Psychosocial determinants for frequent primary health care utilisation in patients with heart failure.

Psycho-social medicine Pub Date : 2008-04-02
Martin Scherer, Wolfgang Himmel, Michael M Kochen, Janka Koschack, Dirk Ahrens, Jean-Francois Chenot, Anne Simmenroth-Nayda, Christoph Herrmann-Lingen
{"title":"Psychosocial determinants for frequent primary health care utilisation in patients with heart failure.","authors":"Martin Scherer,&nbsp;Wolfgang Himmel,&nbsp;Michael M Kochen,&nbsp;Janka Koschack,&nbsp;Dirk Ahrens,&nbsp;Jean-Francois Chenot,&nbsp;Anne Simmenroth-Nayda,&nbsp;Christoph Herrmann-Lingen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychosocial symptoms are common in patients with heart failure. Little research, however, has been done to determine which psychosocial factors influence primary care patients' consultation frequency in the case of heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 310 primary care patients with heart failure by analysing electronic patient records. At baseline, psychological distress (anxiety and depression; HADS), disease coping (FKV), negative affectivity and social inhibition (DS-14), disease-specific quality of life (MLHFQ) and social support (F-SozU) were measured by validated questionnaires. Severity of heart failure (according to NYHA-classification and Goldman's Specific Activity Scale) and sociodemographic characteristics were documented by self-report instruments. Nine month later, patients were contacted by telephone in order to assess GP consultation frequency. Logistic regression was done to determine whether these psychological, medical and sociodemographic factors were associated with primary care utilisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, patients consulted their general practitioner (GP) 8.2 times during nine months. Female subjects and patients with higher levels of perceived heart failure severity, physical problems and anxiety or depression as well as those living alone visited their GP significantly more often. In multivariate analysis, frequent attendance in general practices was predicted by physical problems and living alone. These factors explained 11.6% of the variance of frequent attendance in general practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychosocial factors of help-seeking behaviour in heart failure patients focus on mental and physical discomfort and a lonely home situation. These factors might need to be compensated by GP consultation. GPs should address the rearrangement of physical, mental, and social resources to strengthen self-reliance of patients with heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Doc02"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/c4/PSM-05-02.PMC2736514.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Psychosocial symptoms are common in patients with heart failure. Little research, however, has been done to determine which psychosocial factors influence primary care patients' consultation frequency in the case of heart failure.

Methods: We recruited 310 primary care patients with heart failure by analysing electronic patient records. At baseline, psychological distress (anxiety and depression; HADS), disease coping (FKV), negative affectivity and social inhibition (DS-14), disease-specific quality of life (MLHFQ) and social support (F-SozU) were measured by validated questionnaires. Severity of heart failure (according to NYHA-classification and Goldman's Specific Activity Scale) and sociodemographic characteristics were documented by self-report instruments. Nine month later, patients were contacted by telephone in order to assess GP consultation frequency. Logistic regression was done to determine whether these psychological, medical and sociodemographic factors were associated with primary care utilisation.

Results: On average, patients consulted their general practitioner (GP) 8.2 times during nine months. Female subjects and patients with higher levels of perceived heart failure severity, physical problems and anxiety or depression as well as those living alone visited their GP significantly more often. In multivariate analysis, frequent attendance in general practices was predicted by physical problems and living alone. These factors explained 11.6% of the variance of frequent attendance in general practices.

Conclusion: Psychosocial factors of help-seeking behaviour in heart failure patients focus on mental and physical discomfort and a lonely home situation. These factors might need to be compensated by GP consultation. GPs should address the rearrangement of physical, mental, and social resources to strengthen self-reliance of patients with heart failure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心衰患者频繁使用初级卫生保健的社会心理决定因素
目的:心理社会症状在心力衰竭患者中很常见。然而,很少有研究表明,在心力衰竭的情况下,哪些社会心理因素会影响初级保健患者的咨询频率。方法:通过分析电子病历,我们招募了310例心力衰竭的初级保健患者。基线时,心理困扰(焦虑和抑郁;采用有效问卷测量患者的HADS、疾病应对(FKV)、负性情感和社会抑制(DS-14)、疾病特异性生活质量(MLHFQ)和社会支持(F-SozU)。心力衰竭的严重程度(根据nyha分类和高盛特定活动量表)和社会人口学特征通过自我报告工具记录。9个月后,通过电话联系患者,以评估全科医生的咨询频率。通过逻辑回归来确定这些心理、医学和社会人口因素是否与初级保健利用相关。结果:9个月内,患者平均咨询全科医生8.2次。女性受试者、心衰严重程度、身体问题、焦虑或抑郁程度较高的患者以及独居者看全科医生的频率明显更高。在多变量分析中,身体问题和独居预示着频繁的全科就诊。这些因素解释了11.6%的全科就诊频率差异。结论:影响心衰患者求助行为的心理社会因素主要是身心不适和孤独的家庭环境。这些因素可能需要通过全科医生咨询来弥补。全科医生应重新安排身体、精神和社会资源,以加强心力衰竭患者的自力更生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书