Are Older Adults More Optimistic? Evidence From China, Israel, and the United States.

IF 3.2
Hongmei Lin, Yuanqing Chang, Chao Chen, Yuen Wan Ho, Wanyu Xi, Xin Zhang, Helene H Fung, Liat Ayalon
{"title":"Are Older Adults More Optimistic? Evidence From China, Israel, and the United States.","authors":"Hongmei Lin,&nbsp;Yuanqing Chang,&nbsp;Chao Chen,&nbsp;Yuen Wan Ho,&nbsp;Wanyu Xi,&nbsp;Xin Zhang,&nbsp;Helene H Fung,&nbsp;Liat Ayalon","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbab046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Optimistic bias refers to the phenomenon that individuals believe bad things are less likely to happen to themselves than to others. However, whether optimistic bias could vary across age and culture is unknown. The present study aims to investigate (a) whether individuals exhibit optimistic bias in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and (b) whether age and culture would moderate such bias.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>1,051 participants recruited from China, Israel, and the United States took the online survey. Risk perceptions consist of 3 questions: estimating the infected probability of different social distance groups (i.e., self, close others, and nonclose others), the days that it would take for the number of new infections to decrease to zero and the trend of infections in regions of different geographical distances (i.e., local place, other places inside participants' country, and other countries). Participants in China and the United States also reported their personal communal values measured by Schwartz's Value Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from Hierarchical Linear Modeling generally confirmed that (a) all participants exhibited optimistic bias to some extent, and (b) with age, Chinese participants had a higher level of optimistic bias than the Israeli and U.S. participants. Compared to their younger counterparts, older Chinese are more likely to believe that local communities are at lower risk of COVID-19 than other countries.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings support the hypothesis that age differences in risk perceptions might be influenced by cultural context. Further analysis indicated that such cultural and age variations in optimistic bias were likely to be driven by age-related increase in internalized cultural values.</p>","PeriodicalId":520811,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences","volume":" ","pages":"e83-e94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/geronb/gbab046","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: Optimistic bias refers to the phenomenon that individuals believe bad things are less likely to happen to themselves than to others. However, whether optimistic bias could vary across age and culture is unknown. The present study aims to investigate (a) whether individuals exhibit optimistic bias in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and (b) whether age and culture would moderate such bias.

Method: 1,051 participants recruited from China, Israel, and the United States took the online survey. Risk perceptions consist of 3 questions: estimating the infected probability of different social distance groups (i.e., self, close others, and nonclose others), the days that it would take for the number of new infections to decrease to zero and the trend of infections in regions of different geographical distances (i.e., local place, other places inside participants' country, and other countries). Participants in China and the United States also reported their personal communal values measured by Schwartz's Value Survey.

Results: Results from Hierarchical Linear Modeling generally confirmed that (a) all participants exhibited optimistic bias to some extent, and (b) with age, Chinese participants had a higher level of optimistic bias than the Israeli and U.S. participants. Compared to their younger counterparts, older Chinese are more likely to believe that local communities are at lower risk of COVID-19 than other countries.

Discussion: These findings support the hypothesis that age differences in risk perceptions might be influenced by cultural context. Further analysis indicated that such cultural and age variations in optimistic bias were likely to be driven by age-related increase in internalized cultural values.

老年人更乐观吗?来自中国、以色列和美国的证据。
目标:乐观偏见是指个体认为坏事发生在自己身上的可能性比发生在别人身上的可能性小。然而,乐观偏见是否会因年龄和文化而异尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查(a)在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的背景下,个体是否表现出乐观偏见,以及(b)年龄和文化是否会缓和这种偏见。方法:从中国、以色列和美国招募1051名参与者进行在线调查。风险认知包括3个问题:估计不同社会距离群体(即自我、亲密他人和非亲密他人)的感染概率,新感染人数减少到零所需的天数,以及不同地理距离区域(即当地、参与者本国境内其他地方和其他国家)的感染趋势。中国和美国的参与者还报告了他们通过施瓦茨价值观调查衡量的个人共同价值观。结果:层次线性模型的结果普遍证实:(a)所有被试都表现出一定程度的乐观偏倚,(b)随着年龄的增长,中国被试的乐观偏倚水平高于以色列和美国被试。与年轻人相比,年长的中国人更有可能认为当地社区比其他国家的人感染COVID-19的风险更低。讨论:这些发现支持了风险认知的年龄差异可能受到文化背景影响的假设。进一步的分析表明,这种乐观偏见的文化和年龄差异可能是由内化文化价值观的年龄相关增长所驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信