Intervention trial to assess arsenic exposure from food crops in Bangladesh.

Geetha Ranmuthugala, Abul H Milton, Wayne T Smith, Jack C Ng, Malcolm Sim, Keith Dear, Bruce K Caldwell
{"title":"Intervention trial to assess arsenic exposure from food crops in Bangladesh.","authors":"Geetha Ranmuthugala,&nbsp;Abul H Milton,&nbsp;Wayne T Smith,&nbsp;Jack C Ng,&nbsp;Malcolm Sim,&nbsp;Keith Dear,&nbsp;Bruce K Caldwell","doi":"10.3200/AEOH.59.4.209-212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors assessed the contribution of food irrigated with arsenic-contaminated water to human exposure to arsenic in Bangladesh. An intervention trial was conducted in a village in the Jessore District of Bangladesh, where irrigation water had been field-tested in March 2000 and was found to contain arsenic with concentrations ranging from 100 to 500 microg/l. In May 2000, a random sample of 63 households was selected from the village, and 1 eligible person from each household was recruited to the study and randomized to an intervention or control group. The intervention group received food purchased from a village where irrigation water was found to contain < 10 microg/l arsenic. The control group received food purchased from markets in the study village, where irrigation water was found to contain > 100 microg/l arsenic. Pre- and postintervention urine samples were collected for urinary arsenic speciation assays. Preintervention, the mean urinary total arsenic concentrations were 139.25 microg/l and 129.15 microg/l for the intervention and control groups, respectively. These concentrations did not change significantly following intervention. Arsenic concentrations in samples of selected raw and cooked foods from the low-contamination area did not contain less arsenic than samples from the high-contamination area. Further studies to investigate the arsenic content of food grown in areas with high and low arsenic contamination of irrigation water are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":8155,"journal":{"name":"Archives of environmental health","volume":"59 4","pages":"209-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3200/AEOH.59.4.209-212","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3200/AEOH.59.4.209-212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The authors assessed the contribution of food irrigated with arsenic-contaminated water to human exposure to arsenic in Bangladesh. An intervention trial was conducted in a village in the Jessore District of Bangladesh, where irrigation water had been field-tested in March 2000 and was found to contain arsenic with concentrations ranging from 100 to 500 microg/l. In May 2000, a random sample of 63 households was selected from the village, and 1 eligible person from each household was recruited to the study and randomized to an intervention or control group. The intervention group received food purchased from a village where irrigation water was found to contain < 10 microg/l arsenic. The control group received food purchased from markets in the study village, where irrigation water was found to contain > 100 microg/l arsenic. Pre- and postintervention urine samples were collected for urinary arsenic speciation assays. Preintervention, the mean urinary total arsenic concentrations were 139.25 microg/l and 129.15 microg/l for the intervention and control groups, respectively. These concentrations did not change significantly following intervention. Arsenic concentrations in samples of selected raw and cooked foods from the low-contamination area did not contain less arsenic than samples from the high-contamination area. Further studies to investigate the arsenic content of food grown in areas with high and low arsenic contamination of irrigation water are recommended.

评估孟加拉国粮食作物砷暴露的干预试验。
这组作者评估了用砷污染的水灌溉的食物对孟加拉国人接触砷的影响。在孟加拉国Jessore区的一个村庄进行了一项干预试验,2000年3月对那里的灌溉水进行了实地测试,发现砷的浓度在100至500微克/升之间。2000年5月,从该村随机抽取63户家庭,每户1名符合条件的人加入研究,随机分为干预组或对照组。干预组收到的食物是从灌溉水中砷含量低于10微克/升的村庄购买的。对照组的食物是从研究村的市场购买的,那里的灌溉水被发现含有> 100微克/升的砷。收集干预前和干预后尿液样本进行尿砷形态分析。干预前,干预组和对照组的平均尿总砷浓度分别为139.25微克/升和129.15微克/升。这些浓度在干预后没有显著变化。低污染地区选定的生的和熟的食品样品中的砷含量并不比高污染地区样品中的砷含量低。建议进一步研究在灌溉水高砷污染和低砷污染地区种植的食物中的砷含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信