Improved influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in rheumatology patients taking immunosuppressants using an electronic health record best practice alert.

Lindsay J Ledwich, Thomas M Harrington, William T Ayoub, Jennifer A Sartorius, Eric D Newman
{"title":"Improved influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in rheumatology patients taking immunosuppressants using an electronic health record best practice alert.","authors":"Lindsay J Ledwich,&nbsp;Thomas M Harrington,&nbsp;William T Ayoub,&nbsp;Jennifer A Sartorius,&nbsp;Eric D Newman","doi":"10.1002/art.24873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether an electronic health record (EHR) best practice alert (BPA), a clinical reminder to help guideline adherence, improved vaccination rates in rheumatology patients receiving immunosuppressants. Guidelines recommend yearly influenza and pneumococcal vaccination with revaccination for patients age >65 years who are taking immunosuppressive medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A vaccination BPA was developed based on immunosuppressant treatment, age, and prior vaccinations. At site 1, a hospital-based academic practice, physicians ordered vaccinations. At site 2, a community-based practice, physicians signed orders placed by nurses. Demographics, vaccination rates, and documentation (vaccination or no administration) were obtained. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test analysis compared vaccination and documentation rates for October 1 through December 31, 2006 (preBPA), and October 1 through December 31, 2007 (postBPA). Breslow-Day statistics tested the odds ratio of improvement across the years between the sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PostBPA influenza vaccination rates significantly increased (47% to 65%; P < 0.001), with significant improvement at both sites. PostBPA pneumococcal vaccination rates likewise significantly increased (19% to 41%; P < 0.001). PostBPA documentation rates for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations also increased significantly. Site 2 (nurse-driven) had significantly higher preBPA vaccination rates for influenza (69% versus 43%; P < 0.001) than pneumococcal (47% versus 15%; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a BPA significantly increased influenza and pneumococcal vaccination and documentation rates in rheumatology patients taking immunosuppressants. A nurse-driven process offered higher efficacy. An EHR programmed to alert providers is an effective tool for improving quality of care for patients receiving immunosuppressants.</p>","PeriodicalId":8405,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"61 11","pages":"1505-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/art.24873","citationCount":"86","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 86

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether an electronic health record (EHR) best practice alert (BPA), a clinical reminder to help guideline adherence, improved vaccination rates in rheumatology patients receiving immunosuppressants. Guidelines recommend yearly influenza and pneumococcal vaccination with revaccination for patients age >65 years who are taking immunosuppressive medications.

Methods: A vaccination BPA was developed based on immunosuppressant treatment, age, and prior vaccinations. At site 1, a hospital-based academic practice, physicians ordered vaccinations. At site 2, a community-based practice, physicians signed orders placed by nurses. Demographics, vaccination rates, and documentation (vaccination or no administration) were obtained. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test analysis compared vaccination and documentation rates for October 1 through December 31, 2006 (preBPA), and October 1 through December 31, 2007 (postBPA). Breslow-Day statistics tested the odds ratio of improvement across the years between the sites.

Results: PostBPA influenza vaccination rates significantly increased (47% to 65%; P < 0.001), with significant improvement at both sites. PostBPA pneumococcal vaccination rates likewise significantly increased (19% to 41%; P < 0.001). PostBPA documentation rates for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations also increased significantly. Site 2 (nurse-driven) had significantly higher preBPA vaccination rates for influenza (69% versus 43%; P < 0.001) than pneumococcal (47% versus 15%; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The use of a BPA significantly increased influenza and pneumococcal vaccination and documentation rates in rheumatology patients taking immunosuppressants. A nurse-driven process offered higher efficacy. An EHR programmed to alert providers is an effective tool for improving quality of care for patients receiving immunosuppressants.

使用电子健康记录最佳实践警报改善风湿病患者使用免疫抑制剂的流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种。
目的:研究电子健康记录(EHR)最佳实践警报(BPA)是否能提高风湿病患者接受免疫抑制剂的疫苗接种率。指南建议年龄>65岁且正在服用免疫抑制药物的患者每年接种一次流感和肺炎球菌疫苗并再次接种。方法:根据免疫抑制剂治疗、年龄和既往疫苗接种情况制定疫苗接种BPA。在现场1,一个以医院为基础的学术实践,医生要求接种疫苗。在2号地点,一个以社区为基础的诊所,医生签署护士下达的命令。获得了人口统计数据、疫苗接种率和文件(接种或未接种)。卡方和Fisher的精确检验分析比较了2006年10月1日至12月31日(bpa前)和2007年10月1日至12月31日(bpa后)的疫苗接种率和记录率。brreslow - day统计数据测试了不同地点在不同年份改善的优势比。结果:bpa后流感疫苗接种率显著提高(47% ~ 65%;P < 0.001),两处均有显著改善。双酚a后肺炎球菌疫苗接种率同样显著增加(19%至41%;P < 0.001)。bpa后流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种的记录率也显著增加。2号站点(护士驱动)的bpa前流感疫苗接种率显著较高(69%对43%;P < 0.001)比肺炎球菌(47%对15%;P < 0.001)。结论:双酚a的使用显著提高了使用免疫抑制剂的风湿病患者的流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种率和记录率。以护士为主导的过程具有更高的疗效。电子病历程序提醒提供者是提高接受免疫抑制剂患者护理质量的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthritis and rheumatism
Arthritis and rheumatism 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信