Does mycophenolate mofetil increase the incidence of infections in renal transplant recipients?

E Prokopenko, E Scherbakova, A Vatazin, S Pasov, N Budnikova, S Agafonova
{"title":"Does mycophenolate mofetil increase the incidence of infections in renal transplant recipients?","authors":"E Prokopenko,&nbsp;E Scherbakova,&nbsp;A Vatazin,&nbsp;S Pasov,&nbsp;N Budnikova,&nbsp;S Agafonova","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate infectious complications in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for prevention of acute transplant rejection. A group of RTRs (n = 47) receiving 1.0-2.0 g/day of MMF with cyclosporine A (CsA) and prednisolone to maintain immunosuppression was compared with a group (n = 47) taking triple immunosuppressive therapy including azathioprine. In both groups the etiology and incidence of infections were evaluated. During 2 years post-transplant, various infections developed in 72.3% of patients who received MMF and in 93.6% of those who received azathioprine. The incidence of viral infections was 53.2% in the MMF group and 59.6% in the azathioprine group and the incidence of bacterial infection was 55.3% and 70.2%, respectively There were two cases of active tuberculosis in the azathioprine group and one in the MMF group. MMF 1.0-2.0 g/day does not increase infection rates in RTRs compared with azathioprine.</p>","PeriodicalId":11336,"journal":{"name":"Drugs under experimental and clinical research","volume":"31 5-6","pages":"199-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs under experimental and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate infectious complications in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for prevention of acute transplant rejection. A group of RTRs (n = 47) receiving 1.0-2.0 g/day of MMF with cyclosporine A (CsA) and prednisolone to maintain immunosuppression was compared with a group (n = 47) taking triple immunosuppressive therapy including azathioprine. In both groups the etiology and incidence of infections were evaluated. During 2 years post-transplant, various infections developed in 72.3% of patients who received MMF and in 93.6% of those who received azathioprine. The incidence of viral infections was 53.2% in the MMF group and 59.6% in the azathioprine group and the incidence of bacterial infection was 55.3% and 70.2%, respectively There were two cases of active tuberculosis in the azathioprine group and one in the MMF group. MMF 1.0-2.0 g/day does not increase infection rates in RTRs compared with azathioprine.

霉酚酸酯会增加肾移植受者感染的发生率吗?
本研究的目的是调查接受霉酚酸酯(MMF)预防急性移植排斥反应的肾移植受者(RTRs)的感染并发症。将接受1.0-2.0 g/d MMF联合环孢素A (CsA)和强的松龙维持免疫抑制的rtr组(n = 47)与接受包括硫唑嘌呤在内的三联免疫抑制治疗的rtr组(n = 47)进行比较。评估两组患者的病因及感染发生率。移植后2年内,72.3%接受MMF治疗的患者和93.6%接受硫唑嘌呤治疗的患者出现各种感染。MMF组和硫唑嘌呤组的病毒感染发生率分别为53.2%和59.6%,细菌感染发生率分别为55.3%和70.2%,硫唑嘌呤组和MMF组分别有2例和1例活动性结核。与硫唑嘌呤相比,MMF 1.0-2.0 g/天不会增加RTRs的感染率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信