Inheritance Analysis of Herbicide-Resistant Transgenic Soybean Lines

ZHANG Yong, YANG Bao-Yu, CHEN Shi-Yun
{"title":"Inheritance Analysis of Herbicide-Resistant Transgenic Soybean Lines","authors":"ZHANG Yong,&nbsp;YANG Bao-Yu,&nbsp;CHEN Shi-Yun","doi":"10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60148-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Four transgenic soybean lines generated <em>via Agrobacterium</em>-mediated transformation were used to analyze inheritance of the transgenes. Seed chip GUS assay and herbicide leaf painting and spraying assays were applied to test the gus reporter gene and the herbicide resistant <em>bar</em> selectable marker gene, respectively. Three of the four transgenic soybean lines were stably inherited in a Mendelian fashion with co-segregation of both transgenes in a 3:1 segregation ratio in the T<sub>1</sub> progeny, indicating that both transgenes were integrated into the same locus of the soybean genome. Homozygous transgenic progeny plants were obtained in the T<sub>2</sub> generation of these lines, and the transgenes were inherited in five successive generations. However, in one transgenic line, all the T<sub>1</sub> progeny plants showed GUS negative and herbicide sensitive. Southern blotting analysis confirmed that the transgenes were passed into the T<sub>1</sub> progeny, indicating that the transgenes were both silenced. To test if the transgene silencing was due to transcriptional or post-transcriptional level, <em>Soybean mosaic virus</em> (SMV) was inoculated on leaf tissues of the T<sub>1</sub> plants to test possible reverse effects on transgene silencing. Infection with SMV did not suppress transgene silencing, suggesting that transgene silencing in this transgenic line may not be due to post-transcriptional gene silencing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100017,"journal":{"name":"Acta Genetica Sinica","volume":"33 12","pages":"Pages 1105-1111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60148-0","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Genetica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379417206601480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Four transgenic soybean lines generated via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were used to analyze inheritance of the transgenes. Seed chip GUS assay and herbicide leaf painting and spraying assays were applied to test the gus reporter gene and the herbicide resistant bar selectable marker gene, respectively. Three of the four transgenic soybean lines were stably inherited in a Mendelian fashion with co-segregation of both transgenes in a 3:1 segregation ratio in the T1 progeny, indicating that both transgenes were integrated into the same locus of the soybean genome. Homozygous transgenic progeny plants were obtained in the T2 generation of these lines, and the transgenes were inherited in five successive generations. However, in one transgenic line, all the T1 progeny plants showed GUS negative and herbicide sensitive. Southern blotting analysis confirmed that the transgenes were passed into the T1 progeny, indicating that the transgenes were both silenced. To test if the transgene silencing was due to transcriptional or post-transcriptional level, Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) was inoculated on leaf tissues of the T1 plants to test possible reverse effects on transgene silencing. Infection with SMV did not suppress transgene silencing, suggesting that transgene silencing in this transgenic line may not be due to post-transcriptional gene silencing.

转基因大豆抗除草剂品系的遗传分析
利用农杆菌介导转化获得的4个转基因大豆品系进行了基因遗传分析。采用种子片GUS法和除草剂叶片涂布喷雾法分别检测GUS报告基因和抗除草剂棒选择标记基因。4个转基因大豆品系中有3个在T1代中以孟德尔模式稳定遗传,两种转基因基因以3:1的分离比例共分离,表明两种转基因基因被整合到大豆基因组的同一位点上。这些系在T2代获得了纯合的转基因后代植株,转基因基因在5代连续遗传。而在同一转基因品系中,所有T1代植株均为GUS阴性,且对除草剂敏感。Southern blotting分析证实,转基因被传递到T1后代中,表明转基因都被沉默了。为了验证转基因沉默是由于转录水平还是转录后水平,我们将大豆花叶病毒(SMV)接种在T1植株的叶片组织上,以测试对转基因沉默可能产生的逆转作用。SMV感染不抑制转基因沉默,提示该转基因品系的转基因沉默可能不是由于转录后基因沉默。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信