Environmental and individual predictors of error in field estimates of blood alcohol concentration: a multilevel analysis.

John D Clapp, Jong W Min, Audrey M Shillington, Mark B Reed, James E Lange, Megan R Holmes
{"title":"Environmental and individual predictors of error in field estimates of blood alcohol concentration: a multilevel analysis.","authors":"John D Clapp,&nbsp;Jong W Min,&nbsp;Audrey M Shillington,&nbsp;Mark B Reed,&nbsp;James E Lange,&nbsp;Megan R Holmes","doi":"10.15288/jsa.2006.67.620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using self-report survey data and measures of breath alcohol concentration (BrAC), this study examined the validity of an estimate of blood alcohol concentration (eBAC). Differences between eBAC and BrAC were modeled to identify sources of error related to survey-derived eBAC. Further, using hierarchical multilevel analyses, environmental event characteristics were examined as sources of eBAC error.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>College students were interviewed and provided breath samples at randomly selected parties on Friday and Saturday nights. Interviews included items assessing the total number of drinks consumed, duration of drinking event, gender, and weight, which allowed for the calculation of eBAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, eBACs were inaccurate. Total number of drinks consumed was associated with underestimates of eBAC, whereas time drinking was associated with overestimates of eBAC. Environmental variables, including party size, rowdy behavior, having food present, and observing many intoxicated partygoers, were also associated with eBAC errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current self-report survey methodology to calculate eBAC may be insufficient to estimate BAC with any accuracy. Environmental factors associated with the last drinking event for which BAC is being estimated should be considered when calculating eBAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol","volume":"67 4","pages":"620-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.620","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Objective: Using self-report survey data and measures of breath alcohol concentration (BrAC), this study examined the validity of an estimate of blood alcohol concentration (eBAC). Differences between eBAC and BrAC were modeled to identify sources of error related to survey-derived eBAC. Further, using hierarchical multilevel analyses, environmental event characteristics were examined as sources of eBAC error.

Method: College students were interviewed and provided breath samples at randomly selected parties on Friday and Saturday nights. Interviews included items assessing the total number of drinks consumed, duration of drinking event, gender, and weight, which allowed for the calculation of eBAC.

Results: Overall, eBACs were inaccurate. Total number of drinks consumed was associated with underestimates of eBAC, whereas time drinking was associated with overestimates of eBAC. Environmental variables, including party size, rowdy behavior, having food present, and observing many intoxicated partygoers, were also associated with eBAC errors.

Conclusions: Current self-report survey methodology to calculate eBAC may be insufficient to estimate BAC with any accuracy. Environmental factors associated with the last drinking event for which BAC is being estimated should be considered when calculating eBAC.

血液酒精浓度现场估计值误差的环境和个体预测因素:多水平分析
目的:利用自我报告调查数据和呼吸酒精浓度(BrAC)测量,本研究检验了血液酒精浓度(eBAC)估计值的有效性。对eBAC和BrAC之间的差异进行建模,以确定与调查衍生的eBAC相关的误差来源。此外,使用分层多水平分析,环境事件特征作为eBAC误差的来源进行了检查。方法:随机选取周五、周六晚参加聚会的大学生进行访谈并提供呼气样本。访谈包括评估饮酒总量、饮酒持续时间、性别和体重的项目,以便计算eBAC。结果:总体而言,ebac是不准确的。总饮酒量与eBAC的低估有关,而饮酒时间与eBAC的高估有关。环境变量,包括聚会规模,吵闹的行为,有食物存在,以及观察许多醉酒的聚会者,也与eBAC错误有关。结论:目前计算eBAC的自我报告调查方法可能不足以准确估计BAC。计算eBAC时应考虑与上次饮酒事件相关的环境因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信