007-08-29
Matthias Lenz, Jürgen Kasper
{"title":"MATRIX - development and feasibility of a guide for quality assessment of patient decision aids.","authors":"Matthias Lenz,&nbsp;Jürgen Kasper","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decision aids (DAs) are interventions designed to help people make specific and deliberative choices among options by providing information about the options and outcomes that is relevant to a person's health status.There is an ongoing discussion about the quality of DAs. The present article provides an overview on systematic approaches using various quality criteria. However, these evaluation guides are not yet implemented. Up to now quality assessment of DAs is often limited to the evidence on efficacy through controlled trials using single-outcome measures. Since DAs are multi-component interventions, single-outcome trials are not sufficient for complete quality assessment. Consideration of theoretical founding and the development process is required. In an earlier paper we proposed a novel concept of quality to meet this challenge. We introduced MATRIX a guide for quality assessment of DAs aimed at disclosing the rationale behind underpinning theories, methods, and goals of a DA. The present paper reports how the development of MATRIX progressed including results of pre-testing and a feasibility study. We present the revised version of MATRIX, explain its basic concept, and describe the way to use it.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"4 ","pages":"Doc09"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/81/5c/PSM-04-09.PMC2736522.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision aids (DAs) are interventions designed to help people make specific and deliberative choices among options by providing information about the options and outcomes that is relevant to a person's health status.There is an ongoing discussion about the quality of DAs. The present article provides an overview on systematic approaches using various quality criteria. However, these evaluation guides are not yet implemented. Up to now quality assessment of DAs is often limited to the evidence on efficacy through controlled trials using single-outcome measures. Since DAs are multi-component interventions, single-outcome trials are not sufficient for complete quality assessment. Consideration of theoretical founding and the development process is required. In an earlier paper we proposed a novel concept of quality to meet this challenge. We introduced MATRIX a guide for quality assessment of DAs aimed at disclosing the rationale behind underpinning theories, methods, and goals of a DA. The present paper reports how the development of MATRIX progressed including results of pre-testing and a feasibility study. We present the revised version of MATRIX, explain its basic concept, and describe the way to use it.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

MATRIX -患者决策辅助工具质量评估指南的开发和可行性。
辅助决策是一种干预措施,旨在通过提供与个人健康状况有关的各种选择和结果的信息,帮助人们在各种选择中作出具体和审慎的选择。关于DAs质量的讨论正在进行中。本文概述了使用各种质量标准的系统方法。但是,这些评价指南尚未实施。到目前为止,DAs的质量评估通常仅限于通过使用单一结果测量的对照试验对疗效的证据。由于DAs是多组分干预措施,单结果试验不足以进行完整的质量评估。需要考虑理论的建立和发展过程。在之前的一篇论文中,我们提出了一个新的质量概念来应对这一挑战。我们介绍了MATRIX,这是一个用于数据分析质量评估的指南,旨在揭示数据分析的基础理论、方法和目标背后的基本原理。本文件报告了MATRIX的开发进展情况,包括预测试和可行性研究的结果。我们介绍了MATRIX的修订版,解释了它的基本概念,并描述了它的使用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书