The effects of pulsed electromagnetic field on experimentally induced sciatic nerve injury in rats.

IF 1.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2021-07-03 Epub Date: 2021-04-02 DOI:10.1080/15368378.2021.1907403
Gülten Bademoğlu, Nurten Erdal, Coşar Uzun, Bahar Taşdelen
{"title":"The effects of pulsed electromagnetic field on experimentally induced sciatic nerve injury in rats.","authors":"Gülten Bademoğlu,&nbsp;Nurten Erdal,&nbsp;Coşar Uzun,&nbsp;Bahar Taşdelen","doi":"10.1080/15368378.2021.1907403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some experimental research indicates that low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation may accelerate regeneration in sciatic nerve injury. However, little research has examined the electrophysiological and functional properties of regenerating peripheral nerves under PEMF. The main aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of PEMF on sciatic nerve regeneration in short- and long-term processes with electrophysiologically and functionally after crushing damage. Crush lesions were performed using jewelery forceps for 30 s. After crush injury of the sciatic nerves, 24 female Wistar-Albino rats were divided into 3 groups with 8 rats in each group: SH(Sham), SNI (Sciatic Nerve Injury), SNI+PEMF(Sciatic Nerve Injury+Pulsed Electromagnetic Field). SNI+PEMF group was exposed to PEMF (4 h/day, intensity; 0.3mT, low-frequency; 2 Hz) for 40-days. Electrophysiological records (at the beginning and 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th weeks post-crush) and functional footprints (at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th weeks post crush) were measured from all groups during the experiment. The results were compared to SNI and SNI+PEMF groups, it was found that amplitude and area parameters in the first-week were significantly higher and latency was lower in the SNI+PEMF group than in the SNI group (<i>p</i> < 0,05). However, the effect of PEMF was not significant in the 2nd, 4th, 6th weeks. In addition, in the 1st and 2nd weeks, the SSI parameters were significantly higher in SNI+PMF group than SNI group (<i>p</i> < .05). These results indicate that low-frequency PEMF is not effective for long-periods of application time while PEMF may be useful during the short-term recovery period.</p>","PeriodicalId":50544,"journal":{"name":"Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine","volume":"40 3","pages":"408-419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15368378.2021.1907403","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2021.1907403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Some experimental research indicates that low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation may accelerate regeneration in sciatic nerve injury. However, little research has examined the electrophysiological and functional properties of regenerating peripheral nerves under PEMF. The main aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of PEMF on sciatic nerve regeneration in short- and long-term processes with electrophysiologically and functionally after crushing damage. Crush lesions were performed using jewelery forceps for 30 s. After crush injury of the sciatic nerves, 24 female Wistar-Albino rats were divided into 3 groups with 8 rats in each group: SH(Sham), SNI (Sciatic Nerve Injury), SNI+PEMF(Sciatic Nerve Injury+Pulsed Electromagnetic Field). SNI+PEMF group was exposed to PEMF (4 h/day, intensity; 0.3mT, low-frequency; 2 Hz) for 40-days. Electrophysiological records (at the beginning and 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th weeks post-crush) and functional footprints (at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th weeks post crush) were measured from all groups during the experiment. The results were compared to SNI and SNI+PEMF groups, it was found that amplitude and area parameters in the first-week were significantly higher and latency was lower in the SNI+PEMF group than in the SNI group (p < 0,05). However, the effect of PEMF was not significant in the 2nd, 4th, 6th weeks. In addition, in the 1st and 2nd weeks, the SSI parameters were significantly higher in SNI+PMF group than SNI group (p < .05). These results indicate that low-frequency PEMF is not effective for long-periods of application time while PEMF may be useful during the short-term recovery period.

脉冲电磁场对实验性大鼠坐骨神经损伤的影响。
一些实验研究表明,低频脉冲电磁场刺激可促进坐骨神经损伤后的再生。然而,关于PEMF下周围神经再生的电生理和功能特性的研究很少。本研究的主要目的是研究PEMF对坐骨神经损伤后短期和长期电生理和功能再生的影响。挤压性病变使用珠宝钳进行30 s。将24只雌性Wistar-Albino大鼠在坐骨神经挤压损伤后,分为3组,每组8只:SH(假手术)、SNI(坐骨神经损伤)、SNI+PEMF(坐骨神经损伤+脉冲电磁场)。SNI+PEMF组暴露于PEMF (4 h/d,强度;0.3公吨,低频;2赫兹),持续40天。在实验期间测量各组小鼠的电生理记录(开始时和压伤后第1、2、4、6周)和功能足迹(压伤后第1、2、3、4、5、6周)。结果与SNI和SNI+PEMF组比较,发现SNI+PEMF组第1周的幅度和面积参数明显高于SNI组,潜伏期明显低于SNI组(p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope: Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, publishes peer-reviewed research articles on the biological effects and medical applications of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (from extremely-low frequency to radiofrequency). Topic examples include in vitro and in vivo studies, epidemiological investigation, mechanism and mode of interaction between non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and biological systems. In addition to publishing original articles, the journal also publishes meeting summaries and reports, and reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信