Serum beta-hCG titers do not predict ruptured ectopic pregnancy.

Kevin Galstyan, Richard B Kurzel
{"title":"Serum beta-hCG titers do not predict ruptured ectopic pregnancy.","authors":"Kevin Galstyan,&nbsp;Richard B Kurzel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the relationship of serum beta-hCG titers in unruptured (U) vs. ruptured (R) tubal ectopic pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>183 consecutive tubal ectopic pregnancies, confirmed by surgery and/or pathology, were classified as unruptured (n=108), or ruptured (n=75). Serum beta-hCG was noted directly before the surgery. Patients treated with methotrexate were excluded. The two groups were compared for patient age, gravidity (G), parity (P), gestational age at rupture, and serum beta-hCG level. Differences were analyzed using the Student's paired t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were seen for patient age, G or P between the two groups (U vs. R). Gestational age at rupture was significantly higher (p = 0.01) in the ruptured ectopics (U: mean = 6.9 wks., s.d.= 2.2 wks; R: mean = 7.7 wks, s.d. = 2.5 wks). The range in serum beta-hCG was broad for both groups. For U: range = 15-89,504 I.U./L, mean 10,620 I.U./L, s.d. = 17,521 I.U./L. For R: range = 8-75,071 I.U./L, mean = 11,907 I.U./L, s.d. = 17,320 I.U./L (P > .25-N.S.).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Serum beta-hCG by itself cannot predict whether a tubal ectopic pregnancy is likely to be ruptured; there is no safe lower limit in hCG titer below which ruptured ectopic is not seen.</p>","PeriodicalId":50324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility and Womens Medicine","volume":"51 1","pages":"14-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility and Womens Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the relationship of serum beta-hCG titers in unruptured (U) vs. ruptured (R) tubal ectopic pregnancies.

Method: 183 consecutive tubal ectopic pregnancies, confirmed by surgery and/or pathology, were classified as unruptured (n=108), or ruptured (n=75). Serum beta-hCG was noted directly before the surgery. Patients treated with methotrexate were excluded. The two groups were compared for patient age, gravidity (G), parity (P), gestational age at rupture, and serum beta-hCG level. Differences were analyzed using the Student's paired t-test.

Results: No significant differences were seen for patient age, G or P between the two groups (U vs. R). Gestational age at rupture was significantly higher (p = 0.01) in the ruptured ectopics (U: mean = 6.9 wks., s.d.= 2.2 wks; R: mean = 7.7 wks, s.d. = 2.5 wks). The range in serum beta-hCG was broad for both groups. For U: range = 15-89,504 I.U./L, mean 10,620 I.U./L, s.d. = 17,521 I.U./L. For R: range = 8-75,071 I.U./L, mean = 11,907 I.U./L, s.d. = 17,320 I.U./L (P > .25-N.S.).

Conclusions: Serum beta-hCG by itself cannot predict whether a tubal ectopic pregnancy is likely to be ruptured; there is no safe lower limit in hCG titer below which ruptured ectopic is not seen.

血清β - hcg滴度不能预测宫外孕破裂。
目的:探讨未破裂(U)与破裂(R)输卵管异位妊娠血清β - hcg滴度的关系。方法:连续183例经手术或病理证实的输卵管异位妊娠分为未破裂型(108例)和破裂型(75例)。术前直接检测血清β - hcg。排除用甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者。比较两组患者的年龄、妊娠(G)、胎次(P)、破裂胎龄和血清β - hcg水平。差异分析采用学生配对t检验。结果:两组患者年龄、G、P差异无统计学意义(U vs R),异位破裂胎龄显著增高(P = 0.01) (U:平均= 6.9周)。, sd = 2.2周;R:平均= 7.7周,标准差= 2.5周)。两组血清β - hcg变化范围广。对于U:范围= 15-89,504国际单位/升,平均10,620国际单位/升,s.d = 17,521国际单位/升。R:范围= 8 - 75071国际单位/ L,意味着= 11907国际单位/ L,南达科他州。= 17320国际单位/ L (P > .25-N.S)。结论:血清β - hcg本身不能预测输卵管异位妊娠是否可能破裂;hCG滴度没有安全下限,低于该下限未见破裂异位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信