Predictors of abstinence and nonproblem drinking after 12-step treatment in Sweden.

Maria C Bodin, Anders Romelsjö
{"title":"Predictors of abstinence and nonproblem drinking after 12-step treatment in Sweden.","authors":"Maria C Bodin,&nbsp;Anders Romelsjö","doi":"10.15288/jsa.2006.67.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to identify individual predictors of 12 months continuous abstinence and nonproblem drinking after Swedish inpatient Minnesota Model treatment and to evaluate the outcome variance explained by pretreatment, within-treatment, and posttreatment factors for each outcome, separately and in conjunction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One-hundred and twenty-nine men and 47 women were interviewed on admission to Swedish Minnesota Model treatment and after 12 months. Two interviewers who were not involved in treatment delivery performed structured interviews. Statistical analyses included bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models applied to pair-wise contrasts of three types of treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final multivariate models for the three pair-wise contrasts explained 71% (abstinence vs problem drinking), 44% (nonproblem drinking vs problem drinking), and 25% (abstinence vs. nonproblem drinking) of outcome variance. Abstention and nonproblem drinking were both differentiated from problem drinking by the completion of aftercare, satisfaction with treatment, and number of public addiction care contacts. When contrasted with nonproblem drinking, abstention was predicted by the endorsement of a baseline goal to stop drinking and a higher degree of posttreatment affiliation with mutual-help groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study support the fact that treatment is only one of many factors that contributes to an outcome and suggests issues that may need consideration in similar treatment settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol","volume":"67 1","pages":"139-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.139","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to identify individual predictors of 12 months continuous abstinence and nonproblem drinking after Swedish inpatient Minnesota Model treatment and to evaluate the outcome variance explained by pretreatment, within-treatment, and posttreatment factors for each outcome, separately and in conjunction.

Method: One-hundred and twenty-nine men and 47 women were interviewed on admission to Swedish Minnesota Model treatment and after 12 months. Two interviewers who were not involved in treatment delivery performed structured interviews. Statistical analyses included bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models applied to pair-wise contrasts of three types of treatment outcome.

Results: The final multivariate models for the three pair-wise contrasts explained 71% (abstinence vs problem drinking), 44% (nonproblem drinking vs problem drinking), and 25% (abstinence vs. nonproblem drinking) of outcome variance. Abstention and nonproblem drinking were both differentiated from problem drinking by the completion of aftercare, satisfaction with treatment, and number of public addiction care contacts. When contrasted with nonproblem drinking, abstention was predicted by the endorsement of a baseline goal to stop drinking and a higher degree of posttreatment affiliation with mutual-help groups.

Conclusions: Results from this study support the fact that treatment is only one of many factors that contributes to an outcome and suggests issues that may need consideration in similar treatment settings.

瑞典12步治疗后戒酒和无问题饮酒的预测因素。
目的:本研究的目的是确定瑞典住院患者明尼苏达州模型治疗后12个月持续戒酒和无问题饮酒的个体预测因素,并评估每个结果分别或联合使用前、治疗内和治疗后因素解释的结果方差。方法:129名男性和47名女性在接受瑞典明尼苏达模式治疗时和12个月后接受访谈。两名不参与治疗交付的采访者进行了结构化访谈。统计分析包括双变量和多变量逻辑回归模型,用于三种治疗结果的两两对比。结果:三个两两对比的最终多变量模型解释了71%(戒酒vs有问题饮酒)、44%(无问题饮酒vs有问题饮酒)和25%(戒酒vs无问题饮酒)的结果方差。戒酒和非问题性饮酒与问题性饮酒都是通过康复的完成程度、对治疗的满意度和公共成瘾治疗接触的次数来区分的。与无问题饮酒相比,戒酒是通过对戒酒基线目标的认可和治疗后与互助团体的更高程度的联系来预测的。结论:本研究的结果支持这样一个事实,即治疗只是影响结果的众多因素之一,并提出了在类似治疗环境中可能需要考虑的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信