Do we need routine complete blood count following vaginal delivery?

Shir Dar, Ilana Shoham Vardi, Gershon Holcberg, Haim Reuveni, Ronit Yerushalmi, Miriam Katz, Eyal Sheiner
{"title":"Do we need routine complete blood count following vaginal delivery?","authors":"Shir Dar,&nbsp;Ilana Shoham Vardi,&nbsp;Gershon Holcberg,&nbsp;Haim Reuveni,&nbsp;Ronit Yerushalmi,&nbsp;Miriam Katz,&nbsp;Eyal Sheiner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Routine post partum complete blood count examination (CBC) is customary in many medical centers. The rationale behind drawing a routine CBC is to estimate blood loss during delivery and to identify patients who will need blood transfusions. The present study was aimed to determine the necessity of routine post-partum CBC following vaginal delivery. A retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients who received blood transfusions following vaginal delivery between January 2003 and November 2004. Data were collected from birth files. The indications for administration of blood transfusions were noted. Of 20,694 vaginal deliveries, 0.7% (n = 138) received blood transfusions. All patients had at least one obstetric risk factor of postpartum hemorrhage or symptomatic anemia. None received the blood transfusion based upon postpartum CBC hemoglobin level alone. Routine postpartum CBC is not warranted for the purpose of identifying the patient in need of blood transfusions. Postpartum CBC should be performed when indicated according to risk factors for excessive blood loss or patients' complaints.</p>","PeriodicalId":50324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility and Womens Medicine","volume":"51 6","pages":"270-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility and Womens Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Routine post partum complete blood count examination (CBC) is customary in many medical centers. The rationale behind drawing a routine CBC is to estimate blood loss during delivery and to identify patients who will need blood transfusions. The present study was aimed to determine the necessity of routine post-partum CBC following vaginal delivery. A retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients who received blood transfusions following vaginal delivery between January 2003 and November 2004. Data were collected from birth files. The indications for administration of blood transfusions were noted. Of 20,694 vaginal deliveries, 0.7% (n = 138) received blood transfusions. All patients had at least one obstetric risk factor of postpartum hemorrhage or symptomatic anemia. None received the blood transfusion based upon postpartum CBC hemoglobin level alone. Routine postpartum CBC is not warranted for the purpose of identifying the patient in need of blood transfusions. Postpartum CBC should be performed when indicated according to risk factors for excessive blood loss or patients' complaints.

阴道分娩后需要常规全血细胞计数吗?
常规产后全血细胞计数检查(CBC)是许多医疗中心的惯例。常规全血细胞计数的基本原理是估计分娩过程中的出血量,并确定需要输血的患者。本研究旨在确定阴道分娩后常规产后全血细胞计数的必要性。回顾性队列研究包括2003年1月至2004年11月期间阴道分娩后接受输血的所有患者。数据从出生档案中收集。注意输血的适应症。在20,694例阴道分娩中,0.7% (n = 138)接受输血。所有患者至少有一个产后出血或症状性贫血的产科危险因素。没有人接受输血仅根据产后CBC血红蛋白水平。常规产后全血细胞计数不能确定是否需要输血。产后全血细胞计数应根据失血过多或患者主诉的危险因素进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信