Complexity of work with people: Associations with cognitive functioning and change after retirement.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-25 DOI:10.1037/pag0000584
María Vélez-Coto, Ross Andel, Miguel Pérez-García, Alfonso Caracuel
{"title":"Complexity of work with people: Associations with cognitive functioning and change after retirement.","authors":"María Vélez-Coto,&nbsp;Ross Andel,&nbsp;Miguel Pérez-García,&nbsp;Alfonso Caracuel","doi":"10.1037/pag0000584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retirement has been associated with cognitive decline. However, the influence of specific job characteristics like occupational complexity on post-retirement cognitive outcomes is not well understood. Data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study were used to examine occupational complexity in relation to cognitive performance and cognitive change after retirement. Initial sample included 471 workers between 45 and 75 years of age. At 9-year follow-up (T2), 149 were retired and 322 were still working. All six tasks from the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) were used. Hierarchical regression with workers at T1 indicated that, controlling for sociodemographic variables, complexity of work with people significantly contributed to explaining variance in overall cognitive performance (1.7%) and executive function (2%). In Latent Change Score (LCS) models, complexity of work with people was the only significant predictor of cognitive change in retirees, with those retiring from high-complexity jobs showing less decline. In conclusion, high complexity of work with people is related to better executive functioning and overall cognition during working life and slower decline after retirement. The finding that more intellectually stimulating work carries cognitive advantage into retirement fits the cognitive reserve concept, where earlier intellectual stimulation brings about lower risks of cognitive problems later. Study results also go along with the unengaged lifestyle hypothesis, whereby people may slip into so-called \"mental retirement,\" leading to post-retirement cognitive loss, which may be most apparent among those retiring from jobs with low complexity of work with people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":"36 2","pages":"143-157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000584","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Retirement has been associated with cognitive decline. However, the influence of specific job characteristics like occupational complexity on post-retirement cognitive outcomes is not well understood. Data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study were used to examine occupational complexity in relation to cognitive performance and cognitive change after retirement. Initial sample included 471 workers between 45 and 75 years of age. At 9-year follow-up (T2), 149 were retired and 322 were still working. All six tasks from the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) were used. Hierarchical regression with workers at T1 indicated that, controlling for sociodemographic variables, complexity of work with people significantly contributed to explaining variance in overall cognitive performance (1.7%) and executive function (2%). In Latent Change Score (LCS) models, complexity of work with people was the only significant predictor of cognitive change in retirees, with those retiring from high-complexity jobs showing less decline. In conclusion, high complexity of work with people is related to better executive functioning and overall cognition during working life and slower decline after retirement. The finding that more intellectually stimulating work carries cognitive advantage into retirement fits the cognitive reserve concept, where earlier intellectual stimulation brings about lower risks of cognitive problems later. Study results also go along with the unengaged lifestyle hypothesis, whereby people may slip into so-called "mental retirement," leading to post-retirement cognitive loss, which may be most apparent among those retiring from jobs with low complexity of work with people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

与人打交道的复杂性:与退休后认知功能和变化的关系。
退休与认知能力下降有关。然而,职业复杂性等特定工作特征对退休后认知结果的影响尚不清楚。来自美国中年研究(MIDUS)的数据被用来检验职业复杂性与退休后认知表现和认知变化的关系。最初的样本包括471名年龄在45岁到75岁之间的工人。随访9年(T2), 149人退休,322人仍在工作。采用了成人电话认知简短测验(BTACT)中的6个任务。在T1时,工人的层次回归表明,在控制社会人口变量的情况下,与人合作的复杂性显著地解释了总体认知表现(1.7%)和执行功能(2%)的差异。在潜在变化评分(LCS)模型中,与人打交道的复杂性是退休人员认知变化的唯一显著预测因素,那些从高复杂性工作中退休的人表现出较少的下降。综上所述,与人工作的高复杂性与工作期间更好的执行功能和整体认知有关,退休后下降速度较慢。研究发现,更多的智力刺激工作在退休后会带来认知优势,这符合认知储备概念,即早期的智力刺激会降低以后出现认知问题的风险。研究结果也支持“不投入生活方式”的假设,即人们可能会陷入所谓的“精神退休”,导致退休后的认知丧失,这在那些从与人打交道不那么复杂的工作中退休的人身上表现得最为明显。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信