Correlates of rural methamphetamine and cocaine users: results from a multistate community study.

Brenda M Booth, Carl Leukefeld, Russel Falck, Jichuan Wang, Robert Carlson
{"title":"Correlates of rural methamphetamine and cocaine users: results from a multistate community study.","authors":"Brenda M Booth,&nbsp;Carl Leukefeld,&nbsp;Russel Falck,&nbsp;Jichuan Wang,&nbsp;Robert Carlson","doi":"10.15288/jsa.2006.67.493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Use and production of methamphetamine (MA) has dramatically increased in the United States, especially in rural areas, with concomitant burdens on the treatment and criminal justice systems. However, cocaine is also widely used in many rural areas. The purpose of this article is to contrast MA and cocaine users in three geographically distinct rural areas of the United States.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were recent not-in-treatment adult cocaine and MA users living in rural Ohio, Arkansas, and Kentucky, who were recruited by a referral recruitment method for sampling hidden community populations. Participants were interviewed for demographics, drug and alcohol use, criminal justice involvement, and psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample of 706 comprised 29% nonwhite and 38% female participants; the average age was 32.6 years; 58% had a high school education or higher, and 32% were employed. In the past 6 months, they had used either MA only (13%), cocaine only (52%), or both (35%). MA users were seldom (8.2%) nonwhite, but type of stimulant use did not vary by gender. Combined MA/cocaine users reported significantly greater use of alcohol and other drugs, including marijuana and nonprescribed opiates and tranquilizers, and reported significantly higher psychological distress. MA users (with or without cocaine use) had greater odds of recent criminal justice involvement compared with cocaine-only users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a clear need for accessible substance-use treatment and prevention services in rural areas of the United States, including services that can address MA, cocaine, polydrug use, and mental health needs. There is a particular need of these services for polydrug users.</p>","PeriodicalId":17092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol","volume":"67 4","pages":"493-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.493","citationCount":"102","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

Abstract

Objective: Use and production of methamphetamine (MA) has dramatically increased in the United States, especially in rural areas, with concomitant burdens on the treatment and criminal justice systems. However, cocaine is also widely used in many rural areas. The purpose of this article is to contrast MA and cocaine users in three geographically distinct rural areas of the United States.

Method: Participants were recent not-in-treatment adult cocaine and MA users living in rural Ohio, Arkansas, and Kentucky, who were recruited by a referral recruitment method for sampling hidden community populations. Participants were interviewed for demographics, drug and alcohol use, criminal justice involvement, and psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory).

Results: The sample of 706 comprised 29% nonwhite and 38% female participants; the average age was 32.6 years; 58% had a high school education or higher, and 32% were employed. In the past 6 months, they had used either MA only (13%), cocaine only (52%), or both (35%). MA users were seldom (8.2%) nonwhite, but type of stimulant use did not vary by gender. Combined MA/cocaine users reported significantly greater use of alcohol and other drugs, including marijuana and nonprescribed opiates and tranquilizers, and reported significantly higher psychological distress. MA users (with or without cocaine use) had greater odds of recent criminal justice involvement compared with cocaine-only users.

Conclusions: There is a clear need for accessible substance-use treatment and prevention services in rural areas of the United States, including services that can address MA, cocaine, polydrug use, and mental health needs. There is a particular need of these services for polydrug users.

农村甲基苯丙胺和可卡因使用者的相关性:一项多州社区研究的结果。
目的:在美国,特别是在农村地区,甲基苯丙胺的使用和生产急剧增加,给治疗和刑事司法系统带来了负担。然而,可卡因在许多农村地区也被广泛使用。本文的目的是对比美国三个地理位置不同的农村地区的MA和可卡因使用者。方法:参与者是居住在俄亥俄州,阿肯色州和肯塔基州农村地区的近期未接受治疗的成年可卡因和MA使用者,他们采用推荐招募方法对隐藏社区人口进行抽样。对参与者进行了人口统计、药物和酒精使用、刑事司法参与和心理困扰(简短症状清单)方面的访谈。结果:706人的样本包括29%的非白人和38%的女性参与者;平均年龄32.6岁;58%的人受过高中或更高的教育,32%的人有工作。在过去的6个月里,他们要么只使用MA(13%),要么只使用可卡因(52%),要么两者都使用(35%)。MA使用者很少是非白人(8.2%),但兴奋剂使用类型没有因性别而异。MA/可卡因联合使用者报告说,酒精和其他药物(包括大麻、非处方阿片类药物和镇静剂)的使用明显增加,心理困扰也明显增加。与纯可卡因使用者相比,MA使用者(有或没有使用可卡因)最近参与刑事司法的几率更大。结论:美国农村地区显然需要可获得的药物使用治疗和预防服务,包括能够解决MA、可卡因、多种药物使用和心理健康需求的服务。多种药物使用者特别需要这些服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信