Road traffic noise, noise sensitivity, noise annoyance, psychological and physical health and mortality.

Stephen Stansfeld, Charlotte Clark, Melanie Smuk, John Gallacher, Wolfgang Babisch
{"title":"Road traffic noise, noise sensitivity, noise annoyance, psychological and physical health and mortality.","authors":"Stephen Stansfeld,&nbsp;Charlotte Clark,&nbsp;Melanie Smuk,&nbsp;John Gallacher,&nbsp;Wolfgang Babisch","doi":"10.1186/s12940-021-00720-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both physical and psychological health outcomes have been associated with exposure to environmental noise. Noise sensitivity could have the same moderating effect on physical and psychological health outcomes related to environmental noise exposure as on annoyance but this has been little tested.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 2398 men between 45 and 59 years, the longitudinal Caerphilly Collaborative Heart Disease study, was established in 1984/88 and followed into the mid-1990s. Road traffic noise maps were assessed at baseline. Psychological ill-health was measured in phase 2 in 1984/88, phase 3 (1989/93) and phase 4 (1993/7). Ischaemic heart disease was measured in clinic at baseline and through hospital records and records of deaths during follow up. We examined the longitudinal associations between road traffic noise and ischaemic heart disease morbidity and mortality using Cox Proportional Hazard Models and psychological ill-health using Logistic Regression; we also examined whether noise sensitivity and noise annoyance might moderate these associations. We also tested if noise sensitivity and noise annoyance were longitudinal predictors of ischaemic heart disease morbidity and mortality and psychological ill-health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Road traffic noise was not associated with ischaemic heart disease morbidity or mortality. Neither noise sensitivity nor noise annoyance moderated the effects of road traffic noise on ischaemic heart disease morbidity or mortality. High noise sensitivity was associated with lower ischaemic heart disease mortality risk (HR = 0.74, 95%CI 0.57, 0.97). Road traffic noise was associated with Phase 4 psychological ill-health but only among those exposed to 56-60dBA (fully adjusted OR = 1.82 95%CI 1.07, 3.07). Noise sensitivity moderated the association of road traffic noise exposure with psychological ill-health. High noise sensitivity was associated longitudinally with psychological ill-health at phase 3 (OR = 1.85 95%CI 1.23, 2.78) and phase 4 (OR = 1.65 95%CI 1.09, 2.50). Noise annoyance predicted psychological ill-health at phase 4 (OR = 2.47 95%CI 1.00, 6.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Noise sensitivity is a specific predictor of psychological ill-health and may be part of a wider construct of environmental susceptibility. Noise sensitivity may increase the risk of psychological ill-health when exposed to road traffic noise. Noise annoyance may be a mediator of the effects of road traffic noise on psychological ill-health.</p>","PeriodicalId":520610,"journal":{"name":"Environmental health : a global access science source","volume":" ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12940-021-00720-3","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental health : a global access science source","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00720-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background: Both physical and psychological health outcomes have been associated with exposure to environmental noise. Noise sensitivity could have the same moderating effect on physical and psychological health outcomes related to environmental noise exposure as on annoyance but this has been little tested.

Methods: A cohort of 2398 men between 45 and 59 years, the longitudinal Caerphilly Collaborative Heart Disease study, was established in 1984/88 and followed into the mid-1990s. Road traffic noise maps were assessed at baseline. Psychological ill-health was measured in phase 2 in 1984/88, phase 3 (1989/93) and phase 4 (1993/7). Ischaemic heart disease was measured in clinic at baseline and through hospital records and records of deaths during follow up. We examined the longitudinal associations between road traffic noise and ischaemic heart disease morbidity and mortality using Cox Proportional Hazard Models and psychological ill-health using Logistic Regression; we also examined whether noise sensitivity and noise annoyance might moderate these associations. We also tested if noise sensitivity and noise annoyance were longitudinal predictors of ischaemic heart disease morbidity and mortality and psychological ill-health.

Results: Road traffic noise was not associated with ischaemic heart disease morbidity or mortality. Neither noise sensitivity nor noise annoyance moderated the effects of road traffic noise on ischaemic heart disease morbidity or mortality. High noise sensitivity was associated with lower ischaemic heart disease mortality risk (HR = 0.74, 95%CI 0.57, 0.97). Road traffic noise was associated with Phase 4 psychological ill-health but only among those exposed to 56-60dBA (fully adjusted OR = 1.82 95%CI 1.07, 3.07). Noise sensitivity moderated the association of road traffic noise exposure with psychological ill-health. High noise sensitivity was associated longitudinally with psychological ill-health at phase 3 (OR = 1.85 95%CI 1.23, 2.78) and phase 4 (OR = 1.65 95%CI 1.09, 2.50). Noise annoyance predicted psychological ill-health at phase 4 (OR = 2.47 95%CI 1.00, 6.13).

Conclusions: Noise sensitivity is a specific predictor of psychological ill-health and may be part of a wider construct of environmental susceptibility. Noise sensitivity may increase the risk of psychological ill-health when exposed to road traffic noise. Noise annoyance may be a mediator of the effects of road traffic noise on psychological ill-health.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

道路交通噪声,噪声敏感性,噪声烦恼,心理和身体健康和死亡率。
背景:身体和心理健康结果都与暴露于环境噪声有关。噪音敏感性对与环境噪音暴露相关的身心健康结果可能具有与烦恼相同的调节作用,但这一点几乎没有经过测试。方法:纵向卡菲利合作心脏病研究于1984/ 1988年建立,随访至20世纪90年代中期,共有2398名45 - 59岁的男性。道路交通噪音图以基线评估。心理健康不良在1984/88年分为第2阶段、第3阶段(1989/93年)和第4阶段(1993/7年)进行测量。在临床基线和通过医院记录和随访期间的死亡记录测量缺血性心脏病。我们使用Cox比例风险模型检验了道路交通噪声与缺血性心脏病发病率和死亡率之间的纵向关联,并使用Logistic回归检验了心理健康不良之间的纵向关联;我们还研究了噪音敏感性和噪音烦恼是否会缓和这些关联。我们还测试了噪音敏感性和噪音烦恼是否是缺血性心脏病发病率和死亡率以及心理健康不良的纵向预测因子。结果:道路交通噪声与缺血性心脏病的发病率和死亡率无关。噪音敏感性和噪音烦恼都没有减缓道路交通噪音对缺血性心脏病发病率或死亡率的影响。高噪声敏感性与较低的缺血性心脏病死亡风险相关(HR = 0.74, 95%CI 0.57, 0.97)。道路交通噪音与第4阶段心理健康不良有关,但仅在暴露于56-60dBA的人群中(完全调整OR = 1.82 95%CI 1.07, 3.07)。噪声敏感性调节了道路交通噪声暴露与心理健康不良之间的关系。在第3阶段(OR = 1.85 95%CI 1.23, 2.78)和第4阶段(OR = 1.65 95%CI 1.09, 2.50),高噪声敏感性与心理健康不良呈纵向相关。噪音烦恼预测心理健康不良在第4阶段(OR = 2.47 95%CI 1.00, 6.13)。结论:噪声敏感性是心理健康不良的特定预测因子,可能是更广泛的环境敏感性结构的一部分。当接触道路交通噪音时,噪音敏感性可能会增加心理健康不良的风险。噪声烦恼可能是道路交通噪声对心理健康不良影响的中介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信