Improving QTL Mapping Resolution Based on Genotypic Sampling—a Case Using a RIL Population

YAN Jian-Bing, TANG Ji-Hua, MENG Yi-Jiang, MA Xi-Qing, TENG Wen-Tao, Subhash Chander, LI Lin, LI Jian-Sheng
{"title":"Improving QTL Mapping Resolution Based on Genotypic Sampling—a Case Using a RIL Population","authors":"YAN Jian-Bing,&nbsp;TANG Ji-Hua,&nbsp;MENG Yi-Jiang,&nbsp;MA Xi-Qing,&nbsp;TENG Wen-Tao,&nbsp;Subhash Chander,&nbsp;LI Lin,&nbsp;LI Jian-Sheng","doi":"10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60091-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The QTL mapping results were compared with the genotypically selected and random samples of the same size on the base of a RIL population. The results demonstrated that there were no obvious differences in the trait distribution and marker segregation distortion between the genotypically selected and random samples with the same population size. However, a significant increase in QTL detection power, sensitivity, specificity, and QTL resolution in the genotypically selected samples were observed. Moreover, the highly significant effect was detected in small size of genotypically selected samples. In QTL mapping, phenotyping is a more sensitive limiting factor than genotyping so that the selection of samples could be an attractive strategy for increasing genome-wide QTL mapping resolution. The efficient selection of samples should be more helpful for QTL maker assistant selection, fine mapping, and QTL cloning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100017,"journal":{"name":"Acta Genetica Sinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60091-7","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Genetica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379417206600917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The QTL mapping results were compared with the genotypically selected and random samples of the same size on the base of a RIL population. The results demonstrated that there were no obvious differences in the trait distribution and marker segregation distortion between the genotypically selected and random samples with the same population size. However, a significant increase in QTL detection power, sensitivity, specificity, and QTL resolution in the genotypically selected samples were observed. Moreover, the highly significant effect was detected in small size of genotypically selected samples. In QTL mapping, phenotyping is a more sensitive limiting factor than genotyping so that the selection of samples could be an attractive strategy for increasing genome-wide QTL mapping resolution. The efficient selection of samples should be more helpful for QTL maker assistant selection, fine mapping, and QTL cloning.

基于基因型抽样提高QTL定位分辨率——以RIL群体为例
将QTL定位结果与RIL群体中相同大小的基因典型选择和随机样本进行比较。结果表明,在相同群体规模的情况下,基因型选择和随机样本在性状分布和标记分离畸变方面无明显差异。然而,在基因典型选择的样本中,QTL检测能力、灵敏度、特异性和QTL分辨率显著增加。此外,在小样本的基因典型选择中检测到高度显著的效应。在QTL定位中,表型是一个比基因分型更敏感的限制因素,因此样品的选择可能是提高全基因组QTL定位分辨率的一种有吸引力的策略。高效的样本选择有助于QTL maker辅助选择、精细定位和QTL克隆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信