[Atypical antipsychotic efficacy and safety in managing delirium: a systematic review and critical analysis].

Camille Pelland, Jean-François Trudel
{"title":"[Atypical antipsychotic efficacy and safety in managing delirium: a systematic review and critical analysis].","authors":"Camille Pelland,&nbsp;Jean-François Trudel","doi":"10.1684/pnv.2009.0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delirium is a common syndrome in hospitalised patients, particularly in the elderly. While haloperidol has long been the preferred treatment, atypical antipsychotics are now often used, even though their efficacy and safety remain unclear. The review was intended to identify published studies on use of olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole in managing delirium; to assess their methodological quality; and to formulate clinical recommendations. From Medline and Embase databases (1996-2008), we included all retrospective and prospective group studies that made use of standardised symptom rating scales. We classified studies according to research design quality and extracted information on efficacy and safety. Overall, we found methodological quality to be low-to-moderate although it does seem to be improving. While two randomised olanzapine trials and one risperidone trial found these molecules to be as effective as haloperidol, results are contaminated by various biases. The only available randomised quetiapine trial used amisulpride as the control. These agents appear reasonably safe and induce fewer extrapyramidal side effects than haloperidol does. Occasional hypotension has been reported with risperidone and quetiapine, and occasional worsening of delirium with olanzapine. Data are scarce on their potential for relieving acute agitation in delirium. Haloperidol remains a time-tested treatment, particularly in critical care; safe, it is available in oral, IM and IV forms. Newer agents may be preferable when looking to avoid neurological side effects. Data on ziprasidone and aripiprazole are sparse; these molecules most likely are unsafe given their arrhythmia-inducing potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":54537,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie & Neuropsychiatrie Du Vieillissement","volume":"7 2","pages":"109-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1684/pnv.2009.0165","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie & Neuropsychiatrie Du Vieillissement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2009.0165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Delirium is a common syndrome in hospitalised patients, particularly in the elderly. While haloperidol has long been the preferred treatment, atypical antipsychotics are now often used, even though their efficacy and safety remain unclear. The review was intended to identify published studies on use of olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole in managing delirium; to assess their methodological quality; and to formulate clinical recommendations. From Medline and Embase databases (1996-2008), we included all retrospective and prospective group studies that made use of standardised symptom rating scales. We classified studies according to research design quality and extracted information on efficacy and safety. Overall, we found methodological quality to be low-to-moderate although it does seem to be improving. While two randomised olanzapine trials and one risperidone trial found these molecules to be as effective as haloperidol, results are contaminated by various biases. The only available randomised quetiapine trial used amisulpride as the control. These agents appear reasonably safe and induce fewer extrapyramidal side effects than haloperidol does. Occasional hypotension has been reported with risperidone and quetiapine, and occasional worsening of delirium with olanzapine. Data are scarce on their potential for relieving acute agitation in delirium. Haloperidol remains a time-tested treatment, particularly in critical care; safe, it is available in oral, IM and IV forms. Newer agents may be preferable when looking to avoid neurological side effects. Data on ziprasidone and aripiprazole are sparse; these molecules most likely are unsafe given their arrhythmia-inducing potential.

[非典型抗精神病药物治疗谵妄的疗效和安全性:系统回顾和批判性分析]。
谵妄是住院病人的常见症状,尤其是老年人。虽然氟哌啶醇长期以来一直是首选的治疗方法,但现在经常使用非典型抗精神病药物,尽管它们的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。本综述旨在确定已发表的有关使用奥氮平、利培酮、喹硫平、齐拉西酮和阿立哌唑治疗谵妄的研究;评估研究方法的质量;并制定临床建议。从Medline和Embase数据库(1996-2008)中,我们纳入了所有使用标准化症状评定量表的回顾性和前瞻性组研究。我们根据研究设计质量对研究进行分类,并提取有关疗效和安全性的信息。总的来说,我们发现方法质量是低到中等,尽管它似乎正在改善。虽然两项随机奥氮平试验和一项利培酮试验发现这些分子与氟哌啶醇一样有效,但结果受到各种偏差的影响。唯一可用的随机喹硫平试验使用氨硫pride作为对照。这些药物似乎相当安全,并且比氟哌啶醇引起的锥体外系副作用更少。利培酮和喹硫平偶有低血压的报道,奥氮平偶有谵妄的恶化。关于它们缓解谵妄急性躁动的潜力的资料很少。氟哌啶醇仍然是一种久经考验的治疗方法,特别是在重症监护中;它是安全的,有口服、注射和静脉注射形式。在寻求避免神经系统副作用时,较新的药物可能更可取。关于齐拉西酮和阿立哌唑的数据很少;考虑到它们诱发心律失常的潜力,这些分子很可能是不安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信