YAN Jian-Bing, TANG Ji-Hua, MENG Yi-Jiang, MA Xi-Qing, TENG Wen-Tao, Subhash Chander, LI Lin, LI Jian-Sheng
{"title":"Improving QTL Mapping Resolution Based on Genotypic Sampling—a Case Using a RIL Population","authors":"YAN Jian-Bing, TANG Ji-Hua, MENG Yi-Jiang, MA Xi-Qing, TENG Wen-Tao, Subhash Chander, LI Lin, LI Jian-Sheng","doi":"10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60091-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The QTL mapping results were compared with the genotypically selected and random samples of the same size on the base of a RIL population. The results demonstrated that there were no obvious differences in the trait distribution and marker segregation distortion between the genotypically selected and random samples with the same population size. However, a significant increase in QTL detection power, sensitivity, specificity, and QTL resolution in the genotypically selected samples were observed. Moreover, the highly significant effect was detected in small size of genotypically selected samples. In QTL mapping, phenotyping is a more sensitive limiting factor than genotyping so that the selection of samples could be an attractive strategy for increasing genome-wide QTL mapping resolution. The efficient selection of samples should be more helpful for QTL maker assistant selection, fine mapping, and QTL cloning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100017,"journal":{"name":"Acta Genetica Sinica","volume":"33 7","pages":"Pages 617-624"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60091-7","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Genetica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379417206600917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
The QTL mapping results were compared with the genotypically selected and random samples of the same size on the base of a RIL population. The results demonstrated that there were no obvious differences in the trait distribution and marker segregation distortion between the genotypically selected and random samples with the same population size. However, a significant increase in QTL detection power, sensitivity, specificity, and QTL resolution in the genotypically selected samples were observed. Moreover, the highly significant effect was detected in small size of genotypically selected samples. In QTL mapping, phenotyping is a more sensitive limiting factor than genotyping so that the selection of samples could be an attractive strategy for increasing genome-wide QTL mapping resolution. The efficient selection of samples should be more helpful for QTL maker assistant selection, fine mapping, and QTL cloning.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
