Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Maíra Anelli Martins, Simone Aparecida Capellini
{"title":"Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures.","authors":"Maíra Anelli Martins,&nbsp;Simone Aparecida Capellini","doi":"10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To identify readers who are struggling or at risk of reading difficulties, reference standards in oral reading fluency (ORF) are used to conduct an assessment that is based on a widely reported method known as curriculum-based measurement (CBM), which itself is based on 1-min fluency measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate students' ORF (with a 1-min fluency measure) to characterize their fluency and to determine references of appropriate development in reading at the 50th percentile.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For this study, a database of readings made available by the Learning Studies Research Laboratory was used. This database consisted of 365 readings by elementary-school students from the third to fifth grades in two cities in the interior of the state of São Paulo from two different public school systems that use the same teaching methodology. The data consisted of digital audio recordings of the passage \"The Umbrella\" (text suitable for schooling levels) of the Protocol for Assessment of Reading Comprehension procedure. For this procedure, three steps were performed: step 1-listening to the 365 readings and assessing the scores for the number of words read correctly per minute; step 2-the calculation of the mean and percentiles for each grade; and step 3-the adaptation of the reference table to indicate students eligible to receive reading fluency intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Third-year students who correctly read 86 or more words per minute, fourth-year students who correctly read 104 or more words per minute, and fifth-year students who correctly read 117 or more words per minute were considered students who had made adequate progress in reading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was possible to classify students based on the 1-min fluency measures, with reference intervals of words read correctly per minute per school year (for the third, fourth, and fifth years) for those who were making adequate progress in reading and reference intervals for those who were considered readers who were struggling or at risk of reading difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":46901,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","volume":"34 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: To identify readers who are struggling or at risk of reading difficulties, reference standards in oral reading fluency (ORF) are used to conduct an assessment that is based on a widely reported method known as curriculum-based measurement (CBM), which itself is based on 1-min fluency measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate students' ORF (with a 1-min fluency measure) to characterize their fluency and to determine references of appropriate development in reading at the 50th percentile.

Method: For this study, a database of readings made available by the Learning Studies Research Laboratory was used. This database consisted of 365 readings by elementary-school students from the third to fifth grades in two cities in the interior of the state of São Paulo from two different public school systems that use the same teaching methodology. The data consisted of digital audio recordings of the passage "The Umbrella" (text suitable for schooling levels) of the Protocol for Assessment of Reading Comprehension procedure. For this procedure, three steps were performed: step 1-listening to the 365 readings and assessing the scores for the number of words read correctly per minute; step 2-the calculation of the mean and percentiles for each grade; and step 3-the adaptation of the reference table to indicate students eligible to receive reading fluency intervention.

Results: Third-year students who correctly read 86 or more words per minute, fourth-year students who correctly read 104 or more words per minute, and fifth-year students who correctly read 117 or more words per minute were considered students who had made adequate progress in reading.

Conclusion: It was possible to classify students based on the 1-min fluency measures, with reference intervals of words read correctly per minute per school year (for the third, fourth, and fifth years) for those who were making adequate progress in reading and reference intervals for those who were considered readers who were struggling or at risk of reading difficulties.

通过一分钟流畅度测试来识别阅读困难或有阅读困难风险的读者。
背景:为了识别正在挣扎或有阅读困难风险的读者,口头阅读流畅性(ORF)的参考标准被用来进行评估,该评估基于一种广泛报道的方法,即基于课程的测量(CBM),该方法本身基于1分钟流畅性测量。本研究的目的是评估学生的ORF(用1分钟流畅性测量),以表征他们的流畅性,并确定在第50百分位数上适当发展阅读的参考。方法:本研究使用了学习研究研究实验室提供的阅读数据库。该数据库由来自圣保罗州内陆两个城市的三年级到五年级的小学生的365篇阅读材料组成,这些学生来自两个不同的公立学校系统,使用相同的教学方法。数据包括阅读理解评估程序规程中段落“The Umbrella”(适合学校教育水平的文本)的数字录音。在这个过程中,有三个步骤:第一步-听365篇阅读材料,并评估每分钟正确阅读的单词数;步骤2-计算每个等级的平均值和百分位数;第三步-参考表的改编,以表明学生有资格接受阅读流利性干预。结果:三年级学生每分钟正确阅读86个或更多单词,四年级学生每分钟正确阅读104个或更多单词,五年级学生每分钟正确阅读117个或更多单词被认为是阅读取得了足够进步的学生。结论:可以根据1分钟流利度测量对学生进行分类,每学年(第三、第四和第五年)每分钟正确阅读单词的参考间隔为阅读取得足够进步的学生提供参考间隔,为那些被认为是挣扎或有阅读困难风险的读者提供参考间隔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Psicologia: Reflexão & Crítica is a journal published three times a year by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento (Psychology Graduate Program) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Its objective is to publish original works in the psychology field: articles, short reports on research and reviews as well as to present to the scientific community texts which reflect a significant contribution for the psychology field. The short title of the journal is Psicol. Refl. Crít. It must be used regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信