Respiratory Candida in Patients with Bronchitis, Mucus Plugging, and Atelectasis.

Q3 Medicine
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-31 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874306402014010087
Douglas C Johnson, Suresh K Chirumamilla, Armando P Paez
{"title":"Respiratory <i>Candida</i> in Patients with Bronchitis, Mucus Plugging, and Atelectasis.","authors":"Douglas C Johnson,&nbsp;Suresh K Chirumamilla,&nbsp;Armando P Paez","doi":"10.2174/1874306402014010087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The significance of <i>Candida</i> in pulmonary secretions is unclear, and usually is regarded as colonization, not contributing to symptoms or disease. Yet, in our experience, <i>Candida</i> seemed associated with chronic sputum, mucus plugging, atelectasis, and poor outcome.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to describe the clinical findings of patients with <i>Candida</i> in pulmonary (sputum or bronchoscopy) secretions and the significance of <i>Candida</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of inpatients and outpatients referred for pulmonary consultation with <i>Candida</i> in pulmonary secretions. Clinical parameters and estimates of whether <i>Candida</i> was likely clinically significant, were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>82 inpatients and 11 outpatients were identified, of which 61 (66%) had atelectasis and 68 (73%) bronchoscopies. Of patients having bronchoscopies, 56 (82%) had mucus, and 43 (63%) mucus plugging. Of the inpatients death (or probable death) occurred in 43 (63%), 42 (98%) of which were from definite or probable respiratory failure, with 13 (31%) likely related to mucus plugging, 16 (38%) possibly from mucus plugging, 6 (14%) unknown, and 7 (17%) not due to mucus plugging. <i>Candida</i> was felt likely clinically significant in 57 patients (61%), uncertain significance in 23 (25%), and not significant in 13 (14%). All outpatients had exacerbations, including 7 (64%) within a year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients requiring pulmonary consultation with <i>Candida</i> in pulmonary secretions often have chronic sputum production, exacerbations, mucus plugging, atelectasis, and death from respiratory failure. <i>Candida</i> was likely clinically significant in most patients. Recommendations to consider <i>Candida</i> in pulmonary secretions as colonization should be reconsidered.</p>","PeriodicalId":39127,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","volume":"14 ","pages":"87-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/94/TORMJ-14-87.PMC7931156.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874306402014010087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The significance of Candida in pulmonary secretions is unclear, and usually is regarded as colonization, not contributing to symptoms or disease. Yet, in our experience, Candida seemed associated with chronic sputum, mucus plugging, atelectasis, and poor outcome.

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the clinical findings of patients with Candida in pulmonary (sputum or bronchoscopy) secretions and the significance of Candida.

Methods: Retrospective study of inpatients and outpatients referred for pulmonary consultation with Candida in pulmonary secretions. Clinical parameters and estimates of whether Candida was likely clinically significant, were determined.

Results: 82 inpatients and 11 outpatients were identified, of which 61 (66%) had atelectasis and 68 (73%) bronchoscopies. Of patients having bronchoscopies, 56 (82%) had mucus, and 43 (63%) mucus plugging. Of the inpatients death (or probable death) occurred in 43 (63%), 42 (98%) of which were from definite or probable respiratory failure, with 13 (31%) likely related to mucus plugging, 16 (38%) possibly from mucus plugging, 6 (14%) unknown, and 7 (17%) not due to mucus plugging. Candida was felt likely clinically significant in 57 patients (61%), uncertain significance in 23 (25%), and not significant in 13 (14%). All outpatients had exacerbations, including 7 (64%) within a year.

Conclusion: Patients requiring pulmonary consultation with Candida in pulmonary secretions often have chronic sputum production, exacerbations, mucus plugging, atelectasis, and death from respiratory failure. Candida was likely clinically significant in most patients. Recommendations to consider Candida in pulmonary secretions as colonization should be reconsidered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

呼吸道念珠菌在支气管炎、粘液堵塞和肺不张患者中的应用。
背景:念珠菌在肺部分泌物中的意义尚不清楚,通常被认为是定植,不会导致症状或疾病。然而,根据我们的经验,念珠菌似乎与慢性痰、粘液堵塞、肺不张和预后不良有关。目的:本研究旨在描述肺部(痰液或支气管镜)分泌物念珠菌的临床表现及其意义。方法:回顾性分析因肺部分泌物念珠菌感染而就诊的住院和门诊患者。确定了假丝酵母是否可能具有临床意义的临床参数和估计。结果:住院患者82例,门诊患者11例,其中肺不张61例(66%),支气管镜检查68例(73%)。经支气管镜检查的患者中,56例(82%)有粘液,43例(63%)有粘液堵塞。住院患者死亡(或可能死亡)43例(63%),其中42例(98%)死于明确或可能的呼吸衰竭,13例(31%)可能与粘液堵塞有关,16例(38%)可能与粘液堵塞有关,6例(14%)未知,7例(17%)非粘液堵塞所致。57例(61%)患者认为念珠菌可能具有临床意义,23例(25%)患者意义不确定,13例(14%)患者无显著性。所有门诊患者均有加重,其中7例(64%)在一年内加重。结论:需要肺部会诊的肺分泌物念珠菌患者通常有慢性产痰、加重、粘液堵塞、肺不张和呼吸衰竭死亡。念珠菌在大多数患者中可能具有临床意义。应重新考虑将肺分泌物中的念珠菌作为定植的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in respiratory medicine. Topics covered include: -COPD- Occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants- Asthma- Allergy- Non-invasive ventilation- Therapeutic intervention- Lung cancer- Lung infections respiratory diseases- Therapeutic interventions- Adult and paediatric medicine- Cell biology. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on important recent developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and making them freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信