Endothelial progenitor cells in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease.

Pietro Delva, Sergio De Marchi, Manlio Prior, Maurizio Degan, Alessandro Lechi, Maristella Trettene, Enrico Arosio
{"title":"Endothelial progenitor cells in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease.","authors":"Pietro Delva,&nbsp;Sergio De Marchi,&nbsp;Manlio Prior,&nbsp;Maurizio Degan,&nbsp;Alessandro Lechi,&nbsp;Maristella Trettene,&nbsp;Enrico Arosio","doi":"10.1080/10623320802487718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aims of this study were to investigate the interrelationships between endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and atherosclerotic risk factors, as only limited data are available regarding the EPCs in patients with PAD. The authors studied the number of EPCs by different methods in a carefully selected group of 45 patients with PAD along with 24 healthy subjects (HS). In patients with PAD, by utilizing the dual-binding method, the number of EPCs was significantly increased compared to HS (M +/- SD, PAD: 73 +/- 33, HS: 52 +/- 20 EPCs/high power field; p < .001). On the contrary, both CD34(+) cell count and CD133(+) cell count were significantly decreased compared to HS. Colony-forming units were significantly increased in PAD compared to HS (median and 25th and 75th percentiles, PAD: 7, 1, 9; HS: 1, 1, 4 CFU/well, respectively; Mann-Whitney, p = .006). In patients with PAD, the number and proliferative activity of circulating EPCs are increased with respect to HS even though EPC count by flourecence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis provided different results and this may explain the discrepancy in data collected using different methods. The regulation of the number and biological activity of EPCs in PAD remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":11587,"journal":{"name":"Endothelium : journal of endothelial cell research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10623320802487718","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endothelium : journal of endothelial cell research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10623320802487718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the interrelationships between endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and atherosclerotic risk factors, as only limited data are available regarding the EPCs in patients with PAD. The authors studied the number of EPCs by different methods in a carefully selected group of 45 patients with PAD along with 24 healthy subjects (HS). In patients with PAD, by utilizing the dual-binding method, the number of EPCs was significantly increased compared to HS (M +/- SD, PAD: 73 +/- 33, HS: 52 +/- 20 EPCs/high power field; p < .001). On the contrary, both CD34(+) cell count and CD133(+) cell count were significantly decreased compared to HS. Colony-forming units were significantly increased in PAD compared to HS (median and 25th and 75th percentiles, PAD: 7, 1, 9; HS: 1, 1, 4 CFU/well, respectively; Mann-Whitney, p = .006). In patients with PAD, the number and proliferative activity of circulating EPCs are increased with respect to HS even though EPC count by flourecence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis provided different results and this may explain the discrepancy in data collected using different methods. The regulation of the number and biological activity of EPCs in PAD remains unclear.

内皮祖细胞在严重外周动脉疾病患者中的应用
本研究的目的是研究内皮祖细胞(EPCs)、外周动脉疾病(PAD)和动脉粥样硬化危险因素之间的相互关系,因为只有有限的数据可用于PAD患者的EPCs。作者在精心挑选的45名PAD患者和24名健康受试者(HS)中通过不同方法研究了EPCs的数量。在PAD患者中,采用双结合方法,EPCs数量较HS显著增加(M +/- SD, PAD: 73 +/- 33, HS: 52 +/- 20 EPCs/高倍场;P < 0.001)。与HS相比,CD34(+)细胞计数和CD133(+)细胞计数均明显减少。与HS相比,PAD的菌落形成单位显著增加(中位数、25和75百分位数,PAD: 7、1、9;HS:分别为1,1,4 CFU/井;Mann-Whitney, p = .006)。在PAD患者中,尽管荧光活化细胞分选(FACS)分析的EPC计数提供了不同的结果,但循环EPCs的数量和增殖活性相对于HS有所增加,这可能解释了使用不同方法收集数据的差异。EPCs在PAD中数量和生物活性的调控尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信