Early rehabilitative treatment in patients with traumatic brain injuries: outcome at one-year follow-up.

Europa medicophysica Pub Date : 2006-03-01
P Mammi, B Zaccaria, M Franceschini
{"title":"Early rehabilitative treatment in patients with traumatic brain injuries: outcome at one-year follow-up.","authors":"P Mammi,&nbsp;B Zaccaria,&nbsp;M Franceschini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome at one-year follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI) after 4 years of application of our organizing model and compare our results with the international data in terms of disability (functional independence measure [FIM], disability rating scale [DRS] scores) and social integration (community integration questionnaire [CIQ], work reentry)</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We started a routine based on the presence of the physiatrist in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Neurosurgery 3 times per week to evaluate all patients with TBI, program and control physiotherapeutic treatments and transfers to rehabilitative centers. Data were collected considering 80 TBI patients sequentially discharged from our department, from August 1999 to December 2003. The sample was composed of patients with severe brain injury evaluated at rehabilitation admission, rehabilitation discharge and one-year follow-up. We compared our data with those of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Data Base (TBI MSDB) and Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio delle Cerebrolesioni Acquisite Riabilitazione (GISCAR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disability at one-year follow-up was better than at discharge: increase in FIM value, in DRS value. Social reintegration and return to work were not optimal: CIQ value was 16 and only 38% of patients returned to work at follow-up. Disability and social integration mean scores in our sample were similar to those obtained in TBI MSDB and so were the values of onset-admission interval (OAI) and length of stay (LOS). Differences were found with the Italian GISCAR database where mean OAI and LOS were higher than in our sample (55 and 86 days vs 18 and 37 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data show that this kind of organizing model for the rehabilitative evolution of TBI patients can positively influence the cost-efficiency rate of rehabilitation process reducing care costs in terms of ICU and rehabilitation LOS without affecting outcome in terms of disability and reintegration.</p>","PeriodicalId":87180,"journal":{"name":"Europa medicophysica","volume":"42 1","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europa medicophysica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome at one-year follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI) after 4 years of application of our organizing model and compare our results with the international data in terms of disability (functional independence measure [FIM], disability rating scale [DRS] scores) and social integration (community integration questionnaire [CIQ], work reentry)

Methods: We started a routine based on the presence of the physiatrist in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Neurosurgery 3 times per week to evaluate all patients with TBI, program and control physiotherapeutic treatments and transfers to rehabilitative centers. Data were collected considering 80 TBI patients sequentially discharged from our department, from August 1999 to December 2003. The sample was composed of patients with severe brain injury evaluated at rehabilitation admission, rehabilitation discharge and one-year follow-up. We compared our data with those of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Data Base (TBI MSDB) and Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio delle Cerebrolesioni Acquisite Riabilitazione (GISCAR).

Results: Disability at one-year follow-up was better than at discharge: increase in FIM value, in DRS value. Social reintegration and return to work were not optimal: CIQ value was 16 and only 38% of patients returned to work at follow-up. Disability and social integration mean scores in our sample were similar to those obtained in TBI MSDB and so were the values of onset-admission interval (OAI) and length of stay (LOS). Differences were found with the Italian GISCAR database where mean OAI and LOS were higher than in our sample (55 and 86 days vs 18 and 37 days).

Conclusions: Our data show that this kind of organizing model for the rehabilitative evolution of TBI patients can positively influence the cost-efficiency rate of rehabilitation process reducing care costs in terms of ICU and rehabilitation LOS without affecting outcome in terms of disability and reintegration.

外伤性脑损伤患者的早期康复治疗:一年随访的结果。
目的:本研究的目的是分析创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在应用我们的组织模型4年后的1年随访结果,并将我们的结果与国际上在残疾(功能独立性测量[FIM]、残疾评定量表[DRS]评分)和社会融合(社区融入问卷[CIQ]、再就业)方面的数据进行比较。我们开始了一项基于物理医生在重症监护室(ICU)和神经外科每周3次的例行工作,以评估所有TBI患者,规划和控制物理治疗治疗并转移到康复中心。资料收集自1999年8月至2003年12月在我科连续出院的80例TBI患者。样本由重型颅脑损伤患者组成,在康复入院、康复出院和一年随访时进行评估。我们将我们的数据与创伤性脑损伤模型系统数据库(TBI MSDB)和意大利脑损伤研究中心(GISCAR)的数据进行比较。结果:随访1年时失能情况优于出院时,FIM值、DRS值均有所升高。重新融入社会和重返工作岗位并不理想:CIQ值为16,随访时只有38%的患者重返工作岗位。在我们的样本中,残疾和社会融合的平均得分与TBI MSDB的结果相似,发病-入院间隔(OAI)和住院时间(LOS)的值也相似。意大利GISCAR数据库发现差异,其中平均OAI和LOS高于我们的样本(55天和86天vs 18天和37天)。结论:我们的数据表明,这种TBI患者康复演变的组织模式可以积极影响康复过程的成本效率,降低ICU和康复LOS方面的护理成本,而不影响残疾和重返社会方面的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书