Association Between Sleep Disordered Breathing and Behavior in School-Aged Children: The Tucson Children's Assessment of Sleep Apnea Study.

Qiuhong Zhao, Duane L Sherrill, James L Goodwin, Stuart F Quan
{"title":"Association Between Sleep Disordered Breathing and Behavior in School-Aged Children: The Tucson Children's Assessment of Sleep Apnea Study.","authors":"Qiuhong Zhao,&nbsp;Duane L Sherrill,&nbsp;James L Goodwin,&nbsp;Stuart F Quan","doi":"10.2174/1874297100801010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the association between the Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) and two behavior measures, the Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in school-aged children to determine whether there is an optimal threshold of Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) associated with increased risk of behavior problems. METHODS: The Tucson Children's Assessment of Sleep Apnea Study (TuCASA) is an observational cohort study of 6-11 year old Caucasian and Hispanic children designed to assess the anatomic, physiologic and neurocognitive correlates of SDB. 403 children with both polysomnography (PSG) and behavioral data were included in this analysis. Three definitions of SDB were used: RDI independent of oxygen desaturation (RDI0), RDI with 2% oxygen desaturation (RDI2) and RDI with 3% oxygen desaturation (RDI3). T-scored behavioral data were dichotomized at a cutoff point of 65, a score indicative of moderate to severe clinical impairment. Logistic regression was used to access the risk associated with SDB. RESULTS: The analyses conducted using three different definitions of RDI suggest that the likelihood of having a clinically significant CPRS-R or CBCL subscale score was not necessarily progressive or linear across RDI categories. Cutoff points and prevalences for each definition of RDI proposed to be indicators of clinically significant SDB were RDI0 ≥ 7 (19.38%), RDI2 ≥ 2 (29.38%) and RDI3 ≥ 0.5 (23.96%) events per hour of sleep. Behaviors such as CPRS oppositional, social problems, psychosomatic and CBCL somatic complaints, social problems and aggressive behaviors were found to be significantly associated with SDB. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis found an increased risk of behavior problems such as somatic complaints, oppositional or aggressive behaviors and social problems associated with sleep-disordered breathing in school-aged children. RDI cut points for three definitions of SDB are proposed: 7 for RDI0, 2 for RDI2, and 0.5 for RDI3 respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":87834,"journal":{"name":"The open epidemiology journal","volume":"1 ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2435049/pdf/nihms39358.pdf","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open epidemiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874297100801010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the association between the Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) and two behavior measures, the Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in school-aged children to determine whether there is an optimal threshold of Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) associated with increased risk of behavior problems. METHODS: The Tucson Children's Assessment of Sleep Apnea Study (TuCASA) is an observational cohort study of 6-11 year old Caucasian and Hispanic children designed to assess the anatomic, physiologic and neurocognitive correlates of SDB. 403 children with both polysomnography (PSG) and behavioral data were included in this analysis. Three definitions of SDB were used: RDI independent of oxygen desaturation (RDI0), RDI with 2% oxygen desaturation (RDI2) and RDI with 3% oxygen desaturation (RDI3). T-scored behavioral data were dichotomized at a cutoff point of 65, a score indicative of moderate to severe clinical impairment. Logistic regression was used to access the risk associated with SDB. RESULTS: The analyses conducted using three different definitions of RDI suggest that the likelihood of having a clinically significant CPRS-R or CBCL subscale score was not necessarily progressive or linear across RDI categories. Cutoff points and prevalences for each definition of RDI proposed to be indicators of clinically significant SDB were RDI0 ≥ 7 (19.38%), RDI2 ≥ 2 (29.38%) and RDI3 ≥ 0.5 (23.96%) events per hour of sleep. Behaviors such as CPRS oppositional, social problems, psychosomatic and CBCL somatic complaints, social problems and aggressive behaviors were found to be significantly associated with SDB. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis found an increased risk of behavior problems such as somatic complaints, oppositional or aggressive behaviors and social problems associated with sleep-disordered breathing in school-aged children. RDI cut points for three definitions of SDB are proposed: 7 for RDI0, 2 for RDI2, and 0.5 for RDI3 respectively.

学龄儿童睡眠呼吸障碍与行为的关系:图森儿童睡眠呼吸暂停评估研究。
研究目的:本研究分析学龄儿童呼吸障碍指数(RDI)与Conners父母评定量表(CPRS-R)和儿童行为检查表(CBCL)两项行为测量的相关性,以确定睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)是否存在与行为问题风险增加相关的最佳阈值。方法:图森儿童睡眠呼吸暂停评估研究(TuCASA)是一项针对6-11岁高加索和西班牙裔儿童的观察性队列研究,旨在评估SDB的解剖、生理和神经认知相关因素。403名同时具有多导睡眠图(PSG)和行为数据的儿童纳入本分析。SDB有三种定义:不含氧去饱和的RDI (RDI0)、含2%氧去饱和的RDI (RDI2)和含3%氧去饱和的RDI (RDI3)。t评分的行为数据在截断点65分进行二分,该分数表明中度至重度临床损害。采用Logistic回归分析与SDB相关的风险。结果:使用三种不同的RDI定义进行的分析表明,在RDI类别中,具有临床意义的CPRS-R或CBCL亚量表评分的可能性不一定是渐进的或线性的。每小时睡眠RDI0≥7次(19.38%)、RDI2≥2次(29.38%)和RDI3≥0.5次(23.96%)是临床显著性SDB指标的截止点和患病率。CPRS反对、社会问题、心身和CBCL躯体抱怨、社会问题和攻击行为等行为与SDB有显著相关。结论:该分析发现,学龄儿童与睡眠呼吸障碍相关的行为问题,如躯体抱怨、对立或攻击行为和社会问题的风险增加。提出了三种SDB定义的RDI切点:RDI0为7,RDI2为2,RDI3为0.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信