Estimating qualification and factors associated with third-line antiretroviral therapy referral in the Western Cape.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-28 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1184
Sadiyya Sheik, Bart Willems
{"title":"Estimating qualification and factors associated with third-line antiretroviral therapy referral in the Western Cape.","authors":"Sadiyya Sheik,&nbsp;Bart Willems","doi":"10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa's antiretroviral therapy (ART) programme is the largest globally and the universal test-and-treat policy is expected to increase the numbers on ART. This may have implications for treatment failure rates implying a greater future need for third-line regimens. South Africa initiated a third-line programme in 2013. However, there is little evidence quantifying the third-line need in this setting and the programme itself has not been formally evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study evaluated the third-line ART referral process in the Western Cape.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Routinely collected data were analysed to derive an estimate of patients meeting criteria for third-line referral and compared with patients who were referred. Factors associated with referral were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study period, 947 patients met criteria for third-line referral and 167 patients were referred. Comparison revealed a poor overlap of only 42 patients. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with referral included receiving care at a hospital rather than a primary healthcare facility (adjusted odd ratios [aOR] = 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.2), a higher number of viral load [VLs] ≥ 1000 copies/mL whilst on a protease inhibitor (PI) (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.42) and a greater number of years on a PI (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-1.46). Patients with a 6-month gap in dispensing were less likely to be referred (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study adds to a limited body of knowledge regarding third-line ART programmes. The findings indicate missed opportunities for and inappropriate referral of patients. Factors associated with referral were largely health system related. Clinician awareness and compliance with referral remain unknown and may be contributory.</p>","PeriodicalId":49489,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008132/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: South Africa's antiretroviral therapy (ART) programme is the largest globally and the universal test-and-treat policy is expected to increase the numbers on ART. This may have implications for treatment failure rates implying a greater future need for third-line regimens. South Africa initiated a third-line programme in 2013. However, there is little evidence quantifying the third-line need in this setting and the programme itself has not been formally evaluated.

Objectives: The study evaluated the third-line ART referral process in the Western Cape.

Method: Routinely collected data were analysed to derive an estimate of patients meeting criteria for third-line referral and compared with patients who were referred. Factors associated with referral were identified.

Results: In the study period, 947 patients met criteria for third-line referral and 167 patients were referred. Comparison revealed a poor overlap of only 42 patients. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with referral included receiving care at a hospital rather than a primary healthcare facility (adjusted odd ratios [aOR] = 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.2), a higher number of viral load [VLs] ≥ 1000 copies/mL whilst on a protease inhibitor (PI) (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.42) and a greater number of years on a PI (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-1.46). Patients with a 6-month gap in dispensing were less likely to be referred (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.81).

Conclusion: This study adds to a limited body of knowledge regarding third-line ART programmes. The findings indicate missed opportunities for and inappropriate referral of patients. Factors associated with referral were largely health system related. Clinician awareness and compliance with referral remain unknown and may be contributory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

估计西开普省三线抗逆转录病毒治疗转诊的资格和相关因素。
背景:南非的抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)规划是全球最大的,普遍的检测和治疗政策预计将增加抗逆转录病毒治疗的人数。这可能对治疗失败率有影响,意味着未来对三线治疗方案的需求更大。南非在2013年启动了一个三线项目。然而,在这种情况下,几乎没有量化第三线需求的证据,该方案本身也没有得到正式评价。目的:本研究评估了西开普省三线ART转诊过程。方法:对常规收集的数据进行分析,得出符合三线转诊标准的患者的估计,并与转诊的患者进行比较。确定了与转诊相关的因素。结果:在研究期间,947例患者符合三线转诊标准,167例患者转诊。比较显示只有42例患者重叠不良。在多变量分析中,与转诊相关的因素包括在医院而不是初级卫生保健机构接受治疗(调整奇数比[aOR] = 2.15, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.1-4.2),在使用蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)时,较高的病毒载量[VLs]≥1000 copies/mL (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.42)以及使用PI的年数(aOR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-1.46)。配药间隔6个月的患者不太可能转诊(aOR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.81)。结论:这项研究增加了关于三线抗逆转录病毒治疗计划的有限知识体系。研究结果表明,错过的机会和不适当的转诊患者。与转诊相关的因素主要与卫生系统有关。临床医生的意识和对转诊的依从性仍然未知,可能是原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine is focused on HIV/AIDS treatment, prevention and related topics relevant to clinical and public health practice. The purpose of the journal is to disseminate original research results and to support high-level learning related to HIV Medicine. It publishes original research articles, editorials, case reports/case series, reviews of state-of-the-art clinical practice, and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信