Genital herpes education and counselling: testing a one-page 'FAQ' intervention.

Herpes : the journal of the IHMF Pub Date : 2009-01-01
Lisa K Gilbert, Fred Wyand
{"title":"Genital herpes education and counselling: testing a one-page 'FAQ' intervention.","authors":"Lisa K Gilbert,&nbsp;Fred Wyand","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately 17% of adults in the USA have antibodies to herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), 85-90% of whom are unaware of their infection. Diagnosed patients are more likely to detect HSV reactivation, disclose infection status to partner(s) and employ risk-reduction strategies; therefore, diagnosing more cases may reduce herpes transmission rates. Providers are reluctant to identify genital herpes because of potentially lengthy counselling visits or discomfort in dealing with patients' emotional reactions. This study tested the efficacy of a one-page frequently-asked-questions (FAQ) sheet regarding length of initial diagnostic visit, patient satisfaction with topics covered, provider's coverage of topics and resources/referrals provided to patients. Data from 147 patients and 26 providers were analysed. When pre- and post-FAQ sheet data were compared, diagnostic visit time was not substantially reduced but there were favourable trends in patient satisfaction levels on some topics, and providers covered more topics and offered more resources. This FAQ was useful in simplifying topics, providing prompts for providers and resources for patients. While this FAQ sheet appears favourable in this exploratory study, more investigation is needed to measure the degree to which patients use and understand the FAQ sheet, and find it to be a helpful tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":83725,"journal":{"name":"Herpes : the journal of the IHMF","volume":"15 3","pages":"51-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herpes : the journal of the IHMF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 17% of adults in the USA have antibodies to herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), 85-90% of whom are unaware of their infection. Diagnosed patients are more likely to detect HSV reactivation, disclose infection status to partner(s) and employ risk-reduction strategies; therefore, diagnosing more cases may reduce herpes transmission rates. Providers are reluctant to identify genital herpes because of potentially lengthy counselling visits or discomfort in dealing with patients' emotional reactions. This study tested the efficacy of a one-page frequently-asked-questions (FAQ) sheet regarding length of initial diagnostic visit, patient satisfaction with topics covered, provider's coverage of topics and resources/referrals provided to patients. Data from 147 patients and 26 providers were analysed. When pre- and post-FAQ sheet data were compared, diagnostic visit time was not substantially reduced but there were favourable trends in patient satisfaction levels on some topics, and providers covered more topics and offered more resources. This FAQ was useful in simplifying topics, providing prompts for providers and resources for patients. While this FAQ sheet appears favourable in this exploratory study, more investigation is needed to measure the degree to which patients use and understand the FAQ sheet, and find it to be a helpful tool.

生殖器疱疹教育和咨询:测试一页的“常见问题”干预。
在美国,大约17%的成年人有2型单纯疱疹病毒(HSV-2)抗体,其中85-90%的人不知道自己感染了。确诊的患者更有可能发现HSV再激活,向伴侣披露感染状况并采取降低风险的策略;因此,诊断更多的病例可能会降低疱疹传播率。提供者不愿意确认生殖器疱疹,因为可能需要很长时间的咨询,或者在处理病人的情绪反应时感到不舒服。本研究测试了一页的常见问题(FAQ)表的有效性,包括首次诊断访问的长度,患者对所涵盖主题的满意度,提供者对主题的覆盖范围以及提供给患者的资源/转介。分析了147名患者和26名提供者的数据。当比较常见问题表之前和之后的数据时,诊断访问时间并没有大幅减少,但在某些主题上患者满意度水平有良好的趋势,提供者涵盖了更多的主题并提供了更多的资源。这个常见问题解答有助于简化主题,为提供者提供提示,为患者提供资源。虽然这个常见问题表在这个探索性研究中似乎是有利的,但需要更多的调查来衡量患者使用和理解常见问题表的程度,并发现它是一个有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信