A within-subjects validation of a group-administered timeline followback for alcohol use.

Eric R Pedersen, Joseph W LaBrie
{"title":"A within-subjects validation of a group-administered timeline followback for alcohol use.","authors":"Eric R Pedersen,&nbsp;Joseph W LaBrie","doi":"10.15288/jsa.2006.67.332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study uses a within-subjects randomized design with the Timeline Followback (TLFB) method administered in groups or to individuals to determine the equivalence of these methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred and four male and female college students who reported drinking at least once in the past 3 months completed the TLFB during a one-on-one interview, as well as in a group setting days apart. The two administrations were counterbalanced among the participants. Drinking variables assessed were drinking days, average drinks, total drinks, and maximum drinks consumed both during a 3-month (90 days) and a 1-month (30 days) period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measures analyses revealed no differences within subjects between the individual TLFB and the group TLFB on any of the four assessed drinking variables in the past 3 months and the past 1 month. Pearson's correlation coefficients revealed strong and significant correlations between the two administration styles. Heavy episodic drinking behavior was similar across administration styles as well. No differences between administration styles were consistent regardless of which administration was received first.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggests that the group TLFB yields similarly accurate results to the previously validated individual TLFB. The group-administered TLFB could be used in clinical and research settings as an efficient means of collecting information from large numbers of individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":17092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol","volume":"67 2","pages":"332-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.332","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Objective: The current study uses a within-subjects randomized design with the Timeline Followback (TLFB) method administered in groups or to individuals to determine the equivalence of these methods.

Method: One hundred and four male and female college students who reported drinking at least once in the past 3 months completed the TLFB during a one-on-one interview, as well as in a group setting days apart. The two administrations were counterbalanced among the participants. Drinking variables assessed were drinking days, average drinks, total drinks, and maximum drinks consumed both during a 3-month (90 days) and a 1-month (30 days) period.

Results: Repeated measures analyses revealed no differences within subjects between the individual TLFB and the group TLFB on any of the four assessed drinking variables in the past 3 months and the past 1 month. Pearson's correlation coefficients revealed strong and significant correlations between the two administration styles. Heavy episodic drinking behavior was similar across administration styles as well. No differences between administration styles were consistent regardless of which administration was received first.

Conclusions: The study suggests that the group TLFB yields similarly accurate results to the previously validated individual TLFB. The group-administered TLFB could be used in clinical and research settings as an efficient means of collecting information from large numbers of individuals.

小组管理的酒精使用时间回访的受试者内部验证。
目的:本研究采用受试者内随机设计,采用时间轴回访法(TLFB)分组或对个体进行,以确定这些方法的等效性。方法:104名在过去3个月内至少饮酒一次的男女大学生在一对一的访谈中完成了TLFB,并在间隔几天的小组中完成了TLFB。两届政府在与会者中势均力敌。评估的饮酒变量包括3个月(90天)和1个月(30天)期间的饮酒天数、平均饮酒量、总饮酒量和最大饮酒量。结果:重复测量分析显示,在过去3个月和过去1个月内,个体TLFB和组TLFB在四个评估的饮酒变量中的任何一个上都没有差异。Pearson相关系数显示两种管理方式之间存在强烈且显著的相关性。在不同的管理风格中,严重的间歇性饮酒行为也很相似。无论哪一种管理方式首先被接受,管理风格之间的差异都是一致的。结论:该研究表明,群体TLFB与先前验证的个体TLFB产生相似的准确结果。小组管理的TLFB可用于临床和研究环境,作为从大量个体收集信息的有效手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信