Medical and licit drug use in an urban/rural study population with a refugee background, 7-8 years into resettlement.

Psycho-social medicine Pub Date : 2008-04-23
Karin Johansson Blight, Jan-Olov Persson, Solvig Ekblad, Jan Ekberg
{"title":"Medical and licit drug use in an urban/rural study population with a refugee background, 7-8 years into resettlement.","authors":"Karin Johansson Blight,&nbsp;Jan-Olov Persson,&nbsp;Solvig Ekblad,&nbsp;Jan Ekberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research into medical and licit drug use in resettled refugee populations is scarce, despite the fact that mental health status often has been found to be poorer than in general populations. Hence the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of self-rated use of medicine and licit drugs among adults who came to Sweden from Bosnia-Herzegovina (1993/94) and who in 2001 were living in either an urban (low employment context) or a rural (high employment context) region (n=4185).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prevalence was estimated from a cross-sectional questionnaire distributed to a representative sample (n=650) in 2001 (63.5% response rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population estimates of usage of sedatives (26.5%), sleeping tablets (26.2%) and antidepressants (22.3%) did not differ by gender but did so by region, with a higher urban prevalence. The consumption of alcohol (5.1%) and cigarettes (41.0%) did not differ by region but men reported higher alcohol consumption than women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high consumption of medicine (compared with general populations) raises the question of treatment efficiency and the need for public health attention and evaluation many years after resettlement. Factors to consider for further research with analytic prerequisites concern indications that regional differences may be influenced, not only by urban employment being lower but also by urban/rural differences in prescription rates and/or access to health care; moreover, there might have been a selection to the urban region of older people, with a more vulnerable family situation, and/or poorer mental health. Finally, the overall alcohol (low) and cigarettes (high) consumption in the study population followed prevalence patterns found in Bosnia-Herzegovina rather than in Sweden.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Doc04"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/0e/PSM-05-04.PMC2736521.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Research into medical and licit drug use in resettled refugee populations is scarce, despite the fact that mental health status often has been found to be poorer than in general populations. Hence the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of self-rated use of medicine and licit drugs among adults who came to Sweden from Bosnia-Herzegovina (1993/94) and who in 2001 were living in either an urban (low employment context) or a rural (high employment context) region (n=4185).

Methods: Prevalence was estimated from a cross-sectional questionnaire distributed to a representative sample (n=650) in 2001 (63.5% response rate).

Results: The study population estimates of usage of sedatives (26.5%), sleeping tablets (26.2%) and antidepressants (22.3%) did not differ by gender but did so by region, with a higher urban prevalence. The consumption of alcohol (5.1%) and cigarettes (41.0%) did not differ by region but men reported higher alcohol consumption than women.

Conclusion: The high consumption of medicine (compared with general populations) raises the question of treatment efficiency and the need for public health attention and evaluation many years after resettlement. Factors to consider for further research with analytic prerequisites concern indications that regional differences may be influenced, not only by urban employment being lower but also by urban/rural differences in prescription rates and/or access to health care; moreover, there might have been a selection to the urban region of older people, with a more vulnerable family situation, and/or poorer mental health. Finally, the overall alcohol (low) and cigarettes (high) consumption in the study population followed prevalence patterns found in Bosnia-Herzegovina rather than in Sweden.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在重新安置7-8年后具有难民背景的城市/农村研究人口中的医疗和合法药物使用情况。
目的:对重新安置的难民人口的医疗和合法药物使用情况的研究很少,尽管发现他们的精神健康状况往往比一般人口差。因此,本研究的目的是估计从波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那(1993/94)来到瑞典的成年人(2001年生活在城市(低就业环境)或农村(高就业环境)地区的成年人(n=4185)自评药物和合法药物使用的流行程度。方法:2001年对代表性样本(n=650)进行横断面问卷调查(回复率63.5%),估计患病率。结果:研究人群对镇静剂(26.5%)、安眠药(26.2%)和抗抑郁药(22.3%)使用情况的估计没有性别差异,但有地区差异,城市患病率较高。酒精(5.1%)和香烟(41.0%)的消费量在地区之间没有差异,但男性报告的酒精消费量高于女性。结论:与一般人群相比,药物的高消耗提出了治疗效率问题,需要在移民多年后进行公共卫生关注和评估。在具备分析先决条件的情况下,进一步研究需要考虑的因素涉及区域差异可能受到影响的迹象,不仅城市就业率较低,而且城乡在处方率和(或)获得保健服务方面的差异;此外,城市地区可能选择了家庭状况较脆弱和/或精神健康状况较差的老年人。最后,研究人群的总体酒精(低)和香烟(高)消费量遵循波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那而不是瑞典的流行模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书