Physical rehabilitation and burnout: different aspects of the syndrome and comparison between healthcare professionals involved.

Europa medicophysica Pub Date : 2006-03-01
S Li Calzi, M Farinelli, M Ercolani, M Alianti, V Manigrasso, A M Taroni
{"title":"Physical rehabilitation and burnout: different aspects of the syndrome and comparison between healthcare professionals involved.","authors":"S Li Calzi,&nbsp;M Farinelli,&nbsp;M Ercolani,&nbsp;M Alianti,&nbsp;V Manigrasso,&nbsp;A M Taroni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate burnout syndrome among physical rehabilitation professionals focusing on the differences between 4 categories of healthcare professionals involved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The experimental group consisted of 124 physiotherapy workers chosen among physicians, nurses, therapists, and technicians. The variables we chose to measure were: the presence of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and lack of personal accomplishment), feelings of depression and anger, symptoms of psychological uneasiness and the level of perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall the level of burnout experienced was medium-low. Emotional exhaustion was more prevalent among physiotherapists, while depersonalization was higher among physicians. Moreover mild feelings of depression emerged among technicians. No differences were found among the 4 categories when feelings of anger were considered, although anger was present at different levels (and more or less expressed) throughout the working environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some considerations on the nature and possible causes of psychological distress emerged from the work carried out with the groups of healthcare professionals and some possible areas of intervention are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":87180,"journal":{"name":"Europa medicophysica","volume":"42 1","pages":"27-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europa medicophysica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate burnout syndrome among physical rehabilitation professionals focusing on the differences between 4 categories of healthcare professionals involved.

Methods: The experimental group consisted of 124 physiotherapy workers chosen among physicians, nurses, therapists, and technicians. The variables we chose to measure were: the presence of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and lack of personal accomplishment), feelings of depression and anger, symptoms of psychological uneasiness and the level of perceived stress.

Results: Overall the level of burnout experienced was medium-low. Emotional exhaustion was more prevalent among physiotherapists, while depersonalization was higher among physicians. Moreover mild feelings of depression emerged among technicians. No differences were found among the 4 categories when feelings of anger were considered, although anger was present at different levels (and more or less expressed) throughout the working environment.

Conclusions: Some considerations on the nature and possible causes of psychological distress emerged from the work carried out with the groups of healthcare professionals and some possible areas of intervention are suggested.

物理康复和倦怠:不同方面的综合征和比较之间的医护人员参与。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨身体康复专业人员的倦怠综合征,重点关注4类医疗保健专业人员之间的差异。方法:实验组由124名物理治疗工作者组成,这些工作者分别是内科医生、护士、治疗师和技术人员。我们选择测量的变量是:倦怠的存在(情绪衰竭、人格解体和缺乏个人成就感)、抑郁和愤怒的感觉、心理不安的症状和感知压力的水平。结果:职业倦怠总体水平为中低水平。情绪耗竭在物理治疗师中更为普遍,而人格解体在医生中更为普遍。此外,技术人员也出现了轻微的抑郁情绪。当考虑到愤怒的感觉时,四种类型之间没有发现差异,尽管愤怒在整个工作环境中以不同的水平(或多或少地表达)存在。结论:通过与医疗保健专业人员的合作,对心理困扰的性质和可能的原因提出了一些考虑,并提出了一些可能的干预领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书