Do psychological characteristics predict response to exercise and advice for subacute low back pain?

Rob J E M Smeets, Chris G Maher, Michael K Nicholas, Kathy M Refshauge, Robert D Herbert
{"title":"Do psychological characteristics predict response to exercise and advice for subacute low back pain?","authors":"Rob J E M Smeets,&nbsp;Chris G Maher,&nbsp;Michael K Nicholas,&nbsp;Kathy M Refshauge,&nbsp;Robert D Herbert","doi":"10.1002/art.24731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether psychological characteristics predict outcome and/or response to physiotherapist-directed exercise- or advice-based treatment of subacute low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a factorial, placebo-controlled trial (n = 259). The psychological characteristics were catastrophizing, coping, pain self-efficacy, fear of injury/movement, depression, anxiety, and stress. We used mixed models to predict pain and function outcomes (both scored on a 0-10 scale). The models include a term for treatment group, a term for the psychological characteristic (which tested prediction of outcome), and an interaction term between the treatment group and psychological characteristic (which tested treatment effect modification). To aid the interpretation of the magnitude of the effect modification, we calculated the change in outcome for a 1 SD increase of the baseline score of the putative effect modifier. A >/=1.5-point change of the outcome of interest per 1 SD change of putative effect modifier was regarded as clinically important.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the psychological characteristics except coping predicted outcome, but none appeared to be important treatment effect modifiers. Only 5 of the 56 tests of treatment modification were statistically significant, and none of the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the interactions included clinically important effects. For example, a 1 SD higher baseline level of anxiety was associated with a 0.62 (95% CI 0.10, 1.15) additional effect of exercise on function at 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the psychological characteristics we tested predicted outcome, but none predicted response to physiotherapist-guided exercise and/or advice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8405,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis and rheumatism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/art.24731","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether psychological characteristics predict outcome and/or response to physiotherapist-directed exercise- or advice-based treatment of subacute low back pain.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a factorial, placebo-controlled trial (n = 259). The psychological characteristics were catastrophizing, coping, pain self-efficacy, fear of injury/movement, depression, anxiety, and stress. We used mixed models to predict pain and function outcomes (both scored on a 0-10 scale). The models include a term for treatment group, a term for the psychological characteristic (which tested prediction of outcome), and an interaction term between the treatment group and psychological characteristic (which tested treatment effect modification). To aid the interpretation of the magnitude of the effect modification, we calculated the change in outcome for a 1 SD increase of the baseline score of the putative effect modifier. A >/=1.5-point change of the outcome of interest per 1 SD change of putative effect modifier was regarded as clinically important.

Results: All of the psychological characteristics except coping predicted outcome, but none appeared to be important treatment effect modifiers. Only 5 of the 56 tests of treatment modification were statistically significant, and none of the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the interactions included clinically important effects. For example, a 1 SD higher baseline level of anxiety was associated with a 0.62 (95% CI 0.10, 1.15) additional effect of exercise on function at 52 weeks.

Conclusion: Most of the psychological characteristics we tested predicted outcome, but none predicted response to physiotherapist-guided exercise and/or advice.

心理特征能预测运动的反应和亚急性腰痛的建议吗?
目的:确定心理特征是否能预测亚急性腰痛的结果和/或对物理治疗师指导的运动或基于建议的治疗的反应。方法:我们对一项析因、安慰剂对照试验(n = 259)进行了二次分析。心理特征为灾难化、应对、疼痛自我效能、对伤害/运动的恐惧、抑郁、焦虑和压力。我们使用混合模型来预测疼痛和功能结果(两者的评分都是0-10分)。模型包括治疗组术语、心理特征术语(用于测试结果预测)和治疗组与心理特征之间的相互作用术语(用于测试治疗效果修改)。为了帮助解释效应修正的程度,我们计算了假定效应修正者的基线评分每增加1个标准差的结果变化。假设的疗效调节剂每改变1个标准差,感兴趣的结果变化>/=1.5点即被认为具有临床重要意义。结果:除应对外,所有心理特征均可预测预后,但均不是治疗效果的重要调节因素。56项治疗修改试验中只有5项具有统计学意义,相互作用的95%置信区间(95% ci)均未包括临床重要效应。例如,在52周时,焦虑基线水平提高1个标准差,运动对功能的额外影响为0.62 (95% CI 0.10, 1.15)。结论:我们测试的大多数心理特征预测了结果,但没有预测对物理治疗师指导的运动和/或建议的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthritis and rheumatism
Arthritis and rheumatism 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信