The assessment of mood at workplace - psychometric analyses of the revised Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire.

Psycho-social medicine Pub Date : 2007-05-10
Matthias Morfeld, Corinna Petersen, Anja Krüger-Bödeker, Sylvia von Mackensen, Monika Bullinger
{"title":"The assessment of mood at workplace - psychometric analyses of the revised Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire.","authors":"Matthias Morfeld,&nbsp;Corinna Petersen,&nbsp;Anja Krüger-Bödeker,&nbsp;Sylvia von Mackensen,&nbsp;Monika Bullinger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the Profile of Mood States (POMS), a German version of an international instrument for the assessment of mood is available. The paper introduces a new short version containing 24 items and four scales. In a study about indoor climate in 4596 office workers only a few missing values were noted. Psychometric analyses showed very good characteristics of the four scales regarding their internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and scale fit. High floor effects indicated a limited exhaustion of the scale range. Age and gender effects of the scale scores concerned the scales \"vigour\" and \"fatigue\". Furthermore, the scales of the POMS discriminated between groups with different self-reported disease incidences. A less beneficial characteristic of the POMS could be noted in terms of a high correlation of the scales \"numbness\" and \"fatigue\". With the tested version of the POMS, a short instrument with good psychometric properties has been presented which can be assessed in healthy as well as in health-impaired persons.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"4 ","pages":"Doc06"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/02/21/PSM-04-06.PMC2736534.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the Profile of Mood States (POMS), a German version of an international instrument for the assessment of mood is available. The paper introduces a new short version containing 24 items and four scales. In a study about indoor climate in 4596 office workers only a few missing values were noted. Psychometric analyses showed very good characteristics of the four scales regarding their internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and scale fit. High floor effects indicated a limited exhaustion of the scale range. Age and gender effects of the scale scores concerned the scales "vigour" and "fatigue". Furthermore, the scales of the POMS discriminated between groups with different self-reported disease incidences. A less beneficial characteristic of the POMS could be noted in terms of a high correlation of the scales "numbness" and "fatigue". With the tested version of the POMS, a short instrument with good psychometric properties has been presented which can be assessed in healthy as well as in health-impaired persons.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

工作场所的情绪评估——修订后的情绪状态量表(POMS)的心理测量分析。
德国版的心境状态量表(POMS)是一种评估心境的国际工具。本文介绍了一种新的包含24个条目和4个量表的简短版本。在一项针对4596名办公室工作人员的室内气候的研究中,只有几个缺失值被注意到。心理测量分析表明,四个量表在内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha)和量表拟合方面具有很好的特点。高地板效应表明比例尺范围的有限耗尽。年龄和性别对“活力”和“疲劳”量表得分的影响。此外,POMS的量表在自我报告疾病发病率不同的群体之间具有区别。从“麻木”和“疲劳”量表高度相关的角度来看,可以注意到POMS的一个不太有益的特征。通过POMS的测试版本,提出了一种具有良好心理测量特性的简短工具,可以对健康者和健康受损者进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书