Factors Associated With Myofascial Dysfunction of the Pelvic Floor Muscles in Women With Urinary Incontinence: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Amanda Martins Reis, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito, Anna Lygia Barbosa Lunardi, Camila Carvalho de Araújo, Cássia Raquel Teatin Juliato
{"title":"Factors Associated With Myofascial Dysfunction of the Pelvic Floor Muscles in Women With Urinary Incontinence: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Amanda Martins Reis,&nbsp;Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito,&nbsp;Anna Lygia Barbosa Lunardi,&nbsp;Camila Carvalho de Araújo,&nbsp;Cássia Raquel Teatin Juliato","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction (PFMD) in women with urinary incontinence (UI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed. Pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction was defined by pain of any intensity during palpation of the pelvic floor muscles and strength assessed by the modified Oxford scale, and was classified in grade I (mild pain), grade II (moderate), and grade III (severe). Univariate and multivariate analyses were calculated (5% significance level) to seek for the associated factors of PFMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 234 women with UI were included, 121 women in the PFMD group and 113 in the control group. The mean ages were 52.1 ± 10.2 and 53 ± 8.1 years, respectively. Pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction was more frequent among non-White women, and women with PFMD presented more dyspareunia and recurrent urinary tract infection. There was a higher frequency of mixed UI (MUI; 89.2%) in the PFMD group and stress UI (31.9%) in the control group. The prevalence of PFMD was 51.7%, with 10.6% of patients categorized into grade I, 18.8% in grade II, and 22.2% in grade III. In women with PFMD, there is an inverse relation between pain and muscle strength, with the highest strength values (3, 4, and 5) being in grade I (P = 0.028). The multivariate analysis has shown that women with MUI had a risk 4.9 times greater (adjusted odds ratio, 4.93 [2.34-10.42]; P < 0.001) of having PFMD, and non-White women had a 2.1-fold increased risk (adjusted odds ratio, 2.07 [1.10-3.91]; P = 0.024) of presenting with PFMD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high prevalence of PFMD was found among women with UI. Mixed UI and non-White race were the associated factors of PFMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"27 11","pages":"691-696"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction (PFMD) in women with urinary incontinence (UI).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed. Pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction was defined by pain of any intensity during palpation of the pelvic floor muscles and strength assessed by the modified Oxford scale, and was classified in grade I (mild pain), grade II (moderate), and grade III (severe). Univariate and multivariate analyses were calculated (5% significance level) to seek for the associated factors of PFMD.

Results: A total of 234 women with UI were included, 121 women in the PFMD group and 113 in the control group. The mean ages were 52.1 ± 10.2 and 53 ± 8.1 years, respectively. Pelvic floor myofascial dysfunction was more frequent among non-White women, and women with PFMD presented more dyspareunia and recurrent urinary tract infection. There was a higher frequency of mixed UI (MUI; 89.2%) in the PFMD group and stress UI (31.9%) in the control group. The prevalence of PFMD was 51.7%, with 10.6% of patients categorized into grade I, 18.8% in grade II, and 22.2% in grade III. In women with PFMD, there is an inverse relation between pain and muscle strength, with the highest strength values (3, 4, and 5) being in grade I (P = 0.028). The multivariate analysis has shown that women with MUI had a risk 4.9 times greater (adjusted odds ratio, 4.93 [2.34-10.42]; P < 0.001) of having PFMD, and non-White women had a 2.1-fold increased risk (adjusted odds ratio, 2.07 [1.10-3.91]; P = 0.024) of presenting with PFMD.

Conclusions: A high prevalence of PFMD was found among women with UI. Mixed UI and non-White race were the associated factors of PFMD.

尿失禁妇女盆底肌筋膜功能障碍相关因素:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估尿失禁(UI)女性盆底肌筋膜功能障碍(PFMD)的患病率及其相关因素。方法:横断面研究。盆底肌筋膜功能障碍的定义为触诊盆底肌肉时的任何强度的疼痛,并通过改良的牛津量表评估力量,分为I级(轻度疼痛)、II级(中度)和III级(重度)。计算单因素和多因素分析(5%显著性水平),寻找PFMD的相关因素。结果:共纳入234例尿失禁患者,其中PFMD组121例,对照组113例。平均年龄分别为52.1±10.2岁和53±8.1岁。盆底肌筋膜功能障碍在非白人女性中更为常见,PFMD女性出现更多的性交困难和复发性尿路感染。混合UI (MUI)发生率较高;PFMD组为89.2%,应激性UI组为31.9%。PFMD患病率为51.7%,其中10.6%的患者为I级,18.8%为II级,22.2%为III级。在患有PFMD的女性中,疼痛与肌肉力量呈反比关系,最高的力量值(3、4和5)为I级(P = 0.028)。多因素分析显示,MUI女性的风险高出4.9倍(校正优势比为4.93 [2.34-10.42];P < 0.001),非白人女性患PFMD的风险增加2.1倍(校正优势比为2.07 [1.10-3.91];P = 0.024)。结论:尿失禁患者中PFMD患病率较高。混合UI和非白种人是PFMD的相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信