Are fear-avoidance beliefs in low back pain patients a risk factor for low physical activity or vice versa? A cross-lagged panel analysis.

Corinna Leonhardt, Dirk Lehr, Jean-François Chenot, Stefan Keller, Judith Luckmann, Heinz-Dieter Basler, Erika Baum, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Michael Pfingsten, Jan Hildebrandt, Michael M Kochen, Annette Becker
{"title":"Are fear-avoidance beliefs in low back pain patients a risk factor for low physical activity or vice versa? A cross-lagged panel analysis.","authors":"Corinna Leonhardt,&nbsp;Dirk Lehr,&nbsp;Jean-François Chenot,&nbsp;Stefan Keller,&nbsp;Judith Luckmann,&nbsp;Heinz-Dieter Basler,&nbsp;Erika Baum,&nbsp;Norbert Donner-Banzhoff,&nbsp;Michael Pfingsten,&nbsp;Jan Hildebrandt,&nbsp;Michael M Kochen,&nbsp;Annette Becker","doi":"10.3205/psm000057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The assumption that low back pain (LBP) patients suffer from \"disuse\" as a consequence of high fear-avoidance beliefs is currently under debate. A secondary analysis served to investigate whether fear-avoidance beliefs are associated cross-sectionally and longitudinally with the physical activity level (PAL) in LBP patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 787 individuals (57% acute and 43% chronic LBP) were followed up over a period of one year with measurements of fear-avoidance beliefs and physical activity level. Fear-avoidance beliefs concerning physical activity were measured by the physical-activity subscale of the FABQ (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire), the physical activity level was assessed in weighted metabolic equivalents (MET) hours/week with a German self-report questionnaire. Data were investigated by structural equation modelling in a cross-lagged panel design for the whole sample and separately for acute and chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The acute and chronic sub sample increased their total physical activity level significantly after one year. The structural equation modelling results did not support the disuse-aspect inherent in the fear-avoidance belief model. Cross-lagged path coefficients were low (.04 and .05 respectively) and, therefore, did not allow to predict final physical activity by initial fear-avoidance beliefs or vice versa.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consequently, due to missing links between fear-avoidance beliefs and physical activity in a longitudinal design, the assumptions of the fear-avoidance belief model have to be questioned. These findings are in line with other investigations published recently. Most probably, \"fear-avoidance belief\" represents a cognitive scheme that does not limit activity per se, but only is directed to the avoidance of specific movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":"Doc01"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/01/PSM-06-01.PMC2736477.pdf","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Objective: The assumption that low back pain (LBP) patients suffer from "disuse" as a consequence of high fear-avoidance beliefs is currently under debate. A secondary analysis served to investigate whether fear-avoidance beliefs are associated cross-sectionally and longitudinally with the physical activity level (PAL) in LBP patients.

Methods: A total of 787 individuals (57% acute and 43% chronic LBP) were followed up over a period of one year with measurements of fear-avoidance beliefs and physical activity level. Fear-avoidance beliefs concerning physical activity were measured by the physical-activity subscale of the FABQ (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire), the physical activity level was assessed in weighted metabolic equivalents (MET) hours/week with a German self-report questionnaire. Data were investigated by structural equation modelling in a cross-lagged panel design for the whole sample and separately for acute and chronic LBP.

Results: The acute and chronic sub sample increased their total physical activity level significantly after one year. The structural equation modelling results did not support the disuse-aspect inherent in the fear-avoidance belief model. Cross-lagged path coefficients were low (.04 and .05 respectively) and, therefore, did not allow to predict final physical activity by initial fear-avoidance beliefs or vice versa.

Discussion: Consequently, due to missing links between fear-avoidance beliefs and physical activity in a longitudinal design, the assumptions of the fear-avoidance belief model have to be questioned. These findings are in line with other investigations published recently. Most probably, "fear-avoidance belief" represents a cognitive scheme that does not limit activity per se, but only is directed to the avoidance of specific movements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腰痛患者的恐惧回避信念是低体力活动的危险因素,反之亦然?交叉滞后面板分析。
目的:腰痛(LBP)患者由于高度的恐惧回避信念而遭受“弃用”的假设目前正在争论中。二级分析用于调查恐惧回避信念是否与LBP患者的身体活动水平(PAL)在横断面和纵向上相关。方法:对787例LBP患者(57%为急性LBP, 43%为慢性LBP)进行为期一年的随访,测量其恐惧回避信念和身体活动水平。采用FABQ (Fear-avoidance beliefs Questionnaire)的身体活动子量表测量与身体活动有关的恐惧回避信念,采用德国自我报告问卷以加权代谢当量(MET)小时/周评估身体活动水平。数据通过结构方程模型在交叉滞后面板设计中对整个样本进行了调查,并分别对急性和慢性腰痛进行了调查。结果:急性亚样本和慢性亚样本的总体力活动水平在1年后显著提高。结构方程建模结果不支持恐惧回避信念模型固有的无用方面。交叉滞后路径系数较低。04和0.05),因此,不能通过最初的恐惧回避信念来预测最终的体育活动,反之亦然。讨论:因此,在纵向设计中,由于恐惧回避信念和身体活动之间缺少联系,恐惧回避信念模型的假设必须受到质疑。这些发现与最近发表的其他调查结果一致。最有可能的是,“恐惧回避信念”代表了一种认知方案,它不限制活动本身,而只是直接避免特定的动作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书