Prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: a pooled analysis of two randomized studies.

Aristotle Bamias, George Basdanis, Ioannis Xanthakis, Nicholas Pavlidis, George Fountzilas
{"title":"Prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: a pooled analysis of two randomized studies.","authors":"Aristotle Bamias,&nbsp;George Basdanis,&nbsp;Ioannis Xanthakis,&nbsp;Nicholas Pavlidis,&nbsp;George Fountzilas","doi":"10.1385/IJGC:36:1:029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the TNM system is useful in predicting survival in resected colorectal cancer, heterogeneity within the same stages regarding prognosis exists. We are presenting a pooled analysis of prognostic factors from two randomized studies of adjuvant treatment conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with stage II or III colon (n = 279) or rectal (n = 220) cancer were included in this analysis. Following surgery, patients received: 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) (n = 135), 5-FU/LV and interferon Alfa-2a (IFNA-2a) (n = 138), 5-FU/LV and pelvic chemoradiotherapy (n = 106), and pelvic chemoradiotherapy alone (n = 108).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow up was 92 mo. The number of involved lymph nodes (LNs), tumor differentiation, and the presence of regional implants were independent prognostic factors for both OS and TTP, while nerve invasion was only significant for TTP. Patients were stratified into three prognostic groups (low-risk: no LNs and grade 1/2; high-risk: > 3 LNs and grade 3/4; intermediate-risk: remaining patients) with distinct differences in 5-yr survival (84.7% vs 57.6% vs 32.4%) and 5-yr TTP (81.2% vs 54.5% vs 28.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of clinicopathological prognostic factors can be more informative than the traditional TNM staging system. Such stratification may be necessary in randomized trials and could be useful in deciding the most appropriate adjuvant treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":84927,"journal":{"name":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","volume":"36 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1385/IJGC:36:1:029","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:36:1:029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Although the TNM system is useful in predicting survival in resected colorectal cancer, heterogeneity within the same stages regarding prognosis exists. We are presenting a pooled analysis of prognostic factors from two randomized studies of adjuvant treatment conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

Patients and methods: Patients with stage II or III colon (n = 279) or rectal (n = 220) cancer were included in this analysis. Following surgery, patients received: 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) (n = 135), 5-FU/LV and interferon Alfa-2a (IFNA-2a) (n = 138), 5-FU/LV and pelvic chemoradiotherapy (n = 106), and pelvic chemoradiotherapy alone (n = 108).

Results: Median follow up was 92 mo. The number of involved lymph nodes (LNs), tumor differentiation, and the presence of regional implants were independent prognostic factors for both OS and TTP, while nerve invasion was only significant for TTP. Patients were stratified into three prognostic groups (low-risk: no LNs and grade 1/2; high-risk: > 3 LNs and grade 3/4; intermediate-risk: remaining patients) with distinct differences in 5-yr survival (84.7% vs 57.6% vs 32.4%) and 5-yr TTP (81.2% vs 54.5% vs 28.6%).

Conclusion: The combination of clinicopathological prognostic factors can be more informative than the traditional TNM staging system. Such stratification may be necessary in randomized trials and could be useful in deciding the most appropriate adjuvant treatment strategies.

结直肠癌患者接受辅助化疗或放化疗的预后因素:两项随机研究的汇总分析
背景:虽然TNM系统在预测结直肠癌切除后的生存方面是有用的,但在同一阶段内,预后存在异质性。我们将对希腊肿瘤合作小组进行的辅助治疗的两项随机研究的预后因素进行汇总分析。患者和方法:II期或III期结肠癌(n = 279)或直肠癌(n = 220)患者纳入本分析。术后,患者分别接受5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸素(5-FU/LV) (n = 135)、5-FU/LV联合干扰素α -2a (IFNA-2a) (n = 138)、5-FU/LV联合盆腔放化疗(n = 106)和盆腔放化疗(n = 108)。结果:中位随访时间为92个月。累及淋巴结(LNs)的数量、肿瘤分化和局部植入物的存在是OS和TTP的独立预后因素,而神经侵犯仅在TTP中有意义。患者被分为三个预后组(低危组:无LNs和1/2级;高危:> 3ln, 3/4级;5年生存率(84.7% vs 57.6% vs 32.4%)和5年TTP (81.2% vs 54.5% vs 28.6%)存在显著差异。结论:与传统的TNM分期系统相比,临床病理预后因素的结合可以提供更多的信息。这样的分层在随机试验中可能是必要的,在决定最合适的辅助治疗策略时可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信