[Comparing studies on the differences of CCl4 liver injury and immunity liver injury mice models].

Shi yan sheng wu xue bao Pub Date : 2005-10-01
Yong Chen, Ming Cheng, Feng Mei Han, Peng Du
{"title":"[Comparing studies on the differences of CCl4 liver injury and immunity liver injury mice models].","authors":"Yong Chen,&nbsp;Ming Cheng,&nbsp;Feng Mei Han,&nbsp;Peng Du","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparison between CCl4 liver injury model and immunity liver injury model was studied through physiological, biochemical and gene expression profile methods, and the pathological mechanism of them were discussed. There are significant changes about the physiological, biochemical parameters including ALT,AST between two model groups and normal control group. Among the 14112 target genes, 379 and 293 differentially expressed genes were screened out from the both two model groups respectively in gene expression profile experiments, including 105 common, differentially expressed genes. The results indicate that the two models of CCl4 and immunity have some similarities. However, the differences between them are also obvious. It is useful for the further investigation on the liver-injury mechanism and pathological process of the two different liver-injury models.</p>","PeriodicalId":77395,"journal":{"name":"Shi yan sheng wu xue bao","volume":"38 5","pages":"417-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shi yan sheng wu xue bao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparison between CCl4 liver injury model and immunity liver injury model was studied through physiological, biochemical and gene expression profile methods, and the pathological mechanism of them were discussed. There are significant changes about the physiological, biochemical parameters including ALT,AST between two model groups and normal control group. Among the 14112 target genes, 379 and 293 differentially expressed genes were screened out from the both two model groups respectively in gene expression profile experiments, including 105 common, differentially expressed genes. The results indicate that the two models of CCl4 and immunity have some similarities. However, the differences between them are also obvious. It is useful for the further investigation on the liver-injury mechanism and pathological process of the two different liver-injury models.

[CCl4肝损伤与免疫性肝损伤小鼠模型差异的比较研究]。
通过生理生化及基因表达谱等方法对CCl4肝损伤模型与免疫性肝损伤模型进行比较,并探讨其病理机制。与正常对照组相比,模型组大鼠ALT、AST等生理生化指标均有显著变化。在14112个靶基因中,基因表达谱实验从两个模型组中分别筛选出差异表达基因379个和293个,其中常见、差异表达基因105个。结果表明,CCl4和免疫两种模型具有一定的相似性。然而,它们之间的差异也很明显。这有助于进一步探讨两种不同肝损伤模型的肝损伤机制和病理过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信