Research-practice partners assess their first joint project.

Suzanne L Wenzel, Patricia Ebener, Sarah B Hunter, Katherine E Watkins, James M Gilmore
{"title":"Research-practice partners assess their first joint project.","authors":"Suzanne L Wenzel,&nbsp;Patricia Ebener,&nbsp;Sarah B Hunter,&nbsp;Katherine E Watkins,&nbsp;James M Gilmore","doi":"10.1151/spp053138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Investigators from RAND Corporation and community treatment providers at Behavioral Health Services joined forces to test an intervention to improve services for patients with co-occurring mental disorders. In the course of working together, the partners confronted many of the issues that typify research-practice collaborations in community settings. The researchers' applied theoretical understanding and the counselors' intimacy with patient responses combined to strengthen the intervention. However, counselors' discomfort with some protocols and changes reflecting the extremely dynamic nature of the community-based research setting complicated the study execution and interpretation. Despite these challenges, the intervention improved the counselors' ability to identify and respond appropriately to patients' co-occurring disorders, and one of its components was associated with improved patient outcomes. The experience also demonstrated the advisability of consulting collaboratively with clinic staff during the planning of studies and the pretesting of study protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":87483,"journal":{"name":"Science & practice perspectives","volume":"3 1","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2851038/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & practice perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1151/spp053138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Investigators from RAND Corporation and community treatment providers at Behavioral Health Services joined forces to test an intervention to improve services for patients with co-occurring mental disorders. In the course of working together, the partners confronted many of the issues that typify research-practice collaborations in community settings. The researchers' applied theoretical understanding and the counselors' intimacy with patient responses combined to strengthen the intervention. However, counselors' discomfort with some protocols and changes reflecting the extremely dynamic nature of the community-based research setting complicated the study execution and interpretation. Despite these challenges, the intervention improved the counselors' ability to identify and respond appropriately to patients' co-occurring disorders, and one of its components was associated with improved patient outcomes. The experience also demonstrated the advisability of consulting collaboratively with clinic staff during the planning of studies and the pretesting of study protocols.

研究实践合作伙伴评估他们的第一个联合项目。
兰德公司的调查人员和行为健康服务的社区治疗提供者联手测试了一种干预措施,以改善对同时出现精神障碍的患者的服务。在合作的过程中,合作伙伴们遇到了许多典型的社区研究实践合作的问题。研究人员的应用理论理解和咨询师对患者反应的亲近感相结合,加强了干预。然而,辅导员对一些协议和变化的不适反映了社区研究环境的极端动态性质,使研究的执行和解释复杂化。尽管存在这些挑战,干预提高了辅导员识别和适当应对患者共同发生的疾病的能力,其组成部分之一与改善患者预后有关。经验还表明,在研究计划和研究方案的预测试期间,与临床工作人员合作咨询是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书